网络技术中立行为与帮助犯研究
发布时间：2018-07-31 07:07
【摘要】：关于中立行为是否构成帮助犯的讨论,早已于多年前被德国与日本学者所关注,德国与日本学者也就这一问题展开了深入的探讨并提出了许多自己的见解。然而该问题在近年来才被我国学者所关注。遗憾的是,大部分学者都重点研究关于销售物品类型、运输服务类型等中立行为,关于网络技术中立行为的研究文献只有寥寥几篇。随着“快播”案的出现,学界开始对网络技术中立行为展开了热烈的争论。本文共分为四个部分。第一部分围绕网络技术中立行为的基本问题进行探讨,研究中立行为的概念及网络技术中立行为的概念,深入分析网络技术中立行为的特征。第二部分主要研究德国、日本以及我国学者关于网络技术中立行为与帮助犯界限的理论,并且以学者对上述理论的评析为基础,分析德国、日本以及我国的代表性学说的合理性及不足之处。第三部分通过对德国、日本关于网络技术中立行为与帮助犯的界限理论研究的基础之上,提出符合我国现实状况的网络技术中立行为构成帮助犯的要件。第四部分介绍近年来国内司法实践中对网络技术中立行为的代表性判例,主要介绍涉及侵犯知识产权犯罪、传播淫秽物品牟利犯罪、诈骗犯罪这三个方面的犯罪案例,在学者对司法机关的裁判要旨评析的基础上提出自己的见解。
[Abstract]:The discussion on whether neutral behavior constitutes an accomplice has been concerned by German and Japanese scholars many years ago. German and Japanese scholars have also deeply discussed this problem and put forward a lot of their own opinions. However, this problem has only been concerned by Chinese scholars in recent years. Unfortunately, most scholars focus on neutral behavior such as the type of goods sold and the type of transportation service, and there are only a few articles on neutral behavior of network technology. With the emergence of the Quick broadcast case, scholars began to debate the neutral behavior of network technology. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part discusses the basic problems of network technology neutral behavior, studies the concept of neutral behavior and the concept of network technology neutral behavior, and deeply analyzes the characteristics of network technology neutral behavior. The second part mainly studies the theories of German, Japanese and Chinese scholars on the boundary between net-technology neutral behavior and accomplice, and analyzes Germany based on the analysis of the above theories. The rationality and deficiency of the representative theory of Japan and our country. In the third part, on the basis of the theoretical research on the boundary between network technology neutral behavior and accomplice crime in Germany and Japan, the author puts forward that the network technology neutral act in accordance with the reality of our country constitutes the important elements of aiding crime. The fourth part introduces the representative cases of network technology neutrality in domestic judicial practice in recent years. It mainly introduces the criminal cases involving the crime of infringing intellectual property, the crime of spreading obscene articles for profit, and the crime of fraud. On the basis of the scholars' comments on the judicial organs, their own opinions are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2154818
[Abstract]:The discussion on whether neutral behavior constitutes an accomplice has been concerned by German and Japanese scholars many years ago. German and Japanese scholars have also deeply discussed this problem and put forward a lot of their own opinions. However, this problem has only been concerned by Chinese scholars in recent years. Unfortunately, most scholars focus on neutral behavior such as the type of goods sold and the type of transportation service, and there are only a few articles on neutral behavior of network technology. With the emergence of the Quick broadcast case, scholars began to debate the neutral behavior of network technology. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part discusses the basic problems of network technology neutral behavior, studies the concept of neutral behavior and the concept of network technology neutral behavior, and deeply analyzes the characteristics of network technology neutral behavior. The second part mainly studies the theories of German, Japanese and Chinese scholars on the boundary between net-technology neutral behavior and accomplice, and analyzes Germany based on the analysis of the above theories. The rationality and deficiency of the representative theory of Japan and our country. In the third part, on the basis of the theoretical research on the boundary between network technology neutral behavior and accomplice crime in Germany and Japan, the author puts forward that the network technology neutral act in accordance with the reality of our country constitutes the important elements of aiding crime. The fourth part introduces the representative cases of network technology neutrality in domestic judicial practice in recent years. It mainly introduces the criminal cases involving the crime of infringing intellectual property, the crime of spreading obscene articles for profit, and the crime of fraud. On the basis of the scholars' comments on the judicial organs, their own opinions are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨晓培;;网络技术中立行为的刑事责任范围[J];东南学术;2017年02期
2 陈洪兵;;论中立帮助行为的处罚边界[J];中国法学;2017年01期
3 曹波;;中立帮助行为刑事可罚性研究[J];国家检察官学院学报;2016年06期
4 张明楷;;论帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪[J];政治与法律;2016年02期
5 孙万怀;郑梦凌;;中立的帮助行为[J];法学;2016年01期
6 刘宪权;;论信息网络技术滥用行为的刑事责任——《刑法修正案(九)》相关条款的理解与适用[J];政法论坛;2015年06期
7 陈洪兵;;共犯的处罚边界[J];北大法律评论;2015年01期
8 刘钰;;中立帮助行为刍议[J];鄂州大学学报;2014年08期
9 黎宏;;论中立的诈骗帮助行为之定性[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2012年06期
10 陈洪兵;;质疑经济犯罪司法解释共犯之规定——以中立行为的帮助理论为视角[J];北京交通大学学报(社会科学版);2010年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 车润海;论刑法中的中立帮助行为[D];华东政法大学;2016年
2 郑梦凌;中立的帮助行为研究[D];华东政法大学;2016年
3 陆曦;中立帮助行为的入罪研究[D];河南财经政法大学;2016年
4 郝浩;中立帮助行为的刑法规制[D];山东大学;2015年
5 齐懿;中立帮助行为的可处罚性研究[D];兰州大学;2014年
，本文编号：2154818
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/2154818.html
