知乎公共说理研究
发布时间：2018-08-28 15:34
【摘要】：根植于19世纪资产阶级社会的哈贝马斯公共领域理论,为追求民主的人们规划了一幅介于国家和社会之间,公民可自由且理性的对社会公共事务发表看法、意见而不受政府干涉的公共空间蓝图。虽然公共领域依旧是理论化的存在,但它形成所需要依附的媒介,从最初的报纸到现在的互联网,为其形成提供着不同的媒介环境和条件。尤其当下移动互联网为公民参与公共表达提供并不断优化这样的条件,塑造一个又一个公民可发声的公共空间,网络被认定具有内在的民主化潜力,特别是自媒体时代下的网络公共空间有着最适合公共领域诞生的土壤,被业界给予很高的期望,放置我国,国内外的学者认为这些自媒体平台或许能够促进中国民主公共领域的出现。从而掀起对自媒体平台构建公共领域的研究热潮。然而目前研究最为争议的恰恰就是网络公共领域存在与否的问题。更多研究表明,尤其是微博代表的自媒体平台,其自身技术性、网民参与性等各方原因,构建的公共空间离理想公共领域差距巨大。原因在于这些自媒体平台所构建的公共话语空间公共理性的缺失。所以,本文避开目前公共领域有无的争议,而将本研究视角放置于关乎"网络公共领域"诞生的关键前提之一,即公共话语空间的理性问题。而理性公共话语建立在公共说理基础之上,所以试图以新生的理性自媒体平台-知乎为研究对象,立足相关理论,结合其产品机制和用户调查综合分析,验证知乎公共说理氛围的培育情况,尝试判断知乎这一自媒体公共空间理性程度。序言阐述了本次研究的背景和意义,对国内外的重要文献进行了综述和评价,并对本研究的主要内容和方法作了简要的阐述。第一章立足公共说理理论,结合公共说理构建框架,对现存自媒体空间普遍理性匮缺进行了分析;第二章总结了知乎对于培育公共说理氛围,构建理性公共话语空间所做的尝试;第三章综合知乎用户公共说理情况调查的数据分析,来验证知乎公共说理机制的效果;第四章为完善知乎公共说理氛围,构建更为理性的公共空间提出相关建议。本研究认为,在自媒体公共空间普遍缺乏理性,缺乏说理氛围的大环境下,以知识青年主体引领说理、以多样化准则规范公共说理、与用户共同把关说理对象、以多元化充实说理形式的知乎,这一理性自媒体公共空间,就其产品机制而言符合公共说理构建要素;并且通过对知乎用户公共说理情况的调查分析可得,知乎高质量的说理主体让用户理性思考能力得到显著提升、高质量的多元说理对象让用户获得理性且有价值的信息、高标准的多方说理规范对知乎用户发言起到了理性约束引导作用、多元化的说理形式使得知乎用户获得了理性说理的参与感,综合通过用户调查,证明了知乎公共说理氛围的培育有一定的成效,显现出理性的"百家争鸣"的说理氛围雏形。但与此同时还需要从几个方面去完善相关机制,从而更好的营造良好的公共说理氛围。
[Abstract]:Habermas'theory of public sphere, rooted in bourgeois society in the 19th century, provides a blueprint of public space between the state and society in which citizens can express their opinions freely and rationally on social public affairs without interference by the government. Although the public sphere is still theoretical, it does exist. From the original newspaper to the Internet, the formation of the necessary media provides different media environment and conditions. Especially at present, the mobile Internet provides and constantly optimizes the conditions for citizens to participate in public expression, creating a public space for citizens to voice, and the network is recognized as having an inherent citizen. The potential of autonomy, especially since the Internet public space in the media age has the soil most suitable for the birth of the public sphere, has been given high expectations by the industry. Scholars at home and abroad believe that these self-Media platforms may promote the emergence of China's democratic public sphere. However, the most controversial issue is whether the network public sphere exists or not. More studies show that, especially the self-Media platform represented by micro-blog, its own technical, netizen participation and other reasons, the construction of public space is far from the ideal public sphere. The reason is that these self-Media platforms are constructed. Therefore, this paper avoids the controversy in the current public sphere, and places the research perspective on one of the key premises of the birth of the "network public sphere", namely, the rationality of the public discourse space. Rational self-Media platform-knowledge as the research object, based on relevant theories, combined with its product mechanism and user survey comprehensive analysis, verify the cultivation of public reasoning atmosphere, try to judge the rational degree of self-Media public space. The preface expounds the background and significance of this study, and carries out an important literature at home and abroad. The first chapter is based on the theory of public reasoning, combined with the framework of public reasoning construction, analyzes the general lack of rationality in the existing self-Media space; the second chapter summarizes the experience of knowledge in cultivating the atmosphere of public reasoning and constructing rational public discourse space. Chapter 3 is to verify the effect of the public reasoning mechanism by analyzing the data collected from the survey on the public reasoning of users. Chapter 4 is to put forward some suggestions for improving the public reasoning atmosphere and building a more rational public space. Under the guidance of young intellectuals, standardizing public reasoning with diversified criteria, and jointly checking the reasoning objects with users, and enriching the reasoning form with diversification, this rationality from the media public space, in terms of its product mechanism, conforms to the elements of public reasoning construction; and through the investigation and analysis of the public reasoning situation of users It can be concluded that high-quality reasoning subjects can significantly improve the rational thinking ability of users, high-quality multi-reasoning objects enable users to obtain rational and valuable information, high-standard multi-reasoning norms play a rational role in restricting and guiding users to speak, and diversified reasoning forms enable users to acquire rational thinking. The sense of participation in reasoning has proved that the cultivation of public reasoning atmosphere is effective and shows the rudiment of rational reasoning atmosphere.
【学位授予单位】：中央民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G206
本文编号：2209840
[Abstract]:Habermas'theory of public sphere, rooted in bourgeois society in the 19th century, provides a blueprint of public space between the state and society in which citizens can express their opinions freely and rationally on social public affairs without interference by the government. Although the public sphere is still theoretical, it does exist. From the original newspaper to the Internet, the formation of the necessary media provides different media environment and conditions. Especially at present, the mobile Internet provides and constantly optimizes the conditions for citizens to participate in public expression, creating a public space for citizens to voice, and the network is recognized as having an inherent citizen. The potential of autonomy, especially since the Internet public space in the media age has the soil most suitable for the birth of the public sphere, has been given high expectations by the industry. Scholars at home and abroad believe that these self-Media platforms may promote the emergence of China's democratic public sphere. However, the most controversial issue is whether the network public sphere exists or not. More studies show that, especially the self-Media platform represented by micro-blog, its own technical, netizen participation and other reasons, the construction of public space is far from the ideal public sphere. The reason is that these self-Media platforms are constructed. Therefore, this paper avoids the controversy in the current public sphere, and places the research perspective on one of the key premises of the birth of the "network public sphere", namely, the rationality of the public discourse space. Rational self-Media platform-knowledge as the research object, based on relevant theories, combined with its product mechanism and user survey comprehensive analysis, verify the cultivation of public reasoning atmosphere, try to judge the rational degree of self-Media public space. The preface expounds the background and significance of this study, and carries out an important literature at home and abroad. The first chapter is based on the theory of public reasoning, combined with the framework of public reasoning construction, analyzes the general lack of rationality in the existing self-Media space; the second chapter summarizes the experience of knowledge in cultivating the atmosphere of public reasoning and constructing rational public discourse space. Chapter 3 is to verify the effect of the public reasoning mechanism by analyzing the data collected from the survey on the public reasoning of users. Chapter 4 is to put forward some suggestions for improving the public reasoning atmosphere and building a more rational public space. Under the guidance of young intellectuals, standardizing public reasoning with diversified criteria, and jointly checking the reasoning objects with users, and enriching the reasoning form with diversification, this rationality from the media public space, in terms of its product mechanism, conforms to the elements of public reasoning construction; and through the investigation and analysis of the public reasoning situation of users It can be concluded that high-quality reasoning subjects can significantly improve the rational thinking ability of users, high-quality multi-reasoning objects enable users to obtain rational and valuable information, high-standard multi-reasoning norms play a rational role in restricting and guiding users to speak, and diversified reasoning forms enable users to acquire rational thinking. The sense of participation in reasoning has proved that the cultivation of public reasoning atmosphere is effective and shows the rudiment of rational reasoning atmosphere.
【学位授予单位】：中央民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G206
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 韩志严;;社会化媒体中知识传播的自组织研究——以“知乎”为例[J];新闻研究导刊;2016年03期
2 李文倩;;公共说理为什么重要?[J];政治思想史;2015年04期
3 刘佩;林如鹏;;网络问答社区“知乎”的知识分享与传播行为研究[J];图书情报知识;2015年06期
4 杨笑雨;范继忠;;知乎网用户贡献影响因素实证分析[J];北京印刷学院学报;2015年05期
5 邓寻丹;;知乎日报的传播特点及未来发展——基于知乎日报和网易新闻客户端的对比研究[J];新闻世界;2015年10期
6 刘婉婷;章杨;;“知乎”的传播模式和未来发展[J];新闻世界;2015年08期
7 张紫璇;;从知乎网看UGC平台自组织运行机制的弊端[J];视听;2015年06期
8 张蕊;;“异军”知乎的突起——浅析知乎的发展现状[J];视听;2015年06期
9 鄢烈山;余党绪;;批判性思维是指向公正的思维方式——“关于公共说理与批判性思维”的对话[J];语文学习;2015年05期
10 刘擎;唐小兵;;“好斗性”话语仍制约着我们——关于公共说理文化的对谈[J];同舟共进;2015年04期
，本文编号：2209840
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/xixikjs/2209840.html
