道义救助危机的过程叙事、实践反思及制度重构——基于延伸个案的分析进路

发布时间：2018-03-12 19:51

本文选题：道义救助　切入点：道德危机　出处：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2016年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：当下的道义救助危机,不仅是中国日益弥散的整体性道德危机的一个重要组成部分,而且是其宏大背景的一个微观影射。"彭宇案"及"小悦悦事件"充分表明,道义救助危机的酿就绝非偶然,而是有着复杂的社会背景和深刻的行动逻辑:正是由于长期以来人们习惯了漠视乃至无视道德成本的客观存在,才促使人们在道德实践中不自觉地遵循了一种悖反的行动逻辑,即过多地将精力倾注于道德话语的传播,而无暇甚至无心眷顾那些在实质上支撑道德践行的外部条件,以致在道义救助的场合,道德规范的一次不经意的隐退,引发了一场旷日持久的危机。因此,必须正视道德成本的基本原理,加快制度化的公共道德治理机制建设,即建构一套以道德行为的成本原理为基础,以道德行为的供需平衡为目标,以公共政策的有效供给为手段,集道义救助的风险干预、成本补偿、行为回馈、需求筛滤以及需求分担机制为一体的制度化的公共道德治理机制。
[Abstract]:The current crisis of moral salvation is not only an important part of China's increasingly diffuse overall moral crisis, but also a microcosmic implication of its grand background. The "Peng Yu case" and the "Xiao Yue Yue incident" fully demonstrate that. The brewing of moral salvation crisis is not accidental, but has a complex social background and profound logic of action: it is precisely because people have long been used to ignoring and even ignoring the objective existence of moral costs. It is only in the practice of morality that people unconsciously follow a contrary logic of action, that is, they devote too much energy to the spread of moral discourse, and have no time or even no intention to care for the external conditions that actually support moral practice. As a result, on the occasion of moral aid, a inadvertent retreat of moral norms has caused a protracted crisis. Therefore, we must face the basic principles of moral costs and speed up the construction of institutionalized public moral governance mechanisms. That is, to construct a set of moral behavior based on the principle of cost, taking the balance of supply and demand of moral behavior as the goal, taking the effective supply of public policy as the means, collecting moral rescue risk intervention, cost compensation, behavior feedback. Demand sieve filter and demand sharing mechanism as one of the institutionalized public moral governance mechanism.
【作者单位】：浙江警察学院侦查系;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(15YJS820085)
【分类号】：D648

【相似文献】