罗尔斯公共理性及其对道德教育的启示
[Abstract]:Political democratization, economic marketization and value diversification are the indelible features of this era. Such characteristics of the times involve conflicts of interests and values, involving the handling of various public relations, such as citizens and citizens, citizens and society. Value pluralism challenges the traditional value system and moral education. Modern society urgently needs to regulate and guide all kinds of views and interests, and urgently need the support of public spirit. All these depend on moral education in modern society. The importance of moral education is becoming more and more important. Rawls' public rationality responds to the characteristics of the present era, and the response to this problem includes the affirmation of the existence of various rational doctrines, the respect for individual contemplation, the exploration of coexistence methods of pluralistic ideas, and so on. These are also questions that moral education needs to consider and respond to. This paper analyzes and interprets moral education from the perspective of the current era background, and discusses moral education from Rawls' theoretical achievements of public rationality in response to the problems of the times. By combing the basic concepts, the thesis makes the concepts of morality, moral education and Rawls public rationality more clearly expressed and displayed. Through the analysis of the social environment and the realistic challenge of moral education, the realistic situation of moral education is clarified. On this basis, compared with the actual state of moral education to explore the problems of moral education. This paper focuses on analyzing the enlightenment of Rawls public reason to moral education, exploring the methods of coordinating moral education with the development of the times, so as to strengthen the guiding role of moral education in the personal and public spheres. Realizing the "way of adults" and regulating the essential requirements of civil relations will help to build a harmonious and orderly society. The characteristics of modern society are becoming more and more obvious. People enjoy the achievements brought about by the development of the times, and at the same time, they can not avoid to solve the problems arising from them. The morality with cultural sensitivity needs to be unified in the cultural background of socialism with Chinese characteristics. Socialist core values are the inexhaustible source of morality and moral education, which is the basis for moral education to respond to the problems of the times. The existence and development of human society need rationality and pluralism, and rational pluralism coexist in society. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to study how Rawls' public rationality responds to the demands of the times.
【学位授予单位】:安徽工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D091;D648
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 董礼;王成兵;;在道德与政治之间:罗尔斯公共理性概念辨析[J];社会科学战线;2014年11期
2 寇东亮;;公共理性及其道德意义:康德与罗尔斯的诠释[J];伦理学研究;2012年05期
3 丛占修;;罗尔斯正当性与稳定性论证辨析——兼论重叠共识与公共理性[J];烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年04期
4 张玉欣;;论全球化语境下和谐共存的道德教育[J];大家;2011年15期
5 刘向宇;邢赞赞;;老子德育思想与卢梭德育思想刍议[J];学周刊;2011年09期
6 王西华;;正义原则的优先性何以实现?——评罗尔斯正义原则优先性的实现理论[J];实事求是;2010年04期
7 鲁洁;;道德教育的根本作为:引导生活的建构[J];教育研究;2010年06期
8 夏庆波;;正义概念的政治哲学阐释[J];四川行政学院学报;2009年06期
9 夏庆波;;论公共性视域中的思想政治教育[J];思想教育研究;2009年06期
10 奥诺拉·奥尼尔;秦兴;;政治自由主义与公共理性——对罗尔斯《政治自由主义》的一个批判性评论[J];马克思主义与现实;2009年03期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 吕晓明;;罗尔斯正义论与公平正义价值观的确立[A];价值哲学发展论[C];2008年
2 包利民;;《罗尔斯篇》——试论斯特劳斯派对现代性学问的挑战[A];全国“当代西方哲学的新进展”学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2008年
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 钟英法;罗尔斯公共理性思想研究[D];复旦大学;2007年
2 张会永;康德的道德信仰研究[D];复旦大学;2007年
3 邓毅;宪政民主的道德基础[D];中国政法大学;2007年
4 辛治洋;道德判断与道德教育[D];南京师范大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 安蕾;罗尔斯正义理论中的教育思想研究[D];东北师范大学;2010年
2 朱敏;公共理性与当代学校道德教育[D];山东师范大学;2008年
3 何维;论道德社会化[D];中南大学;2007年
,本文编号:2238208
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/sizhenglunwen/2238208.html