当社会信任遇见政府信任——西方实证研究成果跟踪
发布时间：2018-10-17 08:20
【摘要】：西方学术界对社会信任与政府信任关系的研究以实证为主导,因量化设计不同、样本数量有别等因素,两种信任间的相关性多有变化,实证研究解释差异显著。最初政府信任与社会信任被认为是人格特质的一体两面,混淆了策略性信任与普遍性信任,这一预设在个体层面的实证结果亦相互矛盾。部分实证研究调整方向,从国别比较层面见证了社会信任与政府信任的显著正相关,公正健全的制度被认为是两者并生的刚性保障。此后调研设计更新,因11点量表固有的中心化趋势误差,社会信任与政府信任的强正相关在个体层面被证实,跟进的"胜者假设"解释也存在以偏概全的层次谬误问题。
[Abstract]:The research on the relationship between social trust and government trust in western academic circles is dominated by positivism. Because of different quantitative design and different sample size, the correlation between the two kinds of trust varies, and the explanation of empirical research is significant. Initially, government trust and social trust were regarded as two sides of personality traits, which confused strategic trust with universal trust, and the empirical results of this presupposition were contradictory at individual level. Part of the empirical research on the adjustment direction, from the country comparison level witnessed the significant positive correlation between social trust and government trust, fair and sound system is considered to be the rigid guarantee of the two. Since then, the survey design is updated, due to the inherent centralization trend error of 11:00 scale, the strong positive correlation between social trust and government trust is confirmed at the individual level.
【作者单位】： 中国石油大学(华东)马克思主义学院;
【基金】：北京市教育委员会资助项目“当代西方政治文化理论代表人物研究”(20131005301) 中国石油大学自主创新科研计划项目(27R1509021B)
【分类号】：D64
，
本文编号：2276069
[Abstract]:The research on the relationship between social trust and government trust in western academic circles is dominated by positivism. Because of different quantitative design and different sample size, the correlation between the two kinds of trust varies, and the explanation of empirical research is significant. Initially, government trust and social trust were regarded as two sides of personality traits, which confused strategic trust with universal trust, and the empirical results of this presupposition were contradictory at individual level. Part of the empirical research on the adjustment direction, from the country comparison level witnessed the significant positive correlation between social trust and government trust, fair and sound system is considered to be the rigid guarantee of the two. Since then, the survey design is updated, due to the inherent centralization trend error of 11:00 scale, the strong positive correlation between social trust and government trust is confirmed at the individual level.
【作者单位】： 中国石油大学(华东)马克思主义学院;
【基金】：北京市教育委员会资助项目“当代西方政治文化理论代表人物研究”(20131005301) 中国石油大学自主创新科研计划项目(27R1509021B)
【分类号】：D64
，
本文编号：2276069
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/sizhenglunwen/2276069.html
