基于Mendeley阅读数据的论文使用分析

发布时间：2018-06-06 22:07

本文选题：替代计量 + 使用分析　；参考：《图书情报工作》2017年14期

【摘要】：[目的/意义]通过对Mendeley阅读数据的分析,探讨引用行为之外更广范围的论文使用行为,以进一步完善学术论文的影响力评价体系。[方法/过程]选择社会学、历史学、生态学和应用物理学四个学科领域,从Scopus、Altmetric.com采集被引数据和阅读数据,并进行相关性分析。从身份、国别以及学科三个角度对Mendeley阅读数据Top100的文献用户身份和行为特征进行深入的探究。[结果/结论]在四个学科文献集合中,Mendeley阅读数据均比被引频次的覆盖率高,说明引用行为只是论文使用的冰山一角。对于不同使用动机的用户,其使用行为都存在学科差异;不同国家使用者对论文的使用习惯有地域差异;学术论文的跨学科使用情况与自身学科特性密切相关。
[Abstract]:[objective / significance] through the analysis of Mendeley's reading data, the paper's use behavior beyond citation behavior is discussed in order to further improve the influence evaluation system of academic papers. [method / process] selecting four fields of sociology, history, ecology and applied physics, collecting cited data and reading data from Scopus-Altmetric.com, and analyzing the correlation between them. This paper probes into the identity and behavioral characteristics of Mendeley reading data Top100 from the perspectives of identity, country and discipline. [results / conclusion] the data coverage of Mendeley reading is higher than that of citation frequency in the four subject literature collections, indicating that the citation behavior is only the tip of the iceberg used in this paper. For the users with different use motivation, there are disciplinary differences in their use behavior; there are regional differences in the usage habits of the users in different countries; the interdisciplinary use of academic papers is closely related to their own disciplinary characteristics.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学政府管理学院;
【基金】：ISTIC-EBSCO文献大数据发现服务联合实验室基金项目研究成果之一
【分类号】：G353.1

【相似文献】