PubMed数据库中我国论文撤销原因及学术影响力分析

发布时间：2018-07-11 21:31

本文选题：PubMed数据库 + 撤销论文　；参考：《中国科技期刊研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：【目的】分析PubMed数据库中因不同原因撤销的我国论文的文献计量学特征以及净化效果。【方法】收集2005—2014年PubMed因不同原因而撤销的我国学术论文的地区、期刊分布情况;分析撤销论文数量随时间的变化趋势以及撤销论文的撤销时滞和净化效果。【结果】共检索到撤销的中国论文370篇,撤销原因中,剽窃类型最多,错误次之,其次为重复发表、学术道德问题。因错误和学术不端撤销的论文数量逐年增长。湖北、上海、北京、山东、江苏、浙江、广东、台湾、黑龙江、陕西、重庆显示度比较高。期刊的分布比较分散,表现规律不明显。各种类型净化时间成本均衡。除其他类型外,各种类型论文撤销后学术净化效果显著。【结论】揭示了我国生物医学类论文撤销的主要原因及不同原因撤销论文的净化效果。建议编辑、期刊、数据库出版商应当规范和完善撤销声明和撤销原因的标注,避免引用撤销后的论文,共同净化学术环境。
[Abstract]:[objective] to analyze the bibliometrics characteristics and purifying effect of Chinese papers withdrawn for different reasons in PubMed database. [methods] to collect the distribution of journals in PubMed from 2005 to 2014. This paper analyzes the trend of the number of revocation papers over time, and the time lag and purification effect of revocation papers. [results] 370 Chinese papers were retrieved. Among the reasons for revocation, plagiarism is the most, error is the second, and repeat publication is the second. The question of academic morality The number of papers cancelled due to errors and academic misconduct has increased year by year. Hubei, Shanghai, Beijing, Shandong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Guangdong, Taiwan, Heilongjiang, Shaanxi, Chongqing show a high degree. The distribution of periodicals is scattered, and the law of expression is not obvious. All types of purification time cost equilibrium. Among other types, the academic purification effect of various kinds of papers is remarkable. [conclusion] the main reasons of revocation of biomedical papers in China and the purifying effect of different reasons are revealed. It is suggested that editors, journal publishers and database publishers should standardize and improve the labeling of revocation statements and reasons for revocation, avoid quoting papers after revocation, and jointly purify the academic environment.
【作者单位】：新乡医学院期刊社《眼科新进展》编辑部;河南省科技期刊研究中心;
【基金】：新乡医学院科技期刊与科研绩效评价研究培育基地项目
【分类号】：G353.1

【相似文献】