《编珠》残卷研究

发布时间：2019-02-16 19:12

【摘要】：在中国古代类书发展史中,隋代类书占据了承上启下的关键位置。而《编珠》作为现存隋代类书,虽然有所残缺,却具有独特的历史作用。然而自清代高士奇发现《编珠》残卷之后,以四库馆臣为首的学界人士多认为此书为伪作。因此,清代辑佚家并未对之加以充分利用,以致使其文献价值不仅没有得到充分挖掘与合理定位,甚至有学者对之避之唯恐不及。本文以辨别是书的真伪为基点,从而对其编纂体例、所引诗赋类作品以及地记作品进行考证,在考证中又以其独有的文献价值来证明该书的真实性。本文分绪论和正文两部分,绪论介绍了《编珠》残卷概况,包括学界对于《编珠》的评价认识和研究成果,以及《编珠》所具有的校勘与辑佚价值,即本文选题意义与可行性。正文是本文的主体部分,首先对以四库馆臣为代表的质疑《编珠》作伪说进行了反驳。从理论方面看,由于“古书近出”现象以及避讳问题的人为因素存在,使得《编珠》这样一部古书具有存在的可能性,而且其中涉及到的不讳“广”字问题有可能是避讳未尽或者后人回改所致。从书目著录方面看,四库馆臣认为《宋志》最先著录《编珠》,这个说法是有问题的。因为经查证,其前已有书目对其进行著录,而且卷数问题存异。从《编珠》内容看,其中有可辑佚的文字条目,且出处为异书。并且,《编珠》所涉及的《乐府解题》一书理应先于唐吴兢《乐府解题》。所以,从内容价值上可以肯定《编珠》在当时是存在的。从流传与版本看,《编珠》重见于世之时,发现者并非高士奇一人,传抄者亦非一家。然今可见者,乃为高氏刊本。从作者来看,杜公瞻曾仕隋著作郎,亦具备编书条件。因此,四库馆臣称《编珠》一书作伪未免有所疏失。其次,对该书的编纂体例进行了分析。从门类划分看,《编珠》体现了“天、地、人”三位合一的思想观念,而这种排列顺序是和中国古代社会意识形态及其系统化的思维方式相关的。从编纂体例看,因其前类书残缺不全,未见全貌,故而难以比较。而其后的类书,如《北堂书钞》、《初学记》等对其“互见”、“事对”等引文之法皆有参考,这更加证明了它在类书史上的作用不可替代。最后,对《编珠》所引的诗赋类作品和地记作品分别进行了考证,从中梳理出了《编珠》独有的引文条目:诗类计1条,赋类计15条,地记佚文30种,以及前人失辑的文字若干。通过这样的梳理,不仅对《编珠》的引文方式有所认识,而且进一步从内容方面的文献价值肯定了该书的真实性。
[Abstract]:In the history of ancient Chinese books, Sui Dynasty books occupied the key position. As an extant Sui Dynasty book, Zanzhu has a unique historical function, although it is incomplete. However, since Gao Shiqi discovered the remnant volume of the Book of Pearl in Qing Dynasty, scholars headed by Siku Guanchen considered it a pseudo. Therefore, the authors of the Qing Dynasty did not make full use of it, so that the value of its literature was not fully excavated and rationally located, and some scholars even avoided it. Based on the identification of the authenticity of the book, this paper makes textual research on its compilation style, the cited works of poetry and Fu and the works of the earth record, and proves the authenticity of the book with its unique literature value in the textual research. This paper is divided into two parts: introduction and main text. The introduction introduces the general situation of "compiling beads", including the academic circles' evaluation and research results, as well as the value of collation and collection, that is, the significance and feasibility of selecting the topic of this paper. The text is the main part of this paper. Theoretically, due to the phenomenon of "ancient books coming out" and the existence of human factors to avoid the problem, it is possible for such an ancient book, such as "compiling Pearl", to exist. And involved in the word "wide" question is likely to be taboo or later reform. As far as bibliographic description is concerned, Siku officials think that Song Zhi was the first cataloguing, which is questionable. Because it has been verified, it has been catalogued before, and the volume of the problem is different. From the content of the Pearl, there are some text items which can be collected, and the source is a different book. Besides, Yuefu's problem solving is supposed to precede Tang Wu's. Therefore, from the value of the content can be sure that the "Zanzhu" was there at that time. From the point of view of the spread and the edition, the discoverer is not a gauskey, nor is it a family. However, the present can be seen, is for the publication of the Gao. From the author's point of view, du Gongzhan had Sui works Lang, also has the compilation conditions. As a result, Siku officials said that the book was false. Secondly, the compilation style of the book is analyzed. According to the classification of categories, "compiling beads" embodies the idea of "heaven, earth and man", which is related to the ideology of ancient Chinese society and its systematic mode of thinking. From the compilation style, it is difficult to compare because its former books are incomplete and incomplete. However, the later class books, such as Beitang Book Notes, beginners' Notes, and so on, have references to the citations such as "seeing each other" and "matter to right", which proves that their role in the history of the class books cannot be replaced. Finally, the author makes a textual research on the poems and poems cited in the Book of Pearl, and finds out the unique citation entries of the Book of Pearl: 1 poem, 15 Fu, 30 lost works. As well as the predecessors lost the text of a number of. Through this sort of combing, not only the citation mode of "compiling Pearl" is recognized, but also the authenticity of the book is confirmed by the literature value of the content.
【学位授予单位】：河北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G256

【参考文献】