英国硕士酒店管理学thesis开题
论文题目:The research of employee engagement and job satisfaction in Chinese service industry
论文语言:英语论文 English
论文专业:Human Resource Management
字数:毕业论文开题报告2000
学校国家:英国
是否有数据处理要求:否
您的学校:
论文用于:Master Dissertation 硕士毕业论文
补充要求和说明:经过协商客户要求写关于酒店方向的
1.开题报告2000字
1.0 Introduction介绍
当今世界,人力资源已成为企业竞争的核心资源,敬业的员工有着非常重要的积极作用,,为企业的生产力、客户忠诚度、员工保留率、安全和生产价值(belias,koustelios,sdrolias和aspridis,2015)。员工以高度的奉献精神为企业带来丰厚的利润,提高客户忠诚度,是推动企业利润增长的积极力量。中国是世界第二大经济体,与过去相比,企业的竞争力得到很大程度的改善,数据显示,中国员工敬业度仅为6%,远低于世界13%的水平(Farooqui和Nagendra,2014)。中国员工敬业度低,这是中国企业进一步提高自身竞争力的一个非常大的障碍(该,机理和巴宾,2014)。许多中国企业管理者都意识到问题的严重性,他们努力改进内部管理,提高工作满意度,从而提高员工敬业度,但实际效果不好。笔者认为,中国有着独特的文化传统、政治体制和市场环境,中国工人在价值观、态度、工作伦理等诸多方面都有所不同,因此,可以提高中国员工满意度的措施,符合中国职工提高员工敬业度的特点,才能真正提高中国员工的参与度。这项研究是基于这样的研究和分析。In today's world, human resources has become the core resources of enterprises in competition, dedicated staff has a very important and positive role for business productivity, customer loyalty, employee retention, safety and production value (Belias, Koustelios, Sdrolias and Aspridis, 2015). Employees with a high degree of dedication bring enterprises huge profits and improve customer loyalty, they are the active force to promote the growth of profit of an organization. China is the world's second largest economy, compared with the past, the competitiveness of companies has been improved to a large extent, data has showed that China's employee engagement is only 6%, which is far below the world level of 13% (Farooqui and Nagendra, 2014). Chinese employee engagement is low, which is a very big impediment for Chinese enterprises to further improve their competitiveness (Limbu, Jayachandran and Babin, 2014). Many Chinese business managers are aware of the seriousness of the problem, they try to improve internal management to improve job satisfaction, so as to improve employee engagement, but the actual effect is not good. The author believes that China has unique cultural traditions, political system and market environment, Chinese workers are different from European and American workers in terms of values, attitudes, work ethic, and many other aspects, therefore the development of the measures which can improve Chinese employee satisfaction and are in line with the characteristics of Chinese workers to improve employee engagement will truly improve employee engagement in China. This study is based on this to carry out research and analysis.
2.1 Employee engagement
2.2 Job satisfaction
2.3 Relationship between employee engagement and job satisfaction
2.4 Gap
3.0 Research aims and objectives
4.0 Methodology
5.0 Sampling selection
6.0 Data selection
7.0 Data analysis
8.0 Limitation
Appendix 1 Questionnaire
Appendix 2 Interview outline
9.0 Conclusion总结
References
Andrew, O. C. and Sofian, S. (2012). Individual factors and work outcomes of employee engagement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 498-508.
Avery, R. E., Smillie, L. D. and Fife-Schaw, C. R. (2015). Employee achievement orientations and personality as predictors of job satisfaction facets. Personality and Individual Differences, 7(4), 56-61.
Azoury, A., Daou, L. and Sleiaty, F. (2013). Employee engagement in family and non-family firms. International Strategic Management Review, 1(1), 11-29.
Bedarkar, M. and Pandita, D. (2014). A study on the drivers of employee engagement impacting employee performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133(15), 106-115.
Belias, D., Koustelios, A., Sdrolias, L. and Aspridis, G. (2015). Job satisfaction, role conflict and autonomy of employees in the Greek banking organization. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 175(12), 324-333.
Belias, D., Koustelios, A., Vairaktarakis, G. and Sdrolias, L. (2015). Organizational culture and job satisfaction of Greek banking institutions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 175(12), 314-323.
Best, J.W. (1997). Research in education. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Cahill, K. E., McNamara, T. K., Catsouphes, M. P. and Valcour, M. (2015). Linking shifts in the national economy with changes in job satisfaction, employee engagement and work–life balance. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 56(6), 40-54.
Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: International Educational and Professional Publisher.
Farooqui,S. and Nagendra, A. (2014). The impact of person organization fit on job satisfaction and performance of the employee. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 122-129.
Kaliannan, M. and Adjovu, S. N. (2015). Effective Employee Engagement and Organizational Success: a case study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172(27), 161-168.
Karanges, E., Johnston, K., Beatson, A. and Lings, I. (2015). The influence of internal communication on employee engagement: a pilot study. Public Relations Review, 41(1), 129-131.
Kurland, H., Hasson-Gilad, D. R. (2015). Organizational learning and extra effort: The mediating effect of job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49(7), 56-67.
Limbu, Y. B., Jayachandran, C. and Babin, B. J. (2014). Does information and communication technology improve job satisfaction? The moderating role of sales technology orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(7),1236-1245.
Platis, C., Reklitis, P. and Zimeras, S. (2015). Relation between job satisfaction and job performance in healthcare services. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 175(12),480-487.
Song, Z., Chon, K., Ding, G. and Gu, C. (2015). Impact of organizational socialization tactics on newcomer job satisfaction and engagement: Core self-evaluations as moderators. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 46(4), 180-189.
Wulandari, P., Mangundjaya, W. and Utoyo, D. B. (2015). Is Job Satisfaction a Moderator or Mediator on the Relationship between Change Leadership and Commitment to Change? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172(27),104-111.
本文编号:36929
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenshubaike/lwfw/36929.html