英语科技论文摘要中介入资源的分析

发布时间：2018-02-22 16:39

本文关键词： 评价理论介入系统科技语篇科研论文摘要　出处：《苏州大学》2008年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 近年来,学术摘要受到了研究者的关注,大量有价值的研究广泛涉及了对其语言特征、体裁结构和人际意义等方面的探讨。但是以往对气人际意义的研究忽略了对态度以及作者与读者之间的学术互动的研究。本论文将以系统功能语言学中的评价理论为理论框架,来探讨学术摘要语篇中的介入资源及其反应出的作者的主观性。评价理论研究的是一整套运用语言表达态度的资源系统,用以研究、描述、解释语篇中的作者如何使用语言开展评价、定立态度、建构语篇角色和协调人家关系,它补充了韩礼德语法中的人际意义模型,关注对于赋值语义的研究,将更多的词汇资源纳入到分析框架中来。该系统包括三大主系统:态度,级差和介入。本文所做研究的理论框架为三大主系统中的介入子系统。介入子系统从对话和多声的角度来探讨态度的来源,又可以细分为对话性压缩和对话性扩展两个范畴。对话性压缩关闭或限制了与其他态度的对话空间,对话性扩展则是开启与其他态度的对话空间。本文中选的20篇摘要均来自美国的《科学》期刊。在评价理论框架下本文对所选择的摘要进行了数据分析,定量分析和定性分析互为补充,得出以下结论:1.介入资源广泛存在于科技论文摘要中;2.论文作者使用引发资源将对研究结果的解释或研究的应用表现为一系列可能中的一种,以此打开对话空间,以联盟更多读者加入到对话中来;3.作者使用承认和疏远资源的主要作用是在对话引入其他声音,并承认或否认该声音的正确性,以获得潜在读者的认同;4.即使是在介入资源这个子系统中,摘要作者更倾向于使用对话的压缩,这反应了在科技论文的客观性的表象下隐藏着作者的主观性。
[Abstract]:In recent years, academic abstracts have attracted the attention of researchers, and a large number of valuable studies have been extensively concerned with their linguistic characteristics. Genre structure and interpersonal meaning are discussed. However, previous researches on interpersonal meaning have neglected the study of attitudes and the academic interaction between the author and the reader. This thesis will take the evaluation theory in systemic functional linguistics as the theoretical framework. To explore the intervention resources in academic abstract discourse and the subjectivity of the author. Evaluation theory studies a set of resource systems using language to express attitudes, which are used to study, describe and explain how the authors use language to carry out evaluation, to establish attitudes, to construct discourse roles and to coordinate family relations. It complements the interpersonal meaning model in Halliday grammar, focuses on the study of assignment semantics, and brings more lexical resources into the analytical framework. The theoretical framework of this paper is the intervention subsystem of the three main systems. The intervention subsystem discusses the origin of attitude from the angle of dialogue and multi-sound. It can also be subdivided into two categories: conversational compression and dialogical expansion, which close or limit the dialogue space with other attitudes, while conversational expansion opens the dialogue space with other attitudes. The 20 abstracts selected in this paper are all from the American Journal of Science. In the framework of evaluation theory, the selected abstracts are analyzed by data, and the quantitative and qualitative analysis are complementary. The following conclusion is drawn: 1.Interventional resources widely exist in abstracts of scientific and technological papers. The author of the paper uses trigger resources to explain the results of the research or to apply the research as one of a series of possible ways to open up the space for dialogue. The main role of the author in using recognition and alienating resources is to introduce other voices into the dialogue and to acknowledge or deny the validity of that voice. Even in the subsystem of intervening resources, the authors tend to use the compression of dialogue, which reflects that the subjectivity of the authors is hidden under the representation of objectivity of scientific and technological papers.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：H315

【相似文献】