新制度经济学视角下人文社会科学期刊论文评审研究

发布时间：2018-02-26 02:32

本文关键词： 人文社会科学期刊新制度经济学论文评审同行专家　出处：《大连理工大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：人文社会科学期刊与科技期刊的论文评审相比,受人的主观因素影响较大,同行评议显得尤为重要。人文社会科学论文能否发表,涉及的不仅仅是论文本身的学术问题,更受到评审主体、评审制度等更深层次因素的影响。在以经济建设为中心的当今社会,对人文社会科学期刊论文评审的研究不仅需要管理学、科学学等“近亲”学科为其提供智力支持,而且需要经济学的研究视角。为了深入分析这些影响因素产生的原因,从新制度经济学的角度,挖掘评审程序各个环节的经济学机制,采用新制度经济学分析方法,从人的有限理性和机会主义倾向、委托代理关系和交易成本三个方面展开研究。指出入作为经济社会主体,都具有谋求自身利益最大化的倾向；投稿作者、期刊编辑与同行专家之间存在着委托代理关系,三者之间的信息不对称,导致了逆向选择和道德风险的产生；在论文的评审过程中,由于对专家的搜寻、维护存在交易成本,评审周期的长短也给作者带来了时间成本,这些都影响了论文的最优选择和学术资源的最优配置。为了科学、客观、公正地评审人文社会科学论文,采用新制度经济学、引文分析和信息可视化方法对构建同行专家的选择与监督、信息沟通与反馈等机制进行了探讨。在同行专家遴选问题上,引入科学计量学方法可以降低人为因素干扰,减少逆向选择的产生；加强委托代理双方的沟通可以降低同行专家的道德风险,专家库的建立还可以增加交易频率、减少交易成本；主编的职责归位和开放同行评审可以对同行专家进行有效的监督。人文社会科学期刊需要通过制度建设来最大限度地屏蔽人情关系,从机制上解决问题。
[Abstract]:Compared with the review of papers in the journals of humanities and social sciences, it is more influenced by subjective factors, so peer review is particularly important. Whether or not the papers of humanities and social sciences can be published involves not only the academic problems of the papers themselves. In today's society with economic construction as the center, the research on the review of humanities and social sciences journals need not only management science, but also the evaluation system. Science and other related disciplines provide intellectual support, and need the perspective of economics. In order to deeply analyze the causes of these influencing factors, from the angle of new institutional economics, this paper excavates the economic mechanism of each link of the evaluation procedure, adopts the new institutional economics analysis method, from the human limited rationality and opportunism tendency, Three aspects of principal-agent relationship and transaction cost are studied. It is pointed out that as economic and social subjects, they all tend to maximize their own interests, and there is a principal-agent relationship between contributors, journal editors and peer experts. The asymmetric information between the three leads to adverse selection and moral hazard. In the review process of the paper, due to the search for experts, the maintenance of transaction costs, the length of the review cycle also brings the time cost to the author. All of these affect the optimal choice of papers and the optimal allocation of academic resources. In order to evaluate the humanities and social science papers scientifically, objectively and impartially, and adopt the new institutional economics, citation analysis and information visualization methods to select and supervise the experts, The mechanism of information communication and feedback is discussed. In the problem of peer expert selection, the introduction of scientific metrology method can reduce the interference of human factors and the production of adverse selection. Strengthening the communication between principal and agent can reduce the moral hazard of peer experts, and the establishment of expert bank can increase the transaction frequency and reduce the transaction cost. The chief editor's responsibility and the opening of peer review can effectively supervise the peer experts, and the humanities and social science periodicals need to shield the human relationship to the maximum extent through the institution construction, and solve the problems from the mechanism.
【学位授予单位】：大连理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：G353.1;G255.2

【参考文献】