论文化创意产业的刑法保护

发布时间：2018-05-02 13:05

本文选题：文化创意产业 + 知识产权　；参考：《复旦大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：文化是一种力量,文化竞争力是国家的核心竞争力。文化创意产业是文化与经济日益相互交融的产物,是文化、科技、创意相结合的产业形式,它是以创新、创造、创作为根本手段,以文化和创意成果为核心内容,以知识产权为交易特征的新兴产业。文化创意产业不是先天就具有的,是经济发展到一定程度、国家发展到一定时期、社会进步到一定阶段后才形成的新兴经济模式。在目前,文化创意产业已经成为世界经济增长的新模式。早在1926年,德国法兰克福学派重要代表人物之一瓦尔特.本雅明首创“文化产业”概念,英国政府于1998年11月第一次提出了“创意产业”概念后,世界各国虽然已经陆续接受了“创意产业”的概念,但是由于各国文化传统和产业发展路径不同,导致对“创意产业”的具体称呼、产业范围等均存在一定的差异,比如美国将其定义为“版权产业”、德国将其定义为“文化产业”,而我国则于21世纪初提出“文化创意产业”概念。显然,“文化创意产业”是我国独创的概念,虽然它与英国的“创意产业”和美国的“版权产业”的分类上没有本质上的区分,但是范围也明显存在差异。本文提出文化创意产业是文化产业中的高端产业,是创意产业中的核心组成部分,是文化产业和创意产业的交集部分。文化创意产业和知识产权息息相关,文化创意产业的发展过程中将无法脱离知识产权的保护和制约。从世界主要国家对“创意产业”知识产权保护现状看,对文化创意产业的知识产权保护仅仅通过民法、行政法加以保护显然并不足够,知识产权的公权属性等决定对文化创意产业保护可以适用刑法,另外从刑法功能上看,刑法作为各种社会关系法律保护的最后屏障,只有与民事保护、行政保护组成法律保护网,才能真正发挥民事保护、行政保护的作用。对文化创意产业的刑法保护有必要性,同时也要注意适度性。另外,本文提出对文化创意产业的刑法保护,要从理念入手,形成由“弱保护”向“强保护”逐渐转变的刑法保护理念、刑法保护与其他法律保护相协调的刑法保护理念、保护权利人利益与维护公共利益相平衡的刑法保护理念等基本的保护理念；同时,本文针对文化创意产业的刑法保护存在的问题提出相关的建议,以期保护更有实效性。本文的主要研究成果如下： 1)提出文化创意产业是文化产业和创意产业的交集部分。通过阐述分析文化产业、创意产业、文化创意产业的概念和发展过程,厘清文化产业、创意产业、文化创意产业的关系。 2)提出文化创意产业发展与刑法保护关系密切。通过论述文化--产业—创意—知识产权—刑法关系,论证文化创意产业发展离不开知识产权保护,进而论证文化创意产业发展需要刑法介入保护。 3)提出文化创意产业刑法保护基本理念。理念先行,对文化创意产业的刑法保护,要从理念入手,形成由弱保护向强保护逐渐转变的刑法保护理念、刑法保护与其他法律保护相协调的刑法保护理念、保护权利人利益与维护公共利益相平衡的刑法保护理念等基本的保护理念；本文主要研究内容如下：首先,从文化创意产业发展符合中国经济社会发展需求入手,阐述文化创意产业在现今中国发展的必要性、时代性；其次,进一步厘清文化产业、创意产业、文化创意产业等相关概念,提出文化创意产业是文化产业中的高端产业,是创意产业中的核心组成部分,是文化产业和创意产业的交集部分的观点,其交易核心就是知识产权。第三,逐条论证文化创意产业的特征决定其离不开知识产权保护以及以动漫产业为例论证知识产权贯穿于文化创意产业始终,进而论证文化创意产业发展与知识产权保护密不可分。第四,以英国、美国、日本等代表性国家为例,阐述世界主要国家对创意产业(或者版权产业)的知识产权保护现状,继而阐述中国文化创意产业知识产权保护存在“对侵权者惩罚力度不够”等现状。第五,通过论证知识产权公权属性决定文化创意产业可以用刑法保护,进而论述文化创意产业刑法保护的必要性和适度性,并从中提出对文化创意产业刑法保护的基本理念及相关建议。结论部分简要归纳了论文研究的主要成果、结论、体会,给出了论文的创新点和不足之处,并对论文需要进一步研究的若干问题做了的展望。
[Abstract]:Culture is a kind of power, and cultural competitiveness is the core competitiveness of the country. Cultural and creative industries are the product of the integration of culture and economy. It is an industrial form combining culture, science and technology and creativity. It is the basic means of innovation, creation and creation, the core content of culture and creative achievements, and the new trade characteristics of intellectual property. The cultural and creative industry is not innate, it is the economic development to a certain extent, the state has developed to a certain period, the social progress to a certain stage of the emerging economic model. At present, the cultural and creative industry has become a new model of the world economic growth.
As early as 1926, Walter Walter Benjamin, one of the important representatives of the German Frankfurt school, first created the concept of "cultural industry". After the British government first proposed the concept of "creative industry" in November 1998, all countries in the world have accepted the concept of "creative industry", but because of the cultural traditions and industrial development of various countries. Different paths lead to certain differences in the specific name of "creative industry" and industrial scope, such as the definition of "copyright industry" by the United States. Germany defines it as "cultural industry", while China puts forward the concept of "cultural and creative industry" in the early twenty-first Century. Obviously, "cultural and creative industries" is the original concept of our country. Although it has no essential distinction between the "creative industry" in Britain and the classification of "copyright industry" in the United States, there are obvious differences in the scope. This paper suggests that cultural and creative industries are the high-end industries in the cultural industry, the core component of the creative industry, and the intersection of cultural and creative industries.
Cultural and creative industries are closely related to intellectual property rights, and the development process of cultural and creative industries will not be separated from the protection and restriction of intellectual property rights. From the status of intellectual property protection of "creative industries" in the world's major countries, the protection of intellectual property rights in cultural and creative industries only passes through civil law, and it is obviously not enough to protect the intellectual property rights of the cultural and creative industries. The public rights attribute of intellectual property right determines the application of criminal law to the protection of cultural and creative industries. In addition to the function of criminal law, criminal law is the last barrier of legal protection of various social relations. Only with civil protection and administrative protection, can the protection of civil affairs and administrative protection play a real role. It is necessary to protect the criminal law, and at the same time, we should pay attention to moderation.
In addition, this paper puts forward the protection of criminal law in cultural and creative industries. It is necessary to start with the concept, form the concept of criminal protection, which is gradually changed from "weak protection" to "strong protection", the concept of criminal protection which is coordinated by the protection of criminal law and other legal protection, and to protect the interests of the right people and the protection of the public interests in the criminal law protection concept. At the same time, this paper puts forward relevant suggestions for the problems existing in the criminal law protection of cultural and creative industries, with a view to protecting more effective results.
The main research results of this paper are as follows:
1) put forward that cultural and creative industries are the intersection of cultural industry and creative industry. Through the exposition and analysis of the concept and development process of cultural industry, creative industry, cultural and creative industries, the relationship between cultural industry, creative industry and cultural and creative industries is clarified.
2) the development of cultural and creative industries is closely related to the protection of criminal law. By discussing the relationship between culture, industry, creativity, intellectual property and criminal law, it is demonstrated that the development of cultural and creative industries can not be separated from the protection of intellectual property rights, and the development of cultural and creative industries needs to be protected by criminal law.
3) put forward the basic concept of criminal law protection in cultural and creative industries. First, to protect the criminal law of cultural and creative industries, we should start with the concept, form the concept of criminal law protection that gradually change from weak protection to strong protection, protect the criminal law from criminal law protection and other legal protection, protect the interests of the rights holders and balance the public interests. The concept of basic protection, such as the concept of criminal law protection, and so on;
The main contents of this paper are as follows:
First of all, starting from the development of cultural and creative industries in line with China's economic and social development needs, it expounds the necessity and the times of the development of cultural and creative industries in today's China.
Secondly, we should further clarify the concepts of cultural industry, creative industry, cultural and creative industry, and put forward that cultural and creative industries are the high-end industries in the cultural industry, the core component of the creative industry, the point of view of the intersection of cultural industry and creative industry, the core of which is intellectual property.
Third, demonstration of the characteristics of cultural and creative industries by one by one determines that it is inseparable from the protection of intellectual property rights and that the animation industry is taken as an example to demonstrate that intellectual property rights run through the cultural and creative industries, and that the development of cultural and creative industries and intellectual property protection are inseparable.
Fourth, take the representative countries such as Britain, the United States and Japan as examples to illustrate the current situation of intellectual property protection of the world's major countries on Creative Industries (or copyright industries), and then explain the existence of the "insufficient punishment for the infringers" in the intellectual property protection of the Chinese cultural and creative industries.
Fifth, through the demonstration of the property rights of intellectual property rights, the cultural and creative industries can be protected by criminal law, and the necessity and moderation of the criminal law protection in cultural and creative industries are discussed, and the basic concepts and relevant suggestions on the protection of criminal law in cultural and creative industries are put forward.
The conclusion part briefly summarizes the main achievements, conclusions and experiences of the paper, and gives the innovation and shortcomings of the paper, and makes a prospect for some problems that need further study.

【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】