专业能力研究的修辞学视角

发布时间：2017-12-27 12:06

本文关键词：专业能力研究的修辞学视角　出处：《厦门大学学报( 哲学社会科学版)》2013年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：从修辞学视角研究专业能力,有助于研究者冲破各个专门学科的藩篱,发现不同学科专业能力语言表征中隐藏的修辞共性。美国修辞学家哈特列斯从修辞学视角对专业能力的研究表明:专业能力实际上是修辞的建构物,可以说是一种独立的体裁。传统意义上的专业能力特指专家所拥有的知识和技能,哈氏认为,专业能力不仅指不同于别人的知识和技能,它本身还包含着争夺所有权和合法性的努力。从修辞学视角研究专业能力有两大优势,不仅可以整合劝说艺术和非艺术手段,还注重创造与表现的研究。影响辞性创造与表现的因素有修辞者的优秀品格、修辞者对身份与认同的追求和受众。尽管不同领域的专业能力有天壤之别,但其使用的修辞手段却有诸多共性。未来的研究应进一步对专业能力的修辞共性作探讨,发掘更多的共性,同时还应将已发现的共性在更多的专业领域中进行验证以确定其普遍性。
[Abstract]:Studying professional competence from rhetorical perspective helps researchers break through the barriers of various disciplines and find the rhetoric similarities hidden in different disciplines and professional abilities. American rhetorical scholar Hart Les's research on professional ability from rhetorical perspective shows that professional ability is actually a construction of rhetoric, and it can be regarded as an independent genre. In traditional sense, professional competence refers to knowledge and skills possessed by experts. Hakhus believes that professional competence is not only about knowledge and skills different from others, but also includes efforts to fight for ownership and legitimacy. The study of professional competence from the rhetorical perspective has two advantages, not only to integrate persuasive art and non art means, but also to focus on the research of creation and performance. The factors affecting the creation and expression of the rhetorical character include the outstanding character of the rhetorical, the pursuit of identity and identity by the rhetorical and the audience. Although the professional competence of different fields is different, the rhetorical devices used by them have many similarities. Future research should further explore the rhetorical generality of professional competence, explore more commonalities, and also identify the universals that have been found in more professional fields to confirm its universality.
【作者单位】：厦门大学外文学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“英美领导人在跨文化交际语境中的英文演讲之批评话语分析”(08BYY072)
【分类号】：H05
【正文快照】： 一、引言20世纪后期,修辞学领域出现了“探究的修辞学”(rhetoric of inquiry)转向。该转向“一方面固然是新修辞学运动的力量的向外渗透,另一方面无疑也是想替代‘探究的逻辑学(logic of inquiry)’”。[1]西蒙斯在《修辞学转向》的导论中明确指出,探究的修辞学的研究路径和

【参考文献】