形式化辞格的语用认知研究

发布时间：2018-04-11 17:45

本文选题：方式原则 + 象似性理论　；参考：《郑州大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：目前,在修辞研究领域,对于辞格的形式和意义两个方面,人们通常是关注意义而忽略形式。但在辞格的使用过程中,我们发现,辞格之所以能产生特定的修辞效果,不仅仅是因为字、词的选用和组合而造成的特殊语言意义的作用,有时候,当词语搭配和使用缺乏新意,但是却能以特定的形式组合起来的时候,也能产生各种各样的表达效果。为了探求辞格形式促进语言表达效果的原因,以及其中可能存在的语言‘学原理,我们决定对有特定形式的辞格进行研究。本文结合语用学和认知语言学的相关原理,针对反复、排比、对偶、层递、顶真、回环这几个常用的形式化辞格行分析,一方面可以补充以往尚未涉及到或者涉入尚浅的修辞学的相关领域,使辞格的本体研究得到进一步的深化,另一方面以辞格研究为例,我们尝试将修辞学与其他学科,特别是各种新兴的语言科学联系起来,进行跨学科的理论探索,从而发掘修辞学新的发展方向。本文主要涉及到了方式原则、象似性理论、格式塔、范畴、会话焦点转移、图形——背景等语用学和认知语言学的相关理论,通过对典型修辞实例的分析和研究,我们认为：形式化辞格通过遵守或违背方式原则的相关准则,可以达到各种特殊的表达效果；象似性理论与形式化辞洛的生成机制紧密结合,可以解释这些辞格的特殊形式是由于什么原因产生的,到底是单纯的语言因素的作用,还是另外涉及到了人们的心智因素；当从篇章的角度切入来研究辞格时,其表现出的谋篇布局、衔接上下文的功能又是如何借助格式塔、范畴、会话焦点转移、图形——背景等原理体现出来的,这也说明,对于同一个问题,我们可以从多角度出发,运用各种原理对其进行解释。在研究的过程中,我们不难发现,本文所涉及的几个原理有些存在着紧密的联系,如顺序象似性与方式原则中的“有条理”准则相通,范畴原理中的“家族相似性”与格式塔的相似原则相通,这也表明了语用学与认知语言学、认知语言学内部各原理之间都存在着错综复杂的关系。本文的实践证明将修辞学与其他语言科学结合起来进行研究是有很大发展空间的,长时间的修辞研究局限迫切要求我们寻求新的研究思路和研究方法,对于本文所产生的一些结论,目前我们还无法判断正确的成分有多少,需要改进和探究的地方还很多,但正是有这样可能性的出现才能促使我们在修辞学研究领域上进一步探索,从而得到更多的收获。
[Abstract]:At present, in the field of rhetorical research, people usually pay attention to meaning and neglect form.However, in the process of using rhetorical figures, we find that the specific rhetorical effects of rhetoric are not only due to the special linguistic meaning caused by the choice and combination of words, but also sometimes.When collocation and use of words lack of new ideas, but can be combined in a specific form, can also produce a variety of expressions.In order to find out the reason why the case form promotes the effect of language expression, and the possible linguistic 'theory, we decide to study the case with specific form.Based on the relevant principles of pragmatics and cognitive linguistics, this paper aims at the analysis of some commonly used formal rhetorical lines such as repetition, parallelism, duality, stratification, topmost truth, and return loop.On the one hand, we can supplement the previous related fields of rhetoric that have not been involved or involved in the superficial rhetoric, so as to further deepen the study of the ontology of rhetoric. On the other hand, taking the case study as an example, we try to combine rhetoric with other disciplines.Especially, all kinds of new language science are connected to explore the interdisciplinary theory, so as to explore the new development direction of rhetoric.This paper mainly deals with the relevant theories of pragmatics and cognitive linguistics, such as the principle of mode, iconicity theory, gestalt, category, conversational focus shift, graphic-background and so on, through the analysis and study of typical rhetorical examples.We believe that formal rhetoric can achieve a variety of special expressive effects by following or violating the relevant rules of the principle of mode; the iconicity theory is closely combined with the formation mechanism of formal rhetoric.It can be explained whether the special forms of these words are produced for what reason, whether they are the function of pure language factors or whether they relate to people's mental factors, and when they are studied from the perspective of text,It shows how the function of cohesion context is embodied by the principles of gestalt, category, conversation focus shift, graph-background, etc., which also shows that for the same problem, we can proceed from many angles.Use various principles to explain it.In the course of the study, it is not difficult to find that some of the principles involved in this paper are closely related, such as the similarity of sequence and the "organized" principle in the principle of mode.The "family similarity" in category principle is related to the similarity principle of Gestalt, which also shows that there are intricate relationships between pragmatics and cognitive linguistics, and between the principles of cognitive linguistics.The practice of this paper proves that there is a lot of room for development by combining rhetoric with other linguistic sciences, and the limitations of long time rhetoric research require us to seek new research ideas and methods.For some of the conclusions produced in this paper, we are not yet able to determine the correct composition, and there are still many areas to be improved and explored.But it is just the possibility that we can explore further in the field of rhetoric and gain more gains.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H05

【参考文献】