日韩学生“得”字补语句的习得对比

发布时间：2018-05-21 20:21

本文选题：“得”字补语句 + 日语　；参考：《复旦大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文通过比较“得”字补语句在日语和韩语中的对应,发现相比于韩语,日语在“得”字补语句上的对应和汉语更为接近,由此提出本文的习得假设。最后通过对输出情况和偏误情况的对比,证明大部分的句式和假设相符,小部分的句式可能受到其他因素的影响有所出入。因而,认为对比分析理论虽然有缺陷,但是对于汉语教学还是有指导意义的。同时,也希望在对外汉语教学中,研究者和教师都能够意识到日韩学生的习得差别,在教学中有区别地对待。本文共分为八章：第一章,引言,交代了选题的意义、材料来源、研究方法这些基本信息。第二章,相关研究综述,回顾了研究者在“得”的本体和二语教学方面的研究。第三章,“得”字补语句的分类。通过对“得”字补语句已有分类的分析讨论,结合教学,将“得”字补语句分为2两类11小类。第四章,“得”字补语句在日语和韩语中的对应形式。通过语言对比,发现日语和韩语在“得”字补语句句式对应上的不同点和相同点,并且据此提出本文的习得假设。第五章,日韩学生“得”字补语句输出情况分析及对比。分析日韩学生“得”字补语句各句式输出情况,并与本族语者的使用情况作对比,得出日本学生和韩国学生句式输出的一致和差异。第六章,日韩学生“得”字补语句使用偏误分析。对日韩学生在11个句式中出现的偏误进行分析并归类。最后在对比中发现他们的差异。第七章,习得假设的验证及教学建议。在这章中本文结合日韩学生“得”字补语句的输出和偏误来证明习得假设,最终大部分的句式得到了验证。第八章,结语。总结全文的主要内容,缺点与不足。
[Abstract]:By comparing the correspondence of "de" word complement in Japanese and Korean, it is found that the correspondence between Japanese and Chinese is closer to that in Chinese, and the acquisition hypothesis of this paper is put forward. Finally, by comparing the output and the error, it is proved that most of the sentence patterns are consistent with the hypothesis, and a few of the sentence patterns may be influenced by other factors. Therefore, the contrastive analysis theory has defects, but it still has guiding significance for Chinese teaching. At the same time, it is hoped that in teaching Chinese as a foreign language, both researchers and teachers can realize the differences in the acquisition of Japanese and Korean students and treat them differently in teaching. This paper is divided into eight chapters: The first chapter, introduction, explains the significance of the topic, material sources, research methods and these basic information. Chapter two, a review of relevant studies, reviews the researchers' research on Noumenon and L2 teaching. The third chapter, the classification of word complement sentence. Through the analysis and discussion of the existing classification of "de" word complement sentence and combining with teaching, the "get" word complement sentence can be divided into 2 types and 11 subcategories. The fourth chapter, the corresponding form of the word complement in Japanese and Korean. Through language comparison, we find the differences and similarities between Japanese and Korean in the sentence pattern correspondence of "de" word complement sentence, and put forward the acquisition hypothesis of this paper. The fifth chapter, the Japanese and Korean students'word complement sentence output analysis and comparison. This paper analyzes the output of each sentence pattern of "de" word complement sentence in Japanese and Korean students, and compares it with the use of native speakers, and concludes the consistency and difference of sentence pattern output between Japanese students and Korean students. Chapter VI, Japanese and Korean students "de" word complement sentence error analysis. This paper analyzes and classifies the errors of Japanese and Korean students in 11 sentence patterns. Finally, they were found to be different in comparison. Chapter 7, the verification of acquisition hypothesis and teaching suggestion. In this chapter, the author verifies the acquisition hypothesis by combining the output and bias of the "de" word complement sentence in Japanese and Korean students, and most of the sentence patterns are finally verified. Chapter eight, conclusion. Summarize the main contents, shortcomings and shortcomings of the full text.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H195

【相似文献】