“分别”与“分头”的多视角研究

发布时间：2018-05-25 18:47

本文选题：分别 + 分头　；参考：《南京师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：“分别”和“分头”作为一对近义情状副词,有时是可以通用的,但两词之间仍存在着不少差异,而且这些差异尚未得到深入的研究。本文拟在前人研究的基础上,采取形式与意义、统计与分析相结合的方法,从三个平面的角度对现代汉语情状副词“分别”和“分头”进行探讨和分析。全文除绪论和结论外,有三个部分。第一部分主要对“分别”与“分头”进行句法考察。这一章主要对情状副词“分别”和“分头”的句法分布、句法功能,以及与其他副词及情状副词的共现情况进行描写分析。通过分析,我们可知在句法分布上“分别”和“分头”一般没什么差异,但是“分头”在“是”字句和存现句中使用有一定限制。两词在句法功能上般位于动词性结构之前,作状语,只是“分别”较之“分头”还能修饰形式动词带宾语。“分别”和“分头”几乎可以与除程度副词外的其他各类副词连用共现,但是“分头”还不能和否定副词连用。在共现顺序上“分别”和“分头”往往是处于其他副词之后,与其他情状副词连用时,则往往遵循意志类时机类同独类依照类状态类方式类的顺序。第二部分先后考察了“分别”与“分头”的语义和语用。这一章首先在借鉴前人的释义和研究的基础上,梳理和归纳出二词的基本意义,并在此基础上对“分别”和“分头”句式的语义特征、语义角色以及语义指向进行分析。我们发现“分头”对于所指向的名词性成分的限制,包括这些名词性成分所充当的语义角色较“分别”严格。最后,本章还从语体和句类分布对“分别”和“分头”的语用特点进行了考察。第三部分进行“分别”的歧义考察。先从“分别”的歧义类型入手,考察出可能产生歧义的“分别”句式,然后分析“分别”歧义句产生的原因,最后本章立足于交际双方,从表达者和接受者的角度分别提出了消解歧义的办法。
[Abstract]:As a pair of synonymous adverbs, "separation" and "separation" can sometimes be generalized, but there are still many differences between the two words, and these differences have not been further studied. On the basis of previous studies, this paper discusses and analyzes the modern Chinese situation adverbs "separate" and "split head" from the perspective of three planes by means of the combination of form and meaning, statistics and analysis. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, there are three parts. The first part focuses on the syntactic investigation of "separate" and "split". This chapter mainly describes the syntactic distribution, syntactic function and co-occurrence with other adverbs and situation adverbs. Through analysis, we can see that there is no difference between "separate" and "split" in syntactic distribution, but the use of "split" in "is" and "existential" is limited to some extent. The two words are syntactically located before the verb structure and used as adverbial, but "separate" can modify the formal verb with object compared with "split". "separate" and "separate head" can almost be used with other adverbs except degree adverbs, but "separate head" can not be used with negative adverbs. In the order of co-occurrence, "separate" and "split" are often after other adverbs, and when they are used with other adverbs, they tend to follow the order of the will class, the opportunity class, and the unique class, according to the class state type. The second part examines the semantics and pragmatics of "separate" and "split". This chapter firstly summarizes the basic meaning of the two words on the basis of the previous interpretation and research, and then analyzes the semantic features, semantic roles and semantic direction of the sentence patterns of "separate" and "split". We find that the "split" is more restrictive to the noun elements, including the semantic roles played by the noun elements are more strict than that of the "separation". Finally, this chapter investigates the pragmatic characteristics of "separate" and "split" from the distribution of style and sentence category. The third part is to investigate the ambiguity of "separation". Starting with the ambiguity types of "separation", this paper investigates the sentence structure of "separation" which may produce ambiguity, and then analyzes the causes of "separate" ambiguous sentences. Finally, this chapter is based on both sides of communication. From the point of view of the speaker and the receiver, the method of resolving ambiguity is put forward respectively.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H146

【参考文献】