当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 汉语言论文 >

《广雅疏证》联绵词研究

发布时间:2018-06-07 17:49

  本文选题:《广雅疏证》 + 联绵词 ; 参考:《浙江师范大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:本文以《广雅疏证》中的联绵词及王念孙的疏证材料为研究对象,从四个方面加以研究。不包括绪论和总结,本文共分为五个部分。 第一部分先回顾了古代文献中与联绵词相关的术语及其所指,了解到传统的关于联绵词的观念与现代的认识是不同的;然后对现代学术界给联绵词所下的一些代表性定义加以综述,认识到联绵词是双音节单纯词的学术界基本看法,并且引述了近些年在联绵词界定问题上的一些成果;最后以描述性的语言,对联绵词作一个界定。 第二部分先用定性和定量两个角度对《广雅疏证》中的联绵词进行了穷尽性的调查与统计,并考查了其文献来源;然后从补充《广雅》脱漏与纠正《广雅》讹误两个方而对《广雅疏证》关于《广雅》联绵词的校勘情况予以统计说明。 第三部分从《广雅疏证》有关联绵词的疏证材料出发,重点探讨了古代联绵词的三大来源:同义复合词、单音节词、天然的联绵词;在这三者的基础上发现了联绵词与单音节词声近义通现象,并对这种现象作了具体探讨与分析,尤其是对可能来源于上古复辅音声母的联绵词作了重点的分析研究。 第四部分共分四节,前三节主要举例介绍了王念孙在《广雅疏证》中训释联绵词时所采用的三种方法,它们分别是:以声音为线索疏证联绵词、辨明文字异体以疏证联绵词和通过类比手法疏证联绵词;第四节则分析了《广雅疏证》在联绵词训释方法上所做出的贡献及其不足。 第五部分简略地对《广雅疏证》在联绵词校诂过程中的相关问题进行研究,主要包括两个方面:其一是从三个方而举例介绍了王念孙在校诂联绵词过程中对前人之说的纠正,其二则是举例略谈我们在研习《广雅疏证》过程中发现的两个校诂问题。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the Lianmianci in Guangya and Wang Niansun are studied from four aspects. Not including the introduction and summary, this paper is divided into five parts. The first part reviews the terms related to Lianmiao ci in the ancient literature, and finds out that the traditional concept of Lianmiao ci is different from the modern understanding. Then it summarizes some representative definitions of Lianmianci in the modern academic circles, and recognizes that it is the basic view of the academic circles of disyllabic simple words, and cites some achievements on the definition of Lianmianzi in recent years. In the second part, the author makes an exhaustive investigation and statistics on the Lianxianzi in Guang Ya Shu Zheng (Guang Ya Shu) by qualitative and quantitative analysis, and examines its source of literature. Then, from the two sides of supplementing "Guangya" and correcting "Guangya" error, the author gives a statistical explanation on the collation of "Guangya" and "Guangya". The third part starts from the "Guangya" and "Guangya". In this paper, three major sources of synonymous compound words, monosyllabic words and natural conjunctive words are discussed, and on the basis of these three kinds of words, the phenomenon of synonymous words and monosyllabic words is found, and this phenomenon is discussed and analyzed in detail. The fourth part is divided into four sections. The first three sections mainly introduce the three methods used in Wang Niansun's interpretation of the consonant ci in Guang Ya Shu Zheng. They are as follows: the sound is the clue to the synonym, the second is to distinguish the characters, the other is the synonym, and the analogies are used to the synonym; In the fourth section, we analyze the contribution and deficiency of Guangya Shuzheng in the explanation method of Lianmian ci. In the fifth part, we briefly study the related problems in the process of Lianmian ci. It mainly includes two aspects: the first is to introduce Wang Niansun's correction of the former's theory in the process of combining the words in the school from three sides, and the other is to give an example about two problems found in the course of our study of Guangya and Shuzheng.
【学位授予单位】:浙江师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:H131.4

【引证文献】

相关期刊论文 前1条

1 李福言;;近三十年《广雅疏证》研究述论[J];湖北文理学院学报;2013年09期



本文编号:1992156

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/1992156.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户aad5d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com