及物性与语篇建构—系统功能语法视角
发布时间:2018-06-11 12:48
本文选题:及物性 + 语篇构建 ; 参考:《西南大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:系统功能语法将语言视为一个包括语义、词汇语法和音系/字系的多层次系统,各层次之间依次存在体现关系,即语义由词汇语法体现,词汇语法由音系/字系体现。因此,本研究认为作为语义单位的语篇也是由诸如及物性、语气和主述位等词汇语法资源体现的。但是,目前为止,学术界还没有完善系统的研究探讨作为语义单位的语篇是如何由词汇语法资源实现的。有鉴于此,本文拟基于语言的体现原则,探究词汇语法,尤其是及物性系统,与语篇建构的关系。 本研究的首要任务是对“语篇建构”这一概念进行理论描述和定义。在系统功能语法看来,语篇是对语言系统意义潜势示例和体现的结果,是概念意义、人际意义和语篇意义的载体;语篇建构要求说话人根据有关的语境因素从语言系统所提供的各种意义潜势中做出选择,并通过恰当的词汇语法资源将之实例化。本研究据此将语篇建构定义为是由词汇语法手段实现的概念意义、人际意义和语篇意义三位一体的动态的语义体现过程。在对语篇建构这一语义建构过程的理论描述基础之上,本文从语篇语义视角,根据词汇语法和语篇语义之间存在的体现关系,着重探讨及物性系统的语篇建构功能。 本研究认为,及物性在将语言系统意义潜势实例化为语篇的过程中扮演着重要角色。在体现语篇语义的过程中,及物性不仅能够体现概念意义,它还具有体现人际意义和语篇意义的潜势。具体地说,及物性的语篇建构功能主要体现在以下三个方面:1)及物性是对经验的识解,把现实世界中的经验建构在语篇中,体现概念意义;2)及物性系统与语气系统相互作用,同时作为一种语篇评价资源,使得及物性具有建构人际意义的潜势;3)及物性与主位结构密切联系,同时及物性过程参与者的选择也与语篇的衔接密切相关,参与者追踪有助于确立语篇衔接链,因而它也具有建构语篇意义的潜势。 通过实例分析,本研究发现及物性在语篇各个语义分支建构过程中起着至关重要的作用,它不仅能够建构概念意义,它还同时具有建构人际意义和语篇意义的潜势。最后,本文构拟出了及物性与语篇建构的关系示意图,以揭示及物性在语篇建构中的重要意义:
[Abstract]:The system functional grammar regards language as a multi-level system which includes semantics, lexical grammar and phonology / character system, in turn, there exists the embodiment relation among the different levels, that is, semantic is embodied by lexical grammar and lexical grammar by phonology / character system. Therefore, the present study holds that discourse as a semantic unit is also reflected by lexical and grammatical resources such as transitivity, mood and theme. However, up to now, there has been no systematic research into how discourse, as a semantic unit, is realized by lexical and grammatical resources. In view of this, this thesis intends to explore the relationship between lexical grammar, especially the transitivity system, and discourse construction based on the principles of language. The primary task of this study is to theoretically describe and define the concept of "discourse construction". From the perspective of systemic functional grammar, discourse is the result of examples and embodiments of the potential of systematic meaning in language, and it is the carrier of conceptual meaning, interpersonal meaning and textual meaning. Discourse construction requires the speaker to choose from the various meanings offered by the language system according to the relevant contextual factors and to instantiate them through appropriate lexical and grammatical resources. According to the present study, discourse construction is defined as a dynamic semantic representation process in which conceptual meaning, interpersonal meaning and textual meaning are realized by lexical and grammatical means. Based on the theoretical description of the process of discourse construction, this paper, from the perspective of discourse semantics, analyzes the relationship between lexical grammar and discourse semantics. The present study argues that transitivity plays an important role in the process of instantiating the meaning potential of a language system into a discourse. In the process of embodying textual semantics, transitivity can not only embody conceptual meaning, but also embody the potential of interpersonal meaning and textual meaning. Specifically, the textual construction function of transitivity is mainly embodied in the following three aspects: 1) and transitivity is the interpretation of experience, which constructs the experience in the real world in the discourse, and embodies the conceptual meaning 2) and the interaction between the transitivity system and the mood system. As a discourse evaluation resource, transitivity has the potential to construct interpersonal meaning, and the transitivity is closely related to the thematic structure, and the choice of the participants in the transitivity process is also closely related to the cohesion of the discourse. Participant tracing helps to establish the cohesion chain of a text, so it also has the potential to construct the meaning of a text. Through the case study, this study finds that transitivity plays an important role in the construction of each semantic branch of the text. It not only can construct conceptual meaning, but also has the potential to construct interpersonal meaning and textual meaning. Finally, the thesis draws up a schematic diagram of the relationship between transitivity and discourse construction in order to reveal the significance of transitivity in discourse construction.
【学位授予单位】:西南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:H04
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘立华;刘世生;;语篇建构的互动视角[J];国外外语教学;2006年03期
2 张俊,苗兴伟;述位与语篇建构[J];解放军外国语学院学报;2005年04期
3 王振华;;作为系统的语篇[J];外语学刊;2008年03期
4 柴改英,任大玲;语篇的互动性研究[J];四川外语学院学报;2003年02期
5 刘承宇;概念隐喻与人际隐喻级转移的逆向性[J];外语教学与研究;2005年04期
6 苗兴伟;;否定结构的语篇功能[J];外语教学与研究;2011年02期
7 杨信彰;语篇中的评价性手段[J];外语与外语教学;2003年01期
8 王振华;“物质过程”的评价价值——以分析小说人物形象为例[J];外国语(上海外国语大学学报);2004年05期
9 陆丹云;;英语双及物结构的多义性探析——系统功能语言学的视角[J];外国语(上海外国语大学学报);2010年03期
10 张蕾;苗兴伟;;评价意义的语篇建构功能[J];西安外国语大学学报;2010年03期
,本文编号:2005298
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2005298.html