当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 汉语言论文 >

马来西亚华文独立中学《初中华文》教材分析及评价

发布时间:2018-06-25 08:09

  本文选题:马来西亚 + 华文独中 ; 参考:《天津大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:《初中华文》教材是马来西亚华校董事联合总会(简称董总)出版的第三套华文教科书。在总结单元式《华文》教材教学实验成果的基础上,也为了实践2000年修订的《马来西亚华文独中初中华文课程纲要》的目标而出版。2004至2006年逐年替换完毕,三年共六册,供全国独中初中学生使用。在独中,华文是基础工具学科,作为第一语文教学。 本文研究是针对独中《初中华文》六册教材及光盘使用做出分析及评价。研究方法包括文献研究法、问卷调查法等,且运用综合、归纳的思维方式对教材进行全面的分析,得出教材特色及需要改进的地方,作为未来独中华文教材改革的参考。 全文共分为七个章节,分别为:第一章前言;第二章是了解教材定位及参考中欧美国教材评价成果,从而确立教材评价维度,以作为教材分析指标及综合评析指标;第三章针对教材编排结构及编排制作水平进行探讨;第四章是对教材内容进行分析,包括正文系统、语文知识与应用、练习与实践系统及助读系统;第五章为选文系统,针对选文主题进行分析探讨,同时也比较第一套至第三套《初中华文》的本土选文,最后一节则探讨与中国人教版相同的篇章;第六章则是问卷调查分析及结果;第七章是对教材的综合评价及改革建议。 通过分析,认为教材能力训练点具有科学性及实用性,语文知识体现华文科知识体系;练习题的适切性需加以探讨,,学生搜集和处理信息的能力培养不明显;助读系统促进“教本”与“学本”统一,但趣味性不足。选文主题体现传统价值观,但生活时代气息表现不明显等等。在本文最后一章节尝试对教材提出认为可行的改革建议,认为教材应兼顾多元文化的特色、增加教材的时代性、趣味性、动态性、弹性、改善教材支离破碎的知识点、编写水平也要加以改进、练习题应考虑学生的认知水平等等。
[Abstract]:The junior high school Chinese textbook is the third set of Chinese textbooks published by the Chinese School Board of Malaysia. On the basis of summing up the experimental results of the teaching of unit "Chinese" teaching materials, and in order to implement the goal of the 2000 revision of the "Chinese Curriculum outline for Junior Middle Schools in Malaysian Chinese Independent Middle School", the publication of .2004-2006 has been replaced year by year, with a total of six volumes in three years. For the use of junior high school students. In primary school, Chinese is the basic tool subject, as the first language teaching. This study is to analyze and evaluate the usage of six textbooks and CD-ROMs. The research methods include literature research, questionnaire survey and so on, and the comprehensive and inductive thinking mode is used to analyze the teaching materials in an all-round way. The characteristics of the textbooks and the areas that need to be improved are obtained, which can be used as the reference for the future reform of the only Chinese language textbooks in the future. The full text is divided into seven chapters: the first chapter is the preface, the second chapter is to understand the orientation of the textbooks and to refer to the evaluation results of Central Europe and the United States, so as to establish the dimension of textbook evaluation, as a textbook analysis index and comprehensive evaluation index; The third chapter discusses the structure of the textbook arrangement and the level of the arrangement production; the fourth chapter analyzes the content of the textbook, including the text system, language knowledge and application, practice and practice system and reading aid system; chapter five is the text selection system, the third chapter is the analysis of the content of the textbook, including the text system, the language knowledge and application, the practice system and the reading system At the same time, it also compares the first set to the third set of "junior high school Chinese", the last section is to explore the same chapter as the Chinese version, the sixth chapter is the questionnaire analysis and results; The seventh chapter is the comprehensive evaluation of teaching materials and reform proposals. Through analysis, it is concluded that the training point of teaching material ability is scientific and practical, and that Chinese knowledge reflects the knowledge system of Chinese liberal arts, the appropriateness of exercises should be discussed, and the ability of students to collect and deal with information is not obvious. The reading aid system promotes the unification of teaching and learning, but it is not interesting enough. The theme of selecting articles embodies traditional values, but the breath of life times is not obvious and so on. In the last chapter of this paper, I try to put forward some reform suggestions that are feasible to the teaching material, and think that the textbook should take into account the characteristics of multiculturalism, increase the times, interest, dynamics, flexibility of the textbook, and improve the fragmented knowledge point of the textbook. Writing level should also be improved, exercises should consider the cognitive level of students and so on.
【学位授予单位】:天津大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:H195

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 洪丽芬;庄惠善;;马来西亚华文教育问题:华小学生写作水平低的原因[J];八桂侨刊;2011年02期

2 梁志喜;康叶钦;;国内外英语教材评价研究述评[J];当代教育论坛(综合版);2010年02期

3 丁朝蓬;教科书结构分析与内容质量评价[J];教育理论与实践;2001年08期

4 高凌飚;教材分析评估的模型和层次[J];课程.教材.教法;2001年03期

5 韩宏宇;;关于语文学科的思维训练问题[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1993年04期

6 高凌飚;;教材评价维度与标准[J];教育发展研究;2007年12期



本文编号:2065254

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2065254.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e9b06***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com