从评价理论看《我们约会吧》男女嘉宾的性别建构

发布时间：2018-07-12 12:55

本文选题：性别 + 评价理论　；参考：《中国海洋大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：性别与语言研究有很长的历史。有的学者按照性别与语言研究采用的不同方法将其分为四类：缺陷法，统治法，差异法和社会建构法。前三种方法都基于相同的认识论：性别本质主义二元论。这种观点认为男人和女人本质上生来不同。那些用这种认识论指导性别用语言研究的学者都试图寻找男女在语言使用方面的差异。他们只在对差异的解释方面不同。性别与语言研究中的社会建构论基于一种全然不同的认识论，它认为性别是一种社会建构。根据这种观点，男人可以展现女性风格，女人也可以展现阳刚之气；性别不是静止的、一成不变的，而是在不断地动态建构之中。当排除了性别本质主义二元论的偏见之后，采用社会建构论方法进行的性别语言研究发现男人和女人在语言的使用上是相似的。评价理论是从系统功能语言学的三大元功能之一人际功能发展而来的。它关注文章或者说话人如何运用语言手段进行评价，，表达态度，协商人际立场和观点。自从评价理论诞生以来，它被广泛的应用于各种语域和文本。本论文运用评价理论作为分析框架，从社会建构论的角度分析了时下流行的相亲节目—《我们约会吧》中男女嘉宾的话语转写文本。主要研究男女嘉宾在电视相亲语域中在态度、介入和极差的使用数量方面是否有显著差异。此外，文章还主要列举了汉语中实现评价的词汇资源。本研究采用了定量与定性相结合的研究方法。文章首先统计了20位女嘉宾和20位男嘉宾话语中出现的态度、介入和极差数量，然后将数据输入了“统计产品与服务解决方案”软件（SPSS）中进行正态分布检验和独立样本T检验来看男女嘉宾在态度、介入和极差的使用方面是否存在显著差异。另外，作为定量分析的补充，定性分析列举和解释了文本中出现的态度、介入和极差资源。研究发现，《我们约会吧》场上男女嘉宾的话语在态度、介入和极差的使用方面不存在显著差异。由于本论文从社会建构论的角度研究了性别与语言，它排除了性别本质主义二元论的偏见。本论文的研究语料是时下流行的相亲类电视节目《我们约会吧》，揭示了男女嘉宾在相亲这个特殊的语境中，在态度表达及协商人际观点方面的性别建构。
[Abstract]:The study of gender and language has a long history. Some scholars have divided them into four categories according to the different methods of gender and language study: defect law, rule law, difference law and social construction. The first three methods are based on the same Epistemology: Gender Essentialism dualism. This view holds that men and women are essentially different. The scholars who use this epistemology to guide gender studies have tried to find differences in the use of men and women in the use of language. They are only different in the interpretation of differences. The social constructivism in gender and language studies is based on a completely different epistemology, which believes that sex is a social construction. By this view, men can In order to show the feminine style, women can also show masculinity; sex is not static and unchangeable, but in constant dynamic construction. After the prejudice of gender essentialism dualism, the gender language study of social constructivism is similar to the use of men and women in the use of language.
Evaluation theory is developed from one of the three major functions of systemic functional linguistics. It pays attention to how the article or speaker uses linguistic means to evaluate, express attitude, and negotiate interpersonal standpoints and views. Since the birth of the evaluation theory, it has been widely used in various registers and texts.
This paper uses the theory of evaluation as an analytical framework, and analyzes the current popular dating program from the perspective of social constructivism, the discourse transliteration text of the male and female guests in our dating bar. The main study is whether there are significant differences in attitudes, intervention and extreme use of men and women in the TV matchmaking language. This paper mainly lists the lexical resources to achieve evaluation in Chinese.
In this study, a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods is used. First, the article statistics the attitude, intervention and extreme number of 20 female guests and 20 male guest speakers, and then the data are entered into the "statistical product and service solution" software (SPSS) for normal distribution test and independent sample T test to see the male and female guests. There are significant differences in attitude, intervention and extreme use. In addition, as a supplement to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis enumerates and explains the attitude, intervention and extreme resources that appear in the text.
The study found that there is no significant difference in attitude, intervention and extreme use of the words of the men and women on the field. Because this paper studies gender and language from the perspective of social constructivism, it excludes the prejudice of the gender essentialist dualism. Let's date. It reveals gender construction in terms of attitude expression and interpersonal negotiation in the special context of blind date.
【学位授予单位】：中国海洋大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H13

【参考文献】