《毛诗正义》语言观研究
发布时间：2018-09-08 07:48
【摘要】：《毛诗正义》是孔颖达主撰的《五经正义》之一，作为唐代以前《诗经》研究的总结性著作，其中蕴涵着丰富的语言学材料，对其进行挖掘和整理对于中国语言学史的研究是大有裨益的。本文即以《毛诗正义》为主要研究材料，综合运用训诂学、音韵学、词汇学、文字学、语法学、修辞学等学科的理论，深入探讨分析了《毛诗正义》所蕴含的语言观念，全文分六个部分进行论述： 绪论部分对《毛诗正义》的语言研究现状作了简要介绍，同时阐述了本选题的研究意义。 第一章介绍了毛诗正义的成书及体例，并从总体上概括了《毛诗正义》的注疏原则，这些原则贯穿于整部书，赋予了《毛诗正义》融贯通博的特征。 第二章是《毛诗正义》语言观研究的核心，从词汇观入手，主要从四个方面、三种方法、两种方式、两个角度来进行分析，训释词义的内容主要有：进而申述毛传、郑笺，探求“得名之由”，以今语释古语，以方俗证通语，区分“一词多义”；探求词义的方法主要有：形训、声训、义训等；词义演变的方式主要有：引申、连类取义；辨析同义词分为：对文、散文，“同”中“析”异，以展示词义之间异中有同、同中见异的关系。 第三章集中展示了《毛诗正义》在语法观念上的成就，，既表现在对词类的认识上，也反映在对句法的推敲上，也体现在对“文势”的重视上。首先孔氏以“为义”、“不为义”为标准区分了实词和虚词，其次从语序和省略成分上挖掘出一定的句法观念，还自觉地结合着“文势”来阐释经义。 第四章透过《毛诗正义》中的修辞现象和理论，进一步探讨了其对几类修辞格和“比兴”理论的认识。 结语部分归纳出孔颖达在《毛诗正义》中所反映出的语言思想，确立了其在中国语言研究史上的学术地位。
[Abstract]:"Justice in Mao Poetry" is one of the "Justice of the five Classics" written by Kong Ying-da. As a summative work on the study of the Book of songs before the Tang Dynasty, it contains rich linguistic materials. It is of great benefit to the study of Chinese linguistic history to excavate and organize it. Based on the theory of exegetics, phonology, lexicology, philology, rhetoric and so on, this paper makes a thorough analysis of the linguistic concepts contained in Mao Poetry Justice. The full text is divided into six parts: the introduction briefly introduces the present situation of the language research in Mao Poetry Justice, and expounds the significance of the research on this topic. The first chapter introduces the book and style of the justice of Mao poetry, and generalizes the principle of "justice of Mao poetry", which runs through the whole book and endows the character of "justice of Mao poem". The second chapter is the core of the study of "Mao Poetry Justice" language view, from the perspective of vocabulary, mainly from four aspects, three methods, two ways, two angles to analyze, the main content of explaining the meaning of words are: then explain Mao Zhuan, Zheng Jian, In order to find out the reason of getting the name, to interpret the ancient language with the present language, to distinguish the polysemy of the word from the common language, to find the meaning of the word, the main methods are: form training, sound training, meaning training and so on, the way of word meaning evolvement mainly includes: extension, even category taking meaning; The synonyms can be divided into two parts: text, prose, "same" and "same" in order to show the relationship between the meaning of different and the same. The third chapter focuses on the achievements in the grammatical concept of Mao's Poems Justice, which are reflected in the understanding of parts of speech, in the examination of syntax, and in the emphasis on Wen Shi. Firstly, Kong distinguishes between notional words and function words according to the criteria of "meaning" and "non-righteousness". Secondly, he excavates certain syntactic concepts from word order and ellipsis, and consciously interprets the meaning of the scripture by combining "text potential". In Chapter four, through the rhetoric phenomenon and theory in Mao Poetry Justice, the author further discusses his understanding of several kinds of rhetorical devices and the theory of "Bi Xing". The conclusion concludes the linguistic thoughts reflected by Kong Ying-da in Mao's Poems and establishes his academic status in the history of Chinese language research.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：I207.22;H109.2
本文编号：2229860
[Abstract]:"Justice in Mao Poetry" is one of the "Justice of the five Classics" written by Kong Ying-da. As a summative work on the study of the Book of songs before the Tang Dynasty, it contains rich linguistic materials. It is of great benefit to the study of Chinese linguistic history to excavate and organize it. Based on the theory of exegetics, phonology, lexicology, philology, rhetoric and so on, this paper makes a thorough analysis of the linguistic concepts contained in Mao Poetry Justice. The full text is divided into six parts: the introduction briefly introduces the present situation of the language research in Mao Poetry Justice, and expounds the significance of the research on this topic. The first chapter introduces the book and style of the justice of Mao poetry, and generalizes the principle of "justice of Mao poetry", which runs through the whole book and endows the character of "justice of Mao poem". The second chapter is the core of the study of "Mao Poetry Justice" language view, from the perspective of vocabulary, mainly from four aspects, three methods, two ways, two angles to analyze, the main content of explaining the meaning of words are: then explain Mao Zhuan, Zheng Jian, In order to find out the reason of getting the name, to interpret the ancient language with the present language, to distinguish the polysemy of the word from the common language, to find the meaning of the word, the main methods are: form training, sound training, meaning training and so on, the way of word meaning evolvement mainly includes: extension, even category taking meaning; The synonyms can be divided into two parts: text, prose, "same" and "same" in order to show the relationship between the meaning of different and the same. The third chapter focuses on the achievements in the grammatical concept of Mao's Poems Justice, which are reflected in the understanding of parts of speech, in the examination of syntax, and in the emphasis on Wen Shi. Firstly, Kong distinguishes between notional words and function words according to the criteria of "meaning" and "non-righteousness". Secondly, he excavates certain syntactic concepts from word order and ellipsis, and consciously interprets the meaning of the scripture by combining "text potential". In Chapter four, through the rhetoric phenomenon and theory in Mao Poetry Justice, the author further discusses his understanding of several kinds of rhetorical devices and the theory of "Bi Xing". The conclusion concludes the linguistic thoughts reflected by Kong Ying-da in Mao's Poems and establishes his academic status in the history of Chinese language research.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：I207.22;H109.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 孙雪萍;;论孔颖达对魏晋南北朝《诗经》学的整合[J];齐鲁学刊;2008年03期
2 吴福祥;《毛传》的词义辨析[J];青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1990年01期
3 杨云香;;《尚书正义》反映的词汇观探索[J];西南大学学报(社会科学版);2009年06期
4 乔东义;;孔颖达的互文修辞观发微[J];修辞学习;2007年01期
本文编号：2229860
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2229860.html
