《抱朴子》疑问句研究
发布时间：2018-11-18 20:20
【摘要】：《抱朴子》,东晋葛洪著,分内、外篇两部分,是重要的中古汉语研究材料,特别是其《内篇》多时代感强的口语语料。目前对《抱朴子》语言的研究还不够深入,对于其疑问句的研究更是薄弱。故选取《抱朴子》中的疑问句作为研究对象,对其进行静态描写与对比分析,揭示《抱朴子》一书的疑问句特色,力图为汉语语法史与句法史的建设做出一些努力。 论文主要内容如下： 绪论部分介绍葛洪及《抱朴子》其人其书,梳理中古汉语疑问句研究成果,并对《抱朴子》语料及研究方法作简要说明。 第一章到第二章,《抱朴子》疑问句概貌描写。总结各家疑问句的分类方法,结合《抱朴子》语料的特点,将疑问句分为询问句和反问句两部分,再根据每一类问句的句法语义特点进行再分类。通过研究发现：询问句中是非问句主要借助疑问语气词表达,有使用语气副词和不使用语气副词两种情况；正反问句沿用“VP-Neg”格式；选择问句有范围选择问句和列项选择问句两类；特指问句使用了一些中古新生新兴的疑问词语,如“云何”、“何缘”等。反问句数量多,类型多样。 第三章,《抱朴子》疑问句中疑问词使用情况。疑问词包括疑问代词、疑问副词和疑问语气词三部分,疑问词的使用表现为与疑问句类型相对应。其中,疑问代词主要用于特指问句和反问句的构成,疑问副词集中用于反问句中,而语气词则参与各种疑问句型的构成,表达多种疑问语气。疑问代词以“何”的使用为代表,疑问副词大量使用“岂”“可”,语气词有单用和连用两种形式。总体特点是兼收并蓄,呈过渡状态。 第四章,《抱朴子》疑问句对比研究。选取中古时期有代表性的中土文献《论衡》、《世说新语》、《颜氏家训》等进行历时比较,揭示《抱朴子》疑问句在历时发展中的特点,具体表现为：①《抱朴子》疑问句类型齐全,体系完备。②《抱朴子》疑问句的历时汉语中的过渡性质。
[Abstract]:Bao Puzi, by GE Hong in the Eastern Jin Dynasty, divided into two parts, is an important research material of Middle Ancient Chinese, especially its oral materials which have a strong sense of the times. At present, the research on the language of Pu Puzi is not deep enough, and the research on its interrogative sentence is even weaker. Therefore, the interrogative sentence in Huo Puzi is selected as the object of study, and its static description and comparative analysis are carried out to reveal the features of the interrogative sentence in the book, in order to make some efforts for the construction of the history of Chinese grammar and syntax. The main contents of the thesis are as follows: the introduction part introduces GE Hong and Bao Puzi's book, combs the research achievements of the middle ancient Chinese interrogative sentences, and briefly explains the corpus and research methods. Chapter one to Chapter two, the description of question sentences. This paper summarizes the classification methods of each interrogative sentence and classifies the interrogative sentence into two parts: interrogative sentence and rhetorical question sentence according to the characteristics of the corpus, and then reclassifies the interrogative sentence according to the syntactic and semantic characteristics of each type of question sentence. Through the research, it is found that the right and wrong question sentences in interrogative sentences are mainly expressed by interrogative mood adverbs, and there are two situations in which mood adverbs are used and mood adverbs are not used, while positive and negative questions are in the form of "VP-Neg". There are two types of selective questions: selective question and item selective question, especially the question uses some new and emerging interrogative words, such as "cloud", "what's the fate" and so on. The number of rhetorical sentences is many and the types are various. The third chapter is about the use of interrogative words in the interrogative sentence. Interrogative words include interrogative pronouns, interrogative adverbs and interrogative modal words. The use of interrogative words corresponds to the type of interrogative sentences. Among them, interrogative pronouns are mainly used in the formation of specific questions and rhetorical questions, interrogative adverbs are mainly used in rhetorical questions, while modal pronouns participate in the formation of various interrogative sentence patterns and express various interrogative moods. The interrogative pronoun is represented by the use of "he", the interrogative adverb uses "whether" or "can" extensively, and the mood word has two forms: single use and combination. The overall characteristics are eclectic, transition state. Chapter four: a Contrastive study of Questionals in Huo Puzi. In order to reveal the characteristics of the diachronic development of the interrogative sentences in the Diachronic period, the representative middle earth literature of the Middle Ancient period, "Luoheng", "Shi Shuo Xin Yu", "Yan's Family instructions" and so on, were selected for diachronic comparison. The concrete manifestations are as follows: (1) the interrogative sentences are of complete types and the system is complete. 2 the transitive nature of the interrogative sentences in the diachronic Chinese.
【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H141
本文编号：2341103
[Abstract]:Bao Puzi, by GE Hong in the Eastern Jin Dynasty, divided into two parts, is an important research material of Middle Ancient Chinese, especially its oral materials which have a strong sense of the times. At present, the research on the language of Pu Puzi is not deep enough, and the research on its interrogative sentence is even weaker. Therefore, the interrogative sentence in Huo Puzi is selected as the object of study, and its static description and comparative analysis are carried out to reveal the features of the interrogative sentence in the book, in order to make some efforts for the construction of the history of Chinese grammar and syntax. The main contents of the thesis are as follows: the introduction part introduces GE Hong and Bao Puzi's book, combs the research achievements of the middle ancient Chinese interrogative sentences, and briefly explains the corpus and research methods. Chapter one to Chapter two, the description of question sentences. This paper summarizes the classification methods of each interrogative sentence and classifies the interrogative sentence into two parts: interrogative sentence and rhetorical question sentence according to the characteristics of the corpus, and then reclassifies the interrogative sentence according to the syntactic and semantic characteristics of each type of question sentence. Through the research, it is found that the right and wrong question sentences in interrogative sentences are mainly expressed by interrogative mood adverbs, and there are two situations in which mood adverbs are used and mood adverbs are not used, while positive and negative questions are in the form of "VP-Neg". There are two types of selective questions: selective question and item selective question, especially the question uses some new and emerging interrogative words, such as "cloud", "what's the fate" and so on. The number of rhetorical sentences is many and the types are various. The third chapter is about the use of interrogative words in the interrogative sentence. Interrogative words include interrogative pronouns, interrogative adverbs and interrogative modal words. The use of interrogative words corresponds to the type of interrogative sentences. Among them, interrogative pronouns are mainly used in the formation of specific questions and rhetorical questions, interrogative adverbs are mainly used in rhetorical questions, while modal pronouns participate in the formation of various interrogative sentence patterns and express various interrogative moods. The interrogative pronoun is represented by the use of "he", the interrogative adverb uses "whether" or "can" extensively, and the mood word has two forms: single use and combination. The overall characteristics are eclectic, transition state. Chapter four: a Contrastive study of Questionals in Huo Puzi. In order to reveal the characteristics of the diachronic development of the interrogative sentences in the Diachronic period, the representative middle earth literature of the Middle Ancient period, "Luoheng", "Shi Shuo Xin Yu", "Yan's Family instructions" and so on, were selected for diachronic comparison. The concrete manifestations are as follows: (1) the interrogative sentences are of complete types and the system is complete. 2 the transitive nature of the interrogative sentences in the diachronic Chinese.
【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H141
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 董玉芝;《抱朴子》复音词在现代汉语中的变化[J];西部学坛;1998年01期
2 刘光明;;《颜氏家训》疑问句考察[J];池州学院学报;2007年06期
3 郭锡良;先秦语气词新探(二)[J];古汉语研究;1989年01期
4 江蓝生;疑问副词“可”探源[J];古汉语研究;1990年03期
5 刘晓南;先秦语气词的历时多义现象[J];古汉语研究;1991年03期
6 刘钊;《抱朴子内篇校释》断句误一例[J];古汉语研究;1994年04期
7 董玉芝;《抱朴子》复音词构词方式初探[J];古汉语研究;1994年04期
8 石锓;论疑问词“何”的功能渗透[J];古汉语研究;1997年04期
9 王华;;解读古汉语副词“独”[J];晋中学院学报;2006年05期
10 段业辉;《世说新语》疑问句分析[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);1998年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李娜;《抱朴子》反义词研究[D];山东师范大学;2003年
2 成妍;《抱朴子内篇》词汇研究[D];南京师范大学;2005年
3 田美;《说苑》疑问句研究[D];山东师范大学;2007年
4 单梅青;《抱朴子内篇》副词研究[D];山东师范大学;2008年
5 王秀芳;《搜神记》疑问句判断句研究[D];曲阜师范大学;2008年
6 王惠;《潜夫论》《风俗通义》疑问句研究[D];南京师范大学;2008年
7 黄静;《抱朴子》助动词研究[D];山东师范大学;2009年
8 胡晓娜;《抱朴子内篇》介词研究[D];东北师范大学;2009年
9 史慧超;《世说新语》中的疑问句分析[D];北京语言大学;2008年
10 徐雯雯;《论衡》疑问句研究[D];贵州大学;2009年
，本文编号：2341103
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2341103.html
