汉韩社交称谓语对比研究

发布时间：2019-03-04 18:08

【摘要】：社交称谓语是在人们的日常生活中进行交际的重要工具，是不可缺少的部分。目前，关于汉语社交称谓语的研究成果颇丰，然而，从社会语言学角度对汉语社交称谓语的研究成果较少，针对汉韩社交称谓语对比的研究成果更是寥寥无几。本文在前人研究的基础上，，对汉韩社交称谓语进行对比研究，以问卷调查的方式对韩国学习者汉语社交称谓语的使用情况进行考察，得出韩国学习者学习汉语社交称谓语中的难点，进而找出造成偏误的原因。通过分析问卷调查的结果，提出了针对韩国学习者相应的社交称谓语教学策略。本文总共分为四章：第一章：引言。阐述了研究背景和研究意义，简要的概括了汉韩社交称谓语研究概况，指出了研究内容及研究方法，并提出了本文的创新之处。第二章：界定了汉韩社交称谓语的概念和分类，将汉韩社交称谓语分为五类，即姓名称谓语、职业/职衔称谓语、通称称谓语、拟亲属称谓语和零称谓语，并对汉韩社交称谓语进行比较，找出它们之间的异同点。第三章：调查韩国学习者使用汉语社交称谓语的情况，分析其结果，并找出造成韩国学习者使用汉语社交称谓语的偏误的原因。第四章：提出针对韩国学习者汉语社交称谓语的教学策略，包括社交称谓语的教学原则和教学方法。
[Abstract]:Social address is an important tool of communication in people's daily life, and it is an indispensable part. At present, there are quite a lot of achievements in the study of Chinese social address terms. However, the research results on Chinese social address terms from sociolinguistic point of view are few, especially for the comparison of Chinese and Korean social address terms. On the basis of previous studies, this paper makes a comparative study of Chinese and Korean social address terms, and investigates the use of Korean learners' Chinese social address terms by questionnaire. The difficulties in learning Chinese social address terms by Korean learners are obtained, and then the causes of errors are found out. Through the analysis of the results of the questionnaire, this paper puts forward the corresponding social address teaching strategies for Korean learners. This paper is divided into four chapters: chapter one: introduction. This paper expounds the background and significance of the research, briefly summarizes the general situation of Chinese and Korean social address studies, points out the research contents and research methods, and puts forward the innovations of this paper. The second chapter defines the concept and classification of Chinese and Korean social address forms, and divides them into five categories: name appellation, occupation / title appellation, general appellation, quasi-kinship address and zero-appellation, and it can be divided into five categories: name appellation, occupation / title appellation, general appellation, quasi-kinship appellation, and zero-appellation. The author compares the address terms of Han-Korean Society and finds out the similarities and differences between them. The third chapter investigates the use of Chinese social address terms by Korean learners, analyzes the results, and finds out the reasons for the errors in Korean learners' use of Chinese social address terms. The fourth chapter puts forward the teaching strategies of Chinese social address terms for Korean learners, including the teaching principles and teaching methods of social address terms.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H136;H55

【参考文献】