综艺节目《非诚勿扰》中语用失误的顺应—关联视角研究
发布时间：2019-03-31 13:43
【摘要】：钱冠连把语用失误分为语际语用失误和语内语用失误。语用失误是由于听者不能理解说者的话语造成的（Thomas,J,1983:91）。钱冠连（1997:223）从说着的角度提出虽然说者使用了语法正确的句子，但是也无意识地违反了交际准则，社会惯例等方面，，从而造成语用失误。和谐的舞台交际尤其是在高度互动的相亲综艺节目中，更应该注意这种现象.前人研究语用失误主要是从跨文化的角度，文化差异是最凸现的因素。文化不仅仅是造成语用失误的原因。语内语用失误的起因必然也多样。本文的语料来自于语内语境,把语内语用失误研究置于一个特定的具体的场景中是有必要的。综艺节目为语用失误的研究提供了肥沃的土壤。本文发现在交际过程中，不仅是听者，说者也要承担责任。很少有研究者从顺应-关联的语境角度来分析语用失误。本文将在顺应-关联模式下从说话人和听话人的两方面来考虑。 以非诚勿扰为案例分析，本文试图在顺应-关联模式下探讨语用失误的语境成因。本文发现由语言语境引起的语用失误主要是说话者推测听话者的认知能力失败，或两者的话语方式不同造成语境假设有差异。或说话人的话语给听话者的语境假设的形成造成迷惑所造成的。在顺应-关联过程中，听话者会根据自己的推理来补充和扩展信息。在情景语境中，由于听者没有顺应说者的语境假设，忽视说者的真正意图，语用失误随即产生。在背景语境方面，由于听者的个人知识、社会地位、心理的差异导致了语内语用失误。 本文较详细地分析了语用失误的语境成因，并针对性地提出了一些减少语用失误的策略，并试图对语内语用失误的产生机制进行分析，加深人们对造成语用失误语境成因的了解，用顺应-关联论研究综艺节目中的语用失误，扩展了语用失误的研究视角。
[Abstract]:Qian Guanlian divided pragmatic failure into inter-pragmatic failure and intra-pragmatic failure. Pragmatic failure is caused by the listener's inability to understand the speaker's words (Thomas,J,1983:91). Qian Guanlian (1997 / 223) suggested that although the speaker used grammatical correct sentences, he also unconsciously violated the rules of communication, social conventions and so on, which resulted in pragmatic failure. Harmonious stage communication, especially in the highly interactive variety show, should pay more attention to this phenomenon. Previous studies on pragmatic failure are mainly from the perspective of cross-cultural, cultural differences are the most prominent factors. Culture is not only the cause of pragmatic failure. The causes of pragmatic errors must also be varied. The corpus of this paper comes from the context of language, so it is necessary to put the study of pragmatic errors in a specific context. Variety shows provide fertile ground for the study of pragmatic failure. This paper finds that in the process of communication, not only the listener, but also the speaker should bear the responsibility. Few researchers analyze pragmatic failures from the perspective of adaptation-relevance context. This paper will consider both the speaker and the listener in the context of adaptation-relevance model. This paper attempts to explore the contextual causes of pragmatic failure in the context of adaptation-relevance. This paper finds that the pragmatic failure caused by linguistic context is mainly due to the cognitive failure of the speaker to speculate on the listener, or the difference in the discourse style between the two resulting in the difference of contextual assumptions. Or the words of the speaker cause confusion in the formation of the listener's contextual assumptions. In the process of adaptation-relevance, the listener complements and expands the information according to his own reasoning. In situational context, pragmatic failure occurs because the listener does not comply with the speaker's contextual hypothesis and neglects the speaker's true intention. In the context of background, the differences in personal knowledge, social status and psychology of the listener lead to pragmatic errors in the language. This paper makes a detailed analysis of the contextual causes of pragmatic failure, and puts forward some strategies to reduce pragmatic failure, and attempts to analyze the mechanism of pragmatic failure within the language. To deepen people's understanding of the contextual causes of pragmatic failure, the adaptation-relevance theory is used to study pragmatic failure in variety shows, which extends the perspective of pragmatic failure research.
【学位授予单位】：湖南工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：H136
本文编号：2450970
[Abstract]:Qian Guanlian divided pragmatic failure into inter-pragmatic failure and intra-pragmatic failure. Pragmatic failure is caused by the listener's inability to understand the speaker's words (Thomas,J,1983:91). Qian Guanlian (1997 / 223) suggested that although the speaker used grammatical correct sentences, he also unconsciously violated the rules of communication, social conventions and so on, which resulted in pragmatic failure. Harmonious stage communication, especially in the highly interactive variety show, should pay more attention to this phenomenon. Previous studies on pragmatic failure are mainly from the perspective of cross-cultural, cultural differences are the most prominent factors. Culture is not only the cause of pragmatic failure. The causes of pragmatic errors must also be varied. The corpus of this paper comes from the context of language, so it is necessary to put the study of pragmatic errors in a specific context. Variety shows provide fertile ground for the study of pragmatic failure. This paper finds that in the process of communication, not only the listener, but also the speaker should bear the responsibility. Few researchers analyze pragmatic failures from the perspective of adaptation-relevance context. This paper will consider both the speaker and the listener in the context of adaptation-relevance model. This paper attempts to explore the contextual causes of pragmatic failure in the context of adaptation-relevance. This paper finds that the pragmatic failure caused by linguistic context is mainly due to the cognitive failure of the speaker to speculate on the listener, or the difference in the discourse style between the two resulting in the difference of contextual assumptions. Or the words of the speaker cause confusion in the formation of the listener's contextual assumptions. In the process of adaptation-relevance, the listener complements and expands the information according to his own reasoning. In situational context, pragmatic failure occurs because the listener does not comply with the speaker's contextual hypothesis and neglects the speaker's true intention. In the context of background, the differences in personal knowledge, social status and psychology of the listener lead to pragmatic errors in the language. This paper makes a detailed analysis of the contextual causes of pragmatic failure, and puts forward some strategies to reduce pragmatic failure, and attempts to analyze the mechanism of pragmatic failure within the language. To deepen people's understanding of the contextual causes of pragmatic failure, the adaptation-relevance theory is used to study pragmatic failure in variety shows, which extends the perspective of pragmatic failure research.
【学位授予单位】：湖南工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：H136
【参考文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前10条
1 刘绍忠,钟国仕;Thomas语用失误“二分法”质疑[J];广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2003年04期
2 王静;;跨文化交际语用失误原因及对策[J];黑龙江高教研究;2007年09期
3 汪滔;论口译的跨文化语用失误[J];中国科技翻译;2002年01期
4 刘长江;;对托马斯“跨文化语用失误”的诠释与批评[J];外语研究;2008年06期
5 周利娟;从认知角度看交际中的误解[J];外语学刊;2003年03期
6 冉永平;言语交际的顺应—关联性分析[J];外语学刊;2004年02期
7 曹春春;礼貌准则与语用失误——英汉语用失误现象比较研究[J];外语学刊(黑龙江大学学报);1998年02期
8 旷战;唐德根;;关联理论与跨文化交际会话含义的理解[J];齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年01期
9 陈春华;顺应论和关联论——两种语用观的比较[J];四川外语学院学报;2003年02期
10 韩彩英;情景会话中的语境及其语义制约功能[J];山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1998年03期
本文编号：2450970
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2450970.html
