《管子》尹知章注训诂研究

发布时间：2019-04-03 13:07

【摘要】：尹知章注是现存最早的《管子》注本。尽管后世学者对《管子》尹知章注多有诟病,对其训诂内容做了大量匡谬补苴工作,却忽视了其历史地位与价值。尹注简洁的训释风格、丰富的训诂内容,不仅为后人研究《管子》提供了宝贵资源,而且便于人们全面了解唐代的训诂风貌。目前,学术界对《管子》的研究,主要集中于思想内容方面,自清代训诂学繁盛以来,王念孙、洪颐煊、戴望等训诂大家专注于对该书的重新注释,对尹注的训诂成就却鲜有提及。本文以《管子》尹知章注为研究对象,对尹注进行全面系统的研究。一方面正视其训释的风格与特点,另一方面揭示其存在的不足与失误。本文分为七个部分。第一章为引论,简述《管子》尹知章注的研究意义与价值、研究历史与现状,概述尹知章生平及其所注《管子》,并介绍本文将采取的研究方法。第二章论述尹知章注的训诂内容,含赅解释字词、申明句义、疏解篇章、阐明语法现象、揭示修辞现象兼具考证名物、典制等方面。第三章阐述尹知章注的训诂方法。尹注所用训诂方法主要包括因声求义、以形索义、因文求义三个方面。第四章分别从释义、注音和校勘三个方面梳理尹注的训诂术语。第五章分论述尹注的训诂特点。从“语言简练质朴,释义要括不繁”、“参考前人训诂成果,训释于古有据”、“释义明确,实事求是”、“释义灵活,不拘一义”、“训诂方式多样”五个方面展开论述。第六章分论述尹注失误的类型。尹注失误主要原因在于不明句议、不审语境、望文生训、拆词为训、不明古义、不明文例、原文错讹、不辨通假等八个方面。第七章考释尹注中存有争议、尚未有定论的词语,他们分别是“云”、“方”、“倮”、“搏(博)”、“椪”。
[Abstract]:Yin Zhizhang note is the earliest extant "tube" annotated edition. Although later scholars have criticized Yin Zhizhang for making a lot of corrections to his exegetical contents, they have ignored their historical status and value. Yin's concise exegetical style and rich exegetical content not only provide valuable resources for future generations to study Guanzi, but also facilitate people to understand the exegetical features of Tang Dynasty in an all-round way. At present, the academic research on "Guan" mainly focuses on the ideological content. Since the flourishing exegesis of the Qing Dynasty, Wang Niansun, Hong Yixuan, Dai Wang and other exegetical scholars have focused on the re-annotation of the book. Yin's exegetical achievements are rarely mentioned. This paper takes Yin Zhizhang as the research object, and makes a comprehensive and systematic study on Yin Zhizhang. On the one hand, facing up to the style and characteristics of its interpretation, on the other hand, it reveals its shortcomings and mistakes. This paper is divided into seven parts. The first chapter is an introduction, which briefly introduces the significance and value of Yin Zhizhang's notes, studies history and present situation, summarizes Yin Zhizhang's life and his notes, and introduces the research methods to be adopted in this paper. The second chapter discusses the exegetical contents of Yin Zhizhang's notes, including explaining the words, affirming the meaning of the sentence, clarifying the text, clarifying the grammatical phenomenon, revealing the rhetoric phenomenon with both textual research and classical system. The third chapter expounds the exegetical methods of Yin Zhizhang's notes. Yin's exegetical method mainly includes three aspects: seeking meaning by sound, seeking meaning by form and seeking justice by writing. The fourth chapter combs Yin's exegetical terms from three aspects: interpretation, phonetic annotation and collation. The fifth chapter discusses the exegetical characteristics of Yin's notes. It is discussed from five aspects: "simplicity and simplicity of language, no complicated interpretation", "reference to previous exegetical results, explanation in ancient times", "clear interpretation, seeking truth from facts", "flexible interpretation, no restriction on one meaning" and "variety of exegetical methods". The sixth chapter discusses the types of Yin's mistakes. The main reasons for Yin's blunders lie in eight aspects: unknown sentence discussion, non-trial context, looking forward to the text of the training, disassembly of words for training, unknown ancient meaning, unknown examples of literature, the original error, do not distinguish between false and false, and so on. The seventh chapter explains the controversial and inconclusive words in Yin's notes. They are "Yun", "Fang", "Le", "Bo (Bo)" and "Gengcheng", which are respectively "Yun", "Fang", "Hu", "Bo" and "Gengcheng".
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H13

【参考文献】