中国古代法庭中空间权力的多模态话语分析
发布时间：2021-04-15 19:50
规训权力通过层级监视等手段来约束并驯顺人的行为和思想,而空间是权力运作的重要载体。作为司法审判的实践场域,法庭是一种规训性机构,权力关系（包括规训权力）也体现在其空间结构话语中。当前的法庭话语研究揭示了以法官为中心的权力不平等在庭审言语交际诸多层面的体现,而对于庭审语境中法官权力的制约因素尚缺乏深入的考察。本文拟从法庭的空间话语角度探讨中国古代法庭中规训权力的空间结构配置及其对法官话语权力的制约。结合福柯的“权力空间”学说,本文以系统功能符号学理论框架为分析工具,对河南内乡县衙法庭中空间化的权力进行深入的多模态话语分析。通过对法庭空间文本的元功能解读,本文揭示了古代法庭中多模态符号体现的道德教化:视觉图像（如屏风彩绘）和文字文本（如楹联文字）两种模态相互阐释,凸显了中国传统司法价值追求,在潜移默化中规训着法官的思想意识形态与审判行为。空间构成上,古代法庭可被视为福柯式的全景敞式监狱:相互延伸的空间文本在功能上担当了权力的眼睛,时刻监视、规训着法官的司法行为,并促使法官在这种凝视性目光中加强自我约束。此外,本文对一则模拟古代法庭审判的视频文本进行话语分析,一定程度上佐证了此规训权力的确能...
【文章来源】：南京理工大学江苏省 211工程院校
【文章页数】：85 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Research Background
1.2 Research Significance
1.3 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 A Systemic Functional Semiotic Approach to Multimodal Discourse Analysis
2.1.1 Multimodal discourse analysis
2.1.2 Multimodal discourse analysis and Systemic Functional Linguistics
2.1.3 Previous studies on MDA abroad
2.1.4 Previous studies on MDA at home
2.2 Previous Studies on Courtroom Power
2.2.1 Studies on courtroom power abroad
2.2.2 Studies on courtroom power at home
2.3 Previous Studies on Traditional Chinese Courtroom
2.3.1 Historical development and architecture evolution
2.3.2 Architectural arts and cultural connotations
2.3.3 Architectural features and power operation
2.4 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
3.1 Foucauldian Power-space Theory
3.1.1 Power and space
3.1.2 Disciplinary power
3.2 Metafunctions in Halliday's Systemic Functional Linguistics
3.2.1 Ideational metafunction
3.2.2 Interpersonal metafunction
3.2.3 Textual metafunction
3.3 Kress & Van Leeuwen's Visual Grammar
3.3.1 Representational meaning
3.3.2 Interactive meaning
3.3.3 Compositional meaning
Chapter Four Research Methodology
4.1 Research Questions
4.2 Research Data
4.3 Data Transcription
4.4 Research Procedure
Chapter Five A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Spatialized Power onJudges in the Courtrooms of Neixiang Yamen
5.1 Written Representation of Disciplinary Power on Judges in Plaques and Couplets
5.1.1 Plaques and couplets in and around the principal hall
5.1.2 Plaques and couplets in and around the secondary hall
5.1.3 Plaques and couplets in and around the tertiary hall
5.2 Pictorial Representation of Disciplinary Power on Judges in Paintings and ReliefSculptures
5.2.1 Paintings in the principal hall
5.2.2 Paintings in the secondary hall
5.2.3 Relief sculptures at other sites
5.3 Multi-dimensional Spatial Representation of Disciplinary Power on Judges inCourtroom
5.3.1 A panoptic power-restricting network in the principal hall
5.3.2 A panoptic power-restricting network in the secondary hall
5.3.3 A panoptic power-restricting network in the tertiary hall
5.4 Spatialized Power in Action:Dramatized Courtroom Behaviors of the Judge in theIllustrative Video
Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Major Findings of the Present Study
6.2 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Studies
Acknowledgements
References
Appendix Ⅰ
Appendix Ⅱ
Appendix Ⅲ
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]法庭话语权力的空间配置与法官话语的非中心化——对内乡县衙大堂法庭空间的多模态话语分析[J]. 张丽萍,丁天会. 语言学研究. 2017(02)
[2]我国法院建筑的法文化分析[J]. 赵明胜. 西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2015(06)
[3]法庭话语打断现象与性别研究[J]. 廖美珍,龚进军. 当代修辞学. 2015(01)
[4]“规训”的司法与“被缚”的法官——对法官绩效考核制度困境与误区的深层解读[J]. 李拥军,傅爱竹. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报). 2014(06)
[5]社会符号学视角下广告语篇的多模态话语分析[J]. 张蔚. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版). 2012(02)
[6]刑事审判法庭布置的法理分析[J]. 胡夏冰,陈春梅. 辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2011(06)
[7]动态多模态话语的模态协同研究——以电视天气预报多模态语篇为例[J]. 张德禄,袁艳艳. 山东外语教学. 2011(05)
[8]情理法的正当性:以“情”为核心的阐释———以《名公书判清明集》为考察依据[J]. 崔明石. 吉林师范大学学报(人文社会科学版). 2011(02)
[9]琶洲展馆的多模态话语分析——造型与功能的结合[J]. 李妙晴. 外语艺术教育研究. 2010(03)
[10]凡俗与神圣:解读“明镜高悬”的司法意义[J]. 徐忠明. 中国法学. 2010(02)
博士论文
[1]庭审话语中的法官身份构建[D]. 江玲.上海外国语大学 2012
[2]法庭审判话语的批评性分析[D]. 施光.南京师范大学 2008
硕士论文
[1]中国法庭审判的非言语传播及其符号阐释[D]. 葛恒.陕西师范大学 2016
[2]电影语篇《喜羊羊与灰太狼》的多模态话语分析[D]. 郭思斯.南京师范大学 2012
[3]中国文化的符号与象征的研究[D]. 高雪.山东大学 2010
[4]内乡县衙建筑研究[D]. 栗晓文.河南大学 2009
[5]明清时期衙署建筑制度研究[D]. 牛淑杰.西安建筑科技大学 2003
本文编号：3139985
【文章来源】：南京理工大学江苏省 211工程院校
【文章页数】：85 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Research Background
1.2 Research Significance
1.3 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 A Systemic Functional Semiotic Approach to Multimodal Discourse Analysis
2.1.1 Multimodal discourse analysis
2.1.2 Multimodal discourse analysis and Systemic Functional Linguistics
2.1.3 Previous studies on MDA abroad
2.1.4 Previous studies on MDA at home
2.2 Previous Studies on Courtroom Power
2.2.1 Studies on courtroom power abroad
2.2.2 Studies on courtroom power at home
2.3 Previous Studies on Traditional Chinese Courtroom
2.3.1 Historical development and architecture evolution
2.3.2 Architectural arts and cultural connotations
2.3.3 Architectural features and power operation
2.4 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
3.1 Foucauldian Power-space Theory
3.1.1 Power and space
3.1.2 Disciplinary power
3.2 Metafunctions in Halliday's Systemic Functional Linguistics
3.2.1 Ideational metafunction
3.2.2 Interpersonal metafunction
3.2.3 Textual metafunction
3.3 Kress & Van Leeuwen's Visual Grammar
3.3.1 Representational meaning
3.3.2 Interactive meaning
3.3.3 Compositional meaning
Chapter Four Research Methodology
4.1 Research Questions
4.2 Research Data
4.3 Data Transcription
4.4 Research Procedure
Chapter Five A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Spatialized Power onJudges in the Courtrooms of Neixiang Yamen
5.1 Written Representation of Disciplinary Power on Judges in Plaques and Couplets
5.1.1 Plaques and couplets in and around the principal hall
5.1.2 Plaques and couplets in and around the secondary hall
5.1.3 Plaques and couplets in and around the tertiary hall
5.2 Pictorial Representation of Disciplinary Power on Judges in Paintings and ReliefSculptures
5.2.1 Paintings in the principal hall
5.2.2 Paintings in the secondary hall
5.2.3 Relief sculptures at other sites
5.3 Multi-dimensional Spatial Representation of Disciplinary Power on Judges inCourtroom
5.3.1 A panoptic power-restricting network in the principal hall
5.3.2 A panoptic power-restricting network in the secondary hall
5.3.3 A panoptic power-restricting network in the tertiary hall
5.4 Spatialized Power in Action:Dramatized Courtroom Behaviors of the Judge in theIllustrative Video
Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Major Findings of the Present Study
6.2 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Studies
Acknowledgements
References
Appendix Ⅰ
Appendix Ⅱ
Appendix Ⅲ
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]法庭话语权力的空间配置与法官话语的非中心化——对内乡县衙大堂法庭空间的多模态话语分析[J]. 张丽萍,丁天会. 语言学研究. 2017(02)
[2]我国法院建筑的法文化分析[J]. 赵明胜. 西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2015(06)
[3]法庭话语打断现象与性别研究[J]. 廖美珍,龚进军. 当代修辞学. 2015(01)
[4]“规训”的司法与“被缚”的法官——对法官绩效考核制度困境与误区的深层解读[J]. 李拥军,傅爱竹. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报). 2014(06)
[5]社会符号学视角下广告语篇的多模态话语分析[J]. 张蔚. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版). 2012(02)
[6]刑事审判法庭布置的法理分析[J]. 胡夏冰,陈春梅. 辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2011(06)
[7]动态多模态话语的模态协同研究——以电视天气预报多模态语篇为例[J]. 张德禄,袁艳艳. 山东外语教学. 2011(05)
[8]情理法的正当性:以“情”为核心的阐释———以《名公书判清明集》为考察依据[J]. 崔明石. 吉林师范大学学报(人文社会科学版). 2011(02)
[9]琶洲展馆的多模态话语分析——造型与功能的结合[J]. 李妙晴. 外语艺术教育研究. 2010(03)
[10]凡俗与神圣:解读“明镜高悬”的司法意义[J]. 徐忠明. 中国法学. 2010(02)
博士论文
[1]庭审话语中的法官身份构建[D]. 江玲.上海外国语大学 2012
[2]法庭审判话语的批评性分析[D]. 施光.南京师范大学 2008
硕士论文
[1]中国法庭审判的非言语传播及其符号阐释[D]. 葛恒.陕西师范大学 2016
[2]电影语篇《喜羊羊与灰太狼》的多模态话语分析[D]. 郭思斯.南京师范大学 2012
[3]中国文化的符号与象征的研究[D]. 高雪.山东大学 2010
[4]内乡县衙建筑研究[D]. 栗晓文.河南大学 2009
[5]明清时期衙署建筑制度研究[D]. 牛淑杰.西安建筑科技大学 2003
本文编号：3139985
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/3139985.html
