汉语词典中反义复合词词类标注实证研究
发布时间：2021-06-15 06:59
范畴化是语言学的核心问题,词类范畴化问题更是一个老大难问题。在2014年德国语言学会第36届年会上,词类等语言范畴的研究被誉为语言中的“上帝粒子”研究,而汉语等分析语的词类研究更是“哥德巴赫猜想”式难题。在汉语词类研究中,概括词的语法多功能现象饱受争议。反义复合词作为汉语特有的构词现象,一直以来备受学界关注,而多数研究均是围绕其认知机制、教学与习得等方面进行的,少有对词典中反义复合词的词类标注进行大数据实证研究。本文以两部权威的汉语词典（《现代汉语词典》（第7版）（以下简称《现汉》）和《现代汉语规范词典》（第三版）（《现汉规范》））共有的264个反义复合词为研究对象,以双层词类范畴化理论作为支撑,通过国家语委现代汉语语料库和北京大学中国语言学研究中心现代汉语语料库中反义复合词的使用模式调查,进而对其词类归属进行判断。研究发现,《现汉》和《现汉规范》在反义复合词的词类标注中存在人为减少兼类的倾向。在共有的264个反义复合词中,《现汉》和《现汉规范》中分别有62个和81个反义复合词的词类标注存在问题,错误率分别为23.48%和30.68%,其中词类漏标问题突出。基于语料库调查显示出的反义复...
【文章来源】：四川外国语大学重庆市
【文章页数】：93 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Rationale of the Study
1.2 Objectives of the Study
1.3 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Previous Studies on Word Classes
2.1.1 Previous Studies on Origin and Criteria of Word Classes
2.1.2 Previous Studies on Multifunctionality
2.2 Previous Studies on Word Class Labeling in Chinese Dictionaries
2.3 Previous Studies on Antonymous Compounds
2.3.1 Definition of Antonymous Compounds in Chinese
2.3.2 Recognition of Opposite Sense Relationships
2.3.3 Relevant Researches on Antonymous Compounds
2.4 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Foundation
3.1 Theoretical Background of the Two-Level Word Class Categorization Theory
3.1.1 Language as a Complex Adaptive System
3.1.2 The Usage-Based Theory
3.1.3 Theory of Norms and Exploitations
3.2 Main Tenets of the Two-level Word Class Categorization Theory
3.3 Summary
Chapter Four Research Design
4.1 The Selection of Dictionaries and Corpora
4.2 Data Collection
4.3 Data Processing
Chapter Five Results and Discussion
5.1 Results
5.1.1 The Survey of the Shared Antonymous Compounds in CCD7 and in MCSD
5.1.2 The Survey of the Shared Antonymous Compounds Based on Corpora
5.1.3 Comparative Survey of the Shared Antonymous Compounds Among CCD7, MCSD3 and Corpus-based Results
5.1.4 The Survey of Multi-category Lexemes and Their Frequency Ranks
5.2 Discussion
5.2.1 Discussion on the Word Class Labeling of Antonymous Compounds
5.2.2 Causes of Improper Word Class Labeling
5.2.2.1 The Infeasibility of the “Principle of Parsimony”
5.2.2.2 The Misuse of Logic
5.2.3 The Basis of Word Class Labeling: Corpus-Based Usage Pattern Surveys with a Case Study
5.3 Summary
Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Major Findings
6.2 Limitations of the Study
6.3 Suggestions for the Further Study
References
Appendices
Appendix 1 Comparison of Word Class Labeling of 264 Antonymous Compounds Among CCD7, MCSD3 and Corpus-based Results
Appendix 2 Comparison of Word Class Labeling of Antonymous Compounds with Improper Word Class Labeling Among CCD7, MCSD3 and Corpus-based Results..
Appendix 3 The Frequency Ranks of 264 Shared Antonymous Compounds and Their Word Classes Based on Corpora
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]“出版”的词类问题与向心结构之争——一项基于双层词类范畴化理论的研究[J]. 王仁强,杨旭. 汉语学报. 2017(04)
[2]从双层词类范畴化理论看现代汉语自指词项的兼类问题[J]. 王仁强,黄昌宁. 外国语文. 2017(01)
[3]基于HSK动态作文语料库的反义复合词教学研究[J]. 刘牧虹. 清远职业技术学院学报. 2016(05)
[4]《牛津高阶英语词典》（第8版）动名兼类词条表征策略研究[J]. 王仁强,王端. 外国语文. 2016(02)
[5]兼类说反思[J]. 周韧. 语言科学. 2015(05)
[6]现代汉语兼类与词频的相关性研究——兼评“简略原则”的效度[J]. 王仁强,周瑜. 外国语文. 2015(02)
[7]词类的类型学和汉语的词类[J]. 沈家煊. 当代语言学. 2015(02)
[8]现代英语兼类现状研究——以《牛津高阶英语词典》（第7版）为例[J]. 王仁强. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2014(04)
[9]从汉语反义复合词构词看汉语教学本位观[J]. 张未然. 现代语文(语言研究版). 2014(01)
[10]基于语料库的动词与构式关系研究——以sneeze及物动词用法的规约化为例[J]. 王仁强,陈和敏. 外语教学与研究. 2014(01)
博士论文
[1]反义复合词形成演变的认知研究[D]. 曾丹.浙江大学 2007
硕士论文
[1]《现代汉语词典》（第6版）兼类词表征策略研究[D]. 杨旭.四川外国语大学 2017
[2]汉英词典中反义复合词的词类标注实证研究[D]. 吴雪静.四川外国语大学 2015
[3]汉语反义复合词的MP模型分析[D]. 王兴社.四川外国语大学 2014
[4]论现代汉语反义复合词及其教学[D]. 王敏兰.辽宁师范大学 2013
[5]反义复合词词汇化过程中的语义发展[D]. 金硕.河北师范大学 2007
[6]反义语素合成词研究[D]. 王冠.东北师范大学 2006
[7]汉语反义语素合成词及其习得研究[D]. 廖暑业.暨南大学 2006
[8]反义相成词探究[D]. 郭奕晶.山东师范大学 2000
本文编号：3230680
【文章来源】：四川外国语大学重庆市
【文章页数】：93 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Rationale of the Study
1.2 Objectives of the Study
1.3 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Previous Studies on Word Classes
2.1.1 Previous Studies on Origin and Criteria of Word Classes
2.1.2 Previous Studies on Multifunctionality
2.2 Previous Studies on Word Class Labeling in Chinese Dictionaries
2.3 Previous Studies on Antonymous Compounds
2.3.1 Definition of Antonymous Compounds in Chinese
2.3.2 Recognition of Opposite Sense Relationships
2.3.3 Relevant Researches on Antonymous Compounds
2.4 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Foundation
3.1 Theoretical Background of the Two-Level Word Class Categorization Theory
3.1.1 Language as a Complex Adaptive System
3.1.2 The Usage-Based Theory
3.1.3 Theory of Norms and Exploitations
3.2 Main Tenets of the Two-level Word Class Categorization Theory
3.3 Summary
Chapter Four Research Design
4.1 The Selection of Dictionaries and Corpora
4.2 Data Collection
4.3 Data Processing
Chapter Five Results and Discussion
5.1 Results
5.1.1 The Survey of the Shared Antonymous Compounds in CCD7 and in MCSD
5.1.2 The Survey of the Shared Antonymous Compounds Based on Corpora
5.1.3 Comparative Survey of the Shared Antonymous Compounds Among CCD7, MCSD3 and Corpus-based Results
5.1.4 The Survey of Multi-category Lexemes and Their Frequency Ranks
5.2 Discussion
5.2.1 Discussion on the Word Class Labeling of Antonymous Compounds
5.2.2 Causes of Improper Word Class Labeling
5.2.2.1 The Infeasibility of the “Principle of Parsimony”
5.2.2.2 The Misuse of Logic
5.2.3 The Basis of Word Class Labeling: Corpus-Based Usage Pattern Surveys with a Case Study
5.3 Summary
Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Major Findings
6.2 Limitations of the Study
6.3 Suggestions for the Further Study
References
Appendices
Appendix 1 Comparison of Word Class Labeling of 264 Antonymous Compounds Among CCD7, MCSD3 and Corpus-based Results
Appendix 2 Comparison of Word Class Labeling of Antonymous Compounds with Improper Word Class Labeling Among CCD7, MCSD3 and Corpus-based Results..
Appendix 3 The Frequency Ranks of 264 Shared Antonymous Compounds and Their Word Classes Based on Corpora
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]“出版”的词类问题与向心结构之争——一项基于双层词类范畴化理论的研究[J]. 王仁强,杨旭. 汉语学报. 2017(04)
[2]从双层词类范畴化理论看现代汉语自指词项的兼类问题[J]. 王仁强,黄昌宁. 外国语文. 2017(01)
[3]基于HSK动态作文语料库的反义复合词教学研究[J]. 刘牧虹. 清远职业技术学院学报. 2016(05)
[4]《牛津高阶英语词典》（第8版）动名兼类词条表征策略研究[J]. 王仁强,王端. 外国语文. 2016(02)
[5]兼类说反思[J]. 周韧. 语言科学. 2015(05)
[6]现代汉语兼类与词频的相关性研究——兼评“简略原则”的效度[J]. 王仁强,周瑜. 外国语文. 2015(02)
[7]词类的类型学和汉语的词类[J]. 沈家煊. 当代语言学. 2015(02)
[8]现代英语兼类现状研究——以《牛津高阶英语词典》（第7版）为例[J]. 王仁强. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2014(04)
[9]从汉语反义复合词构词看汉语教学本位观[J]. 张未然. 现代语文(语言研究版). 2014(01)
[10]基于语料库的动词与构式关系研究——以sneeze及物动词用法的规约化为例[J]. 王仁强,陈和敏. 外语教学与研究. 2014(01)
博士论文
[1]反义复合词形成演变的认知研究[D]. 曾丹.浙江大学 2007
硕士论文
[1]《现代汉语词典》（第6版）兼类词表征策略研究[D]. 杨旭.四川外国语大学 2017
[2]汉英词典中反义复合词的词类标注实证研究[D]. 吴雪静.四川外国语大学 2015
[3]汉语反义复合词的MP模型分析[D]. 王兴社.四川外国语大学 2014
[4]论现代汉语反义复合词及其教学[D]. 王敏兰.辽宁师范大学 2013
[5]反义复合词词汇化过程中的语义发展[D]. 金硕.河北师范大学 2007
[6]反义语素合成词研究[D]. 王冠.东北师范大学 2006
[7]汉语反义语素合成词及其习得研究[D]. 廖暑业.暨南大学 2006
[8]反义相成词探究[D]. 郭奕晶.山东师范大学 2000
本文编号：3230680
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/3230680.html
