沈钦韩误责魏泰略议——《王荆公诗文沈氏注》指瑕一则

发布时间：2018-01-07 13:19

本文关键词：沈钦韩误责魏泰略议——《王荆公诗文沈氏注》指瑕一则　出处：《中国典籍与文化》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正清代嘉庆著名学者沈钦韩学问淹博,识见深广,所作大著《王荆公诗文沈氏注》,广引群书,旁采众说,是研读王安石诗文的极佳注本。然而其中也间或评说不当,偶有疏误。后学之人于此自当不需为其避讳,而应正本清源,以作补苴之说。其疏误之一,是在注释王诗《和王微之登高斋》时,说李壁注王微之为王皙为错,应该是王贽(《王荆公诗文沈氏注》,中华书局香港分局,1977年9月,页24)。对沈钦韩的这一个疏误,近年已有李之亮先生加以精彩辨说:此王微之实是王
[Abstract]:Is a famous scholar Shen Qin Han Jiaqing of the Qing Dynasty a profound knowledge, experience, the great king 's poetry note > < Shen, widely cited books, there is next to the mining, the study of Wang Anshi's excellent. But it is also inappropriate comments or, occasionally errors. People in this school since when does not need to taboo, and we must, to make up for the said. One of the errors, in notes Wang poem "and Wang Weizhi climb Zhai >, said Li Bizhu Wang Weizhi Wang Xi is wrong, it should be Wang Zhi (< note > poems of Wang Anshi Shen, Zhonghua Book Company Hongkong branch, September 1977, page 24). This is a mistake Shen Qinhan, in recent years, Mr. Li Zhiliang said: this wonderful resolution to Wang Weizhi is king

【作者单位】：上海市黄浦教育学院;
【正文快照】： 清代嘉庆著名学者沈钦韩学问淹博,识见深广,所作大著《王荆公诗文沈氏注》,广引群书,旁采众说,是研读王安石诗文的极佳注本。然而其中也间或评说不当,偶有疏误。后学之人于此自当不需为其避讳,而应正本清源,以作补苴之说。其疏误之一,是在注释王诗《和王微之登高斋》时,说李

【相似文献】