当代文学史写作的困境与出路

发布时间：2018-03-21 20:03

本文选题：当代文学史　切入点：写作　出处：《内蒙古社会科学(汉文版)》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：当代文学发展至今,其历史书写一直争论不断,从当代文学能否写史、当代文学分期的上下限问题,到对已有当代文学史的疑虑和不满乃至要求重写、"地下文学""文革文学"等敏感话题及港、澳、台文学在中国当代文学史中的定位等,都是当代文学史写作过程中必须慎重对待的问题。此外,"人修史"的不同程度的偏颇和当代文学不断发展演变的动态性又加深了当代文学史写作的难度。而与文学发展关系甚密的出版媒介视角的发掘,以文学出版体制的转轨作为文学发展分期的参照,一定程度上确保了文学研究的客观性和可靠性,也可以这样说,一部当代文学出版史也是一部当代文学发展史。
[Abstract]:Since the development of contemporary literature, its historical writing has been debated continuously. From whether contemporary literature can write history and whether contemporary literature can be divided into stages, To such sensitive topics as "underground literature" and "literature of the Cultural Revolution" and the positioning of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan literature in the history of contemporary Chinese literature, such as doubts and dissatisfaction with and even demands for rewriting of the existing history of contemporary literature, "Underground Literature", "Literature of the Cultural Revolution," and so on. In addition, the different degree of bias of "the history of man" and the dynamic nature of the development and evolution of contemporary literature make it more difficult to write the history of contemporary literature. The exploration of the perspective of publishing media, which is closely related to the development of learning, Taking the transition of the literary publishing system as the reference for the stage of literary development ensures the objectivity and reliability of literary research to a certain extent. It can also be said that a history of contemporary literary publishing is also a history of contemporary literature development.
【作者单位】：山东大学文艺美学研究中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“媒介与百年中国文学互动共生关系研究”(编号:13AZW002)
【分类号】：I206.7

【相似文献】