接收者的“二次叙述化”与“诗”学阐释的本质——以“刺诗”“淫诗”之争为中心
发布时间：2019-04-04 18:33
【摘要】：从接收者"二次叙述化"的视角看,"刺诗"与"淫诗"的界定其实是不同时期的解释社群在面临《诗经》文本时,采取不同的"二次叙述化"方式导致的结果。"刺诗"与"淫诗"之争的本质也是不同时期的解释社群在接受《诗经》时的"二次叙述化"方式之争。解释社群不同,"二次叙述化"的方式就不同,对"诗"旨的阐释也就不同。
[Abstract]:From the point of view of the receiver's "second narrative", the definition of "thorny poem" and "pornographic poem" is actually the result of different ways of "second narrating" taken by the interpretive community in different periods when faced with the text of the Book of songs. " The essence of the dispute between the poem of sting and the poem of obscenity is also the dispute of the way of "the second narrative" in the acceptance of the Book of songs by the interpretive community in different periods. Different interpretation of community, the way of the second narrative is different, and the interpretation of the purpose of the poem is different.
【作者单位】： 上海大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“中国诗歌叙事传统研究”(152DB067)
【分类号】：I207.22
本文编号：2454059
[Abstract]:From the point of view of the receiver's "second narrative", the definition of "thorny poem" and "pornographic poem" is actually the result of different ways of "second narrating" taken by the interpretive community in different periods when faced with the text of the Book of songs. " The essence of the dispute between the poem of sting and the poem of obscenity is also the dispute of the way of "the second narrative" in the acceptance of the Book of songs by the interpretive community in different periods. Different interpretation of community, the way of the second narrative is different, and the interpretation of the purpose of the poem is different.
【作者单位】： 上海大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“中国诗歌叙事传统研究”(152DB067)
【分类号】：I207.22
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 赵毅衡;;论二次叙述[J];福建论坛(人文社会科学版);2014年01期
2 薛海燕;王大鹏;;次叙述层中的小故事在《红楼梦》中的功能[J];红楼梦学刊;2006年05期
3 马立军;;从世次叙述看北朝姓族制度对墓志写作的影响[J];文艺评论;2012年08期
，本文编号：2454059
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/2454059.html
