抽象与具象绘画形式语言的关系分析
[Abstract]:Painting, as an art form which is accompanied by human reproduction, has a heavy history in the development of painting. In the process of painting development, it has formed various schools such as figurative image painting school and abstract painting school, and so on, in the course of the development of painting, there are many schools, such as figurative painting school, abstract painting school and so on. Its development presents us with a rich and colorful art world. In the process of development, the controversy between the figurative painting school and the abstract painting school is in the process of incessant escalation. This paper concretely analyzes the connotation and characteristics of abstract painting and concrete painting, and on this basis further analyzes the relationship between them. There is a deep relationship between abstract art and figurative art. To a certain extent, the development of concrete painting will have the sublimation and transformation of time, space, form, content, technique, etc. This is a long and complex process of evolution. Painting form language is the continuous generation of continuous evolution of innovation and development process. Then there appears a highly logical, abstract and rigorous abstract art form after sublimation. In the process of this change and development, the art of painting form language is constantly changing and developing. In the postgraduate stage, the author constantly explores and discusses the past, present and future development of abstract painting form language, and the change and development of abstract painting language in art aesthetics will be an innovative development stage. The significance of the study is that combining the artistic language of many outstanding artistic masters with the creative experience and experience of the author's self-exploration and research can promote the development of the formal language of painting on the basis of practice and theory. Can have a new chapter in the category of artistic aesthetics.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:J205
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李晓华;;也谈抽象与具象绘画[J];美与时代;2006年02期
2 董金龙;;浅析法国当代具象绘画[J];美术大观;2009年07期
3 陈洪健;;新具象绘画及其精神性探索[J];大众文艺;2010年02期
4 李友昌;;从两幅画的比较看当代新具象绘画的特点[J];美术大观;2010年09期
5 王海明;熊伟;;西方近现代新具象绘画之我见[J];美术大观;2010年08期
6 胡继宁;;浅析现当代具象绘画的表现性[J];美与时代(中);2010年12期
7 孙齐;;浅谈情感在具象绘画、雕塑中的意义[J];美术大观;2011年11期
8 程建;;浅谈具象绘画中的抽象因素[J];大众文艺;2011年20期
9 黄海蓉;;具象绘画的存在与生机[J];大众文艺;2012年09期
10 ;美国当代具象绘画[J];世界美术;1993年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前5条
1 孙金韬;别具意味的新具象绘画[N];中国文化报;2009年
2 记者 李彬 唐真龙;守望与求索[N];上海证券报;2010年
3 戴士和;具象绘画的勃勃生机[N];中国文化报;2006年
4 陈正雄;抽象画欣赏的美学原则[N];中国艺术报;2009年
5 殷双喜;人文精神的价值[N];文艺报;2004年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 徐晨阳;“意”与“物”[D];中国艺术研究院;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 蒋伟华;西方具象绘画中环境因素对情感传达的研究[D];中央美术学院;2010年
2 陈洪健;新具象绘画的精神性呈现[D];山东建筑大学;2010年
3 冯超;论具象绘画的抽象性[D];湖北美术学院;2007年
4 吴洪兵;真性情的表现现实生活-浅析阿利卡具象绘画艺术[D];山东建筑大学;2015年
5 吴尚;心理的现实主义[D];天津美术学院;2015年
6 丁椺宁;浅析具象绘画中运动性特征[D];上海大学;2015年
7 李晴艳;论具象绘画用笔的形式感[D];上海大学;2015年
8 宋李强;抽象与具象绘画形式语言的关系分析[D];南昌大学;2015年
9 龚为;现当代具象绘画的构图[D];湖南师范大学;2009年
10 武鸿飞;具象绘画的新生[D];河南大学;2011年
,本文编号:2239966
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/huihuayishu/2239966.html