语图视域中的差异思想——福柯和利奥塔的对话
发布时间：2018-09-19 20:41
【摘要】：在语图(语言和绘画)视域中,福柯和利奥塔共同致力于将差异思想融入对语言和绘画之间关系的思考,并借助来自绘画的启示探究语言的局限性和可能性。他们从后结构主义立场出发,格外关注符号的物质性(不透明性)以及看和说之间的异质性。福柯为揭示符号的物质性提出"实物—画"概念,并将看和说形成的复调性空间称为"非场所"。利奥塔鉴于结构主义语言学的封闭性和僵化性对符号物质性造成剥夺,指出"图形"对以结构主义为代表的"话语"具有解构作用,并把图形(看)和话语(说)形成的"非场所"称为"间世界"。他们二人就语图问题展开的潜在对话是在(后)结构主义和现象学之争以及意识哲学(主体哲学)的式微等思想文化背景中进行的,所涉及到的对意识/无意识、主体/他者、理性/身体等问题的思考至今仍有启示意义。
[Abstract]:In the perspective of language picture (language and painting) Foucault and Liotta work together to integrate the thought of difference into the consideration of the relationship between language and painting and explore the limitations and possibilities of language with the help of inspiration from painting. They pay special attention to the materiality (opacity) of symbols and the heterogeneity between seeing and saying from the post-structuralism standpoint. Foucault put forward the concept of "material-painting" in order to reveal the materiality of symbols, and called the polyphonic space formed by seeing and saying as "non-place". In view of the fact that the closeness and inflexibility of structuralist linguistics deprive the symbolic materiality, Liotta points out that "figure" has a deconstruction effect on the "discourse" represented by structuralism. And the figure (see) and discourse (say) formed by the "non-place" called "the world." The potential dialogue between the two of them on the problem of linguistic graph is carried out in the ideological and cultural background of (post) structuralism and phenomenology, as well as the decline of the philosophy of consciousness (philosophy of subject), which involves consciousness / unconsciousness, subject / other, etc. Rational / physical thinking is still instructive.
【作者单位】： 南京大学文学院;
【分类号】：J205
本文编号：2251280
[Abstract]:In the perspective of language picture (language and painting) Foucault and Liotta work together to integrate the thought of difference into the consideration of the relationship between language and painting and explore the limitations and possibilities of language with the help of inspiration from painting. They pay special attention to the materiality (opacity) of symbols and the heterogeneity between seeing and saying from the post-structuralism standpoint. Foucault put forward the concept of "material-painting" in order to reveal the materiality of symbols, and called the polyphonic space formed by seeing and saying as "non-place". In view of the fact that the closeness and inflexibility of structuralist linguistics deprive the symbolic materiality, Liotta points out that "figure" has a deconstruction effect on the "discourse" represented by structuralism. And the figure (see) and discourse (say) formed by the "non-place" called "the world." The potential dialogue between the two of them on the problem of linguistic graph is carried out in the ideological and cultural background of (post) structuralism and phenomenology, as well as the decline of the philosophy of consciousness (philosophy of subject), which involves consciousness / unconsciousness, subject / other, etc. Rational / physical thinking is still instructive.
【作者单位】： 南京大学文学院;
【分类号】：J205
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 许平;;异质性、合法性与中国设计叙事——重读利奥塔的后现代思想文献[J];南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计版);2008年06期
，本文编号：2251280
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/huihuayishu/2251280.html
