中国古典美学的体系性与非体系性辩证

发布时间：2018-01-17 16:30

本文关键词：中国古典美学的体系性与非体系性辩证　出处：《哲学动态》2012年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正中国古典美学是否有体系,这是理解中国古典美学需要思考的一个问题。在人们的认知里,中国古典哲学、美学、文论都是感受性的,缺乏逻辑性。这一点前人有过不同的论述:叶维廉认为,"中国传统的美感视境一开始就是超脱分析性、演绎性的",它是"点到即止"的[1];钱钟书则在《中国固有的文学批评的一个特点》一文中则指出,中国传统文学批评的特点是"把文章通盘的人化或生命化"[2]。但现在人们更乐于谈论中国古典美学的体系或体系性,论证中国古典美学的体系、体系性或潜体系性特
[Abstract]:Whether there is a system in Chinese classical aesthetics is a problem to be considered in understanding Chinese classical aesthetics. In people's cognition, Chinese classical philosophy, aesthetics and literary theory are all receptive. There is a lack of logic. There have been different arguments on this point: Yip Wei-lien believes that "the traditional aesthetic conception of China began as a transcendent analytical and deductive one", and it was "from point to point". [Qian Zhongshu pointed out in "A characteristic of Chinese Inherent Literary criticism" that the characteristic of Chinese traditional literary criticism is "the overall humanization or life of the article." [2]. But now people are more willing to talk about the system or systemativeness of Chinese classical aesthetics, and demonstrate the system, systematicness or latent systematicness of Chinese classical aesthetics.
【作者单位】：黑龙江大学文艺理论与文学批评研究中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目“中国古代体验式批评研究”(09YJA751021)资助成果
【分类号】：B83
【正文快照】： 中国古典美学是否有体系,这是理解中国古典美学需要思考的一个问题。在人们的认知里,中国古典哲学、美学、文论都是感受性的,缺乏逻辑性。这一点前人有过不同的论述:叶维廉认为,“中国传统的美感视境一开始就是超脱分析性、演绎性的”,它是“点到即止”的[1];钱钟书则在《中

【参考文献】