“自然的人化”与新中国自然美理论的逻辑进展

发布时间：2018-06-28 01:15

本文选题：自然的人化 + 自然的景观化　；参考：《学术月刊》2009年09期

【摘要】：近十年来,国内美学界关于自然美的元理论探索已基本位移为生态、景观、环境等门类美学的研究。其中,生态美学为重新认识自然美提供了全新的理论基础。但是,从中国当代美学自身的逻辑进程看,生态美学的出现并不意味着中国当代美学自身传统的断裂,而是同一命题的有序演绎。这一命题就是"自然的人化"。马克思《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中的自然人化思想是具有理论弹性和开放性的。自20世纪50年代进入中国后,它就由劳动实践层面的"人化"逐步向人的感觉、情感、伦理、语言层面拓展,并最终预示了景观美学的产生。因此,所谓的"自然人化"也就是自然的景观化,景观美学不过是"自然人化"的理论完成。与此相反,生态美学对人的主体性的遏制和消解,意味着它是"自然人化"理论的反题,但这一"反题"的出现却使建基于机械唯物论的自然美理论有了重新复活的重大契机。根据以上判断,中国当代美学史虽然总体上表现为对西方理论不断作出回应的历史,但它却依然围绕其核心命题完成着自身的理论运动。
[Abstract]:In the past ten years, the meta-theoretical exploration of natural beauty in domestic aesthetic circles has basically shifted to the study of ecology, landscape, environment and other categories of aesthetics. Among them, ecological aesthetics provides a new theoretical basis for re-understanding natural beauty. However, from the logical process of Chinese contemporary aesthetics itself, the appearance of ecological aesthetics does not mean the breakage of traditional Chinese contemporary aesthetics, but the orderly deduction of the same proposition. This proposition is the humanization of nature. The idea of naturalization in Marx's Economics and philosophy manuscript of 1844 is theoretical flexibility and openness. Since its entry into China in the 1950s, it has gradually expanded from the "humanization" of labor practice to human feeling, emotion, ethics and language, and finally foreshadowed the emergence of landscape aesthetics. Therefore, the so-called "naturalization" is the natural landscape, and the landscape aesthetics is only the completion of the theory of "naturalization". On the contrary, the containment and deconstruction of human subjectivity by ecological aesthetics means that it is the counterquestion of the theory of "naturalization", but the emergence of this "counterquestion" makes the natural beauty theory, which is based on mechanical materialism, have a great opportunity to revive again. According to the above judgment, although the history of contemporary Chinese aesthetics is a history of responding to western theories, it still completes its own theoretical movement around its core proposition.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学价值与文化研究中心;
【分类号】：B83-06

【共引文献】