平等带来的启示——评王建疆的别现代主义及中国美学的发展

发布时间：2018-12-27 09:51

【摘要】：王建疆关于中国美学与主义及其别现代的理论表达了中国哲学、人文学科包括美学要通过建立主义而达到与其不断增长的经济实力和科技实力相匹配的软实力目标。艾尔雅维茨与他的争议不仅仅是汉语与英语中对于"主义"的不同理解和不同界定,而是有着深刻的如朗西埃所说的平等与不平等、解放与未解放之间的哲学问题。通过朗西埃对贾寇托特教学法的解析发现,传统的建立在解释和阐释基础上的教与学,在根本上忽视了人的平等和解放,造就了顺从和盲目跟进的被动式接受。在平等哲学的视野中观照中国美学,中国的理论界不应该遵循朗西埃主张抛弃的教与学的老路,即甘当学生的老路,或者是解释的老路,而是坚持平等的观念,立足于本土现实提出自己的理论。我们发现,别现代主义就是朗西埃所说的构成平等的桥梁和媒介,是在中国理论与西方理论之间既接近又保持距离,或者既保持距离又可能接近,从而在完全平等的意义上使中西方理论都能得到验证。
[Abstract]:Wang Jianjiang's theories about Chinese aesthetics and doctrine and their different modernism express Chinese philosophy. The humanities subject includes aesthetics to reach the goal of soft power matching its increasing economic strength and scientific and technological power through the establishment of aesthetics. The controversy between Eljavic and him is not only the different understanding and definition of "doctrine" in Chinese and English, but also the philosophical problems between equality and inequality, emancipation and unemancipation. Through Lonsier's analysis of Giacotto's teaching method, it is found that the traditional teaching and learning based on interpretation and interpretation fundamentally ignores the equality and liberation of human beings, and creates passive acceptance of obedience and blind follow-up. Looking at Chinese aesthetics from the perspective of equal philosophy, the Chinese theorists should not follow the old way of teaching and learning, that is, the old way of being a student or an interpreter, but stick to the idea of equality. Based on the local reality, put forward their own theory. We find that the other modernism is the bridge and medium that Langsier calls equal, that is, the distance between Chinese theory and western theory, or the distance or the possibility of being close to each other. Thus, in the sense of complete equality, both Chinese and Western theories can be verified.
【作者单位】：斯洛文尼亚皮里莫斯卡大学哲学系;西北师范大学国际文化交流学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“别现代语境中英雄空间的解构与建构问题研究”(15BZW025)
【分类号】：B83-092

【相似文献】