历史发展与反思:中国古代音乐史学术方法与研究之关系探赜

发布时间：2018-04-23 02:34

本文选题：中国古代音乐史学 + 学术理念　；参考：《中国音乐学》2015年01期

【摘要】：本文从学术方法与研究关系角度,探讨中国古代音乐史学研究不同时期的学术理念与研究方法所起的重要作用与历史贡献。从"国学"到音乐学、从史料到田野考察、从音乐本体到文化、从单一实证到多元论证、从历史事件到学科发展,这一学科的研究视角、基础、范围、方法、地位等学科建设的每一次蜕变,学术理念、研究方法的继承与创新都起到了直接的推动和催化作用。目前学科内部细化而缺乏彼此联系与整体观照,局限于西方专业艺术史理念而缺乏中国文化艺术史特质,受制于意识形态与价值观判断而缺乏客观与公心的历史观,过度强调文献史料而缺乏史事为历史学服务的意识,学科性质认识不足而缺乏学术争鸣和高品质研究成果。我们应该关注学术理念与研究方法的不断发展与成熟,不落窠臼,使之更加系统化、科学化,促进这一学科深化发展。
[Abstract]:From the point of view of the relationship between academic methods and research, this paper probes into the important role and historical contribution of academic ideas and research methods in the study of ancient Chinese music history in different periods. From "Sinology" to musicology, from historical materials to fieldwork, from musical Noumenon to culture, from a single demonstration to multiple argumentation, from historical events to the development of the subject, the research perspective, basis, scope and method of this discipline, The succession and innovation of academic ideas and research methods play a direct role in promoting and catalyzing each transformation of status and other disciplines. At present, the discipline is refined and lacks of mutual connection and overall reflection, limited to the idea of western professional art history, lacking of the characteristics of Chinese cultural and artistic history, restricted by the judgment of ideology and values, and lacking of objective and public view of history. Too much emphasis on literature and historical materials and a lack of consciousness of serving history, lack of understanding of the nature of the subject and lack of academic controversy and high quality research results. We should pay attention to the continuous development and maturity of academic ideas and research methods, make them more systematic and scientific, and promote the deepening development of this subject.
【作者单位】：江苏师范大学音乐学院;中国艺术研究院研究生院;
【分类号】：J609.2

【参考文献】