阴阳观、《吕氏春秋》生律与史学研究——由《应当基于对原典的理解》一文所引发

发布时间：2019-05-14 22:02

【摘要】：所谓"七阳五阴"之说,其依据不成立,"答案"不存在,而《大乐》的"阳上阴下"又与《音律》的"为上""为下"没有关系。《音律》中运用阴阳观所作的阐发,未涉及音律本体问题,对音律相生没有任何暗示与规定。音律问题的解决最终要靠音律自身的规律来说明,而不是依赖于阴阳观的解释。基于原典与历史联系是通过文献解读求解历史问题的两种重要的原则和方法,将这两种方法有机地结合起来,既注重对原文献的理解分析,又善于将不同文献记载、"诸家之说"与原典相联系,就一定能使《吕氏春秋》之类的乐律学问题和其他一些历史问题,得到应有的、合理的解决。
[Abstract]:The so-called theory of "seven yang and five yin" is not founded, and the "answer" does not exist, and the "upper yin" of "yang" has nothing to do with the "upper" and "lower" of "rhythm". The explanation made by the use of the view of yin and yang in the sound law is made in the theory of "seven yang and five yin", which is not supported by the theory of "seven yang and five yin", and the "answer" does not exist. There is no problem of phonological Noumenon, and there are no hints and regulations on the occurrence of rhythm. In the end, the solution of the problem of rhythm depends on the law of the rhythm itself, rather than on the explanation of the view of yin and yang. Based on the relationship between the original scriptures and history, there are two important principles and methods for solving historical problems through literature interpretation. These two methods are organically combined, not only pay attention to the understanding and analysis of the original literature, but also be good at recording different documents. If the theory of the various schools is related to the original canon, the music and rhythm problems such as Lu's Spring and Autumn period and some other historical problems can be solved properly and reasonably.
【作者单位】：河南大学音乐学院;
【分类号】：J609.2

【共引文献】