房屋租赁合同中装饰装修物争议处理的法律调整

发布时间：2018-03-30 08:28

本文选题：租赁合同　切入点：房屋装饰装修物　出处：《华中科技大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：近几年，随着流动人口的增加和房价的攀升，为了解决最基本的居住问题和商业房屋使用问题,房屋租赁法律关系越来越频繁的运用到人们的生活的各个方面。实践中，承租人为了满足其家庭生活或商业运营的需要，一般会对所租赁房屋进行装修，当租赁合同届满、合同解除或无效等情况发生时，当事人双方关于装饰装修物的争议越来越多，对此争议的处理已经成为司法实践中一个亟待解决的问题。房屋租赁活动中产生的装修物，一方面来说，在物权方面，其独立于当事人双方之间的租赁关系，另一方面，就债权来说又属于合同的一部分。这就需要分别从物权和债权层面对其进行准确的区分，否则，就可能导致对二者的混淆，不利于合同当事人双方利益的平衡。此外，由于在立法和司法解释上缺乏统一的规定，法官在审判这类案件时，因没有法律依据导致司法实践中审判结果的混乱，从而也不能很好的保障承租人或出租人的合法权益，不利于正常司法活动和社会经济的健康发展。鉴于租赁中产生的装饰装修物纠纷关系到社会不特定人员的利益，应借鉴域外立法中有关解决房屋租赁合同中装饰装修物的相关规定，结合我国的现实情况，对我国房屋租赁合同中装饰装修物争议的相关法律法规进行研究，提出相关完善建议，以期对实践中此类纠纷的处理给出适用方法。本文拟首先通过对装饰装修物的界定及特点的研习，分析装饰装修物与合同二者之间的关系。其次，，通过对法释[2009]11号的研习评论及国内外现行立法在处理房屋租赁中装饰装修物归属的分析比较，指出我国相关的不足和国外在该方面的规定对我国的启示。本文第四部分和第五部分重点讨论区分在善意添附和恶意添附的情形下，装饰装修物的处理问题，并结合不当得利，损害赔偿，侵权责任及合同效力的不同情况，得出相关建议，以期获得理论支撑。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increase of floating population and the rise of house prices, in order to solve the most basic housing problems and commercial housing use problems, the legal relationship of housing lease is used more and more frequently in all aspects of people's life. In order to meet the needs of their family life or commercial operation, the lessee will generally decorate the leased house. When the lease contract expires, the contract is cancelled or invalid, the dispute on decoration and decoration between the parties is increasing. The settlement of this dispute has become an urgent problem in judicial practice. On the one hand, on the one hand, in terms of property rights, it is independent of the lease relationship between the parties, on the other hand, As far as claims are concerned, they are also part of the contract. This requires an accurate distinction between them from the aspects of real right and creditor's rights, otherwise, it may lead to confusion between the two parties, which is not conducive to the balance of the interests of both parties to the contract. Due to the lack of uniform provisions in legislation and judicial interpretation, when judges try such cases, the lack of legal basis leads to confusion of the judicial results in judicial practice, and thus the legitimate rights and interests of the lessee or lessor are not well protected. This is not conducive to normal judicial activities and the healthy development of social economy. We should draw lessons from the relevant provisions of the extraterritorial legislation to resolve the decoration and decoration items in the housing lease contract, and study the relevant laws and regulations concerning the decoration and decoration disputes in the housing lease contract in our country, in combination with the actual situation in our country. Put forward the relevant consummation suggestion, hope to give the suitable method to deal with this kind of dispute in practice. In this paper, first of all, through the study of the definition and characteristics of decoration and decoration, the relationship between decoration and contract is analyzed. Through the analysis and comparison of the study comments of the French interpretation [2009] 11 and the current legislation at home and abroad in handling the ownership of the decoration and decoration items in the housing lease, The author points out the deficiency of our country and the enlightenment to our country from the provisions of foreign countries. The fourth and fifth parts of this paper mainly discuss the problem of how to deal with decoration and decoration in the case of goodwill and malicious attachment, and combine with improper enrichment. Compensation for damages, tort liability and contract effectiveness of different situations, the relevant recommendations, in order to obtain theoretical support.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】