“龙跳天门”考辨——兼论王羲之书法的丰富性

发布时间：2018-05-28 18:52

  本文选题：龙跳天门 + 虎卧凤阁　； 参考：《中国书法》2017年22期

【摘要】：梳理与辨析古典书论的批评语言,是继承与转换古典传统、开展当代书学批评的必要前提。隋唐以降,原本含有贬义的书评语汇"龙跳天门",在书写传抄过程中发生讹误或者妄改,又经宋代《淳化阁帖》的刊刻而广为流布,逐渐成为对王羲之书法的一种"定评"(误评)。在文献梳理与考辨的基础上,可以发现"龙跳天门"遮蔽了王羲之书法最重要的美学内核。而更原始的袁昂《古今书评》却包含了丰富性,凸显了王羲之书法的超逸、自然、随意、性情等特征,揭示了王羲之面对传统时透出的主体性与创新精神。
[Abstract]:Sorting out and discriminating the critical language of classical book theory is the necessary prerequisite for inheriting and transforming classical tradition and carrying out contemporary criticism of calligraphy. In the Sui and Tang dynasties, the original derogatory word for book review, "the Dragon jumps to Heaven", was widely distributed in the Song Dynasty by the publication of the "Chun Hua Pavilion", which was corrupted or improperly changed in the process of writing and transmitting. It has gradually become a "definite comment" on Wang Xizhi calligraphy. On the basis of literature combing and textual research, it can be found that the most important aesthetic core of Wang Xizhi calligraphy is covered by "Dragon jumping Heaven Gate". But Yuan Ang's book review of ancient and modern times contains richness, which highlights the characteristics of Wang Xizhi calligraphy, such as superfluous, natural, random and temperament, and reveals the subjectivity and innovative spirit that Wang Xizhi reveals when facing the tradition.
【作者单位】： 华东师范大学;
【分类号】：J292.1
，

本文编号：1947796