因陀罗之网:互文性与文学空间
发布时间:2018-02-01 07:54
本文关键词: 互文性 文学空间 原型批评 超文本 赛博空间 出处:《广西师范大学》2006年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】: 法国著名学者克里斯蒂娃在总结和发展巴赫金的对话理论的基础上提出了互文性的概念,她指出:任何文本都是对其他文本的吸收和转化,一个文本的形成就如语录图的形成,镶嵌着多种引文。从1966年第一次提出这个概念开始,她多次在文章中提到这一概念,但是她并没有给这个概念以一个严格的定义。这就导致了后来学者的不断讨论与定义,以至于到如今它还是一个未定的概念。国外对互文性的研究成果颇多,相比于国外,国内的研究明显滞后,虽然近几年对互文性的研究呈上升之势,但专著较少。在各类学术刊物和文学杂志上,关于互文性的文章大多都是泛泛而论,缺乏系统、深入的研究。鉴于国内互文性研究的薄弱状态,本论文以文学空间为线索,分别从传统文学空间、赛博文学空间切入互文性研究,对其作历时的考察,论述其在不同文学空间下的不同表现,以期以一种新的视角对互文性理论作出新的论述。 全文分为三个部分。引言部分,梳理了互文性研究的国内外现状,对其进行系统的归纳分析,同时提出笔者对互文性研究的理论框架。 第一部分聚焦于互文性概念的学术史梳理,分别从互文性理论的前历史、互文性理论的提出、互文性概念的嬗变三个阶段勾勒出互文性理论的学渊谱系。论文认为,互文性作为一种间性的思维模式,它的产生远远在理论提出之前,在早期的人类思维神话思维中,就已经出现了这种注重事物之间的相互联系的思维模式。 第二部分探讨互文性理论与文学空间的关联域,侧重论析文学理论的“间性”问题。论文将互文性放在不同的关联域中进行分析。本章分为四节,第一节讨论了互文性与独创性的关系,第二节讨论比较文学视野下的互文性研究,即比较文学影响研究、平行研究、主题研究、母题研究与互文性的关系。第三节讨论比较诗学视野下的互文性研究,探讨了在中国古代文论中的互文性思想,并以刘勰的《文心雕龙》为个案,探讨古代文论与西方互文性理论会通的可能性。第四节以神话原型批评与互文性作为两大理论基点,讨论了互文性与其他理论之间的关系。论文认为,将20世纪中叶以来的互文性理论与当代西方文论的“空间转向”结合起来,从比较诗学的视域探索中西文论的会通,对建构文艺理论的当代形态具有重要的价值与意义。 第三部分是赛博空间下的互文透视,论述了在新的空间下,互文性呈现出的不同特点。分为两节:第一节讨论了空间的概念,指出这一概念是在不断的更新变化之中,在不同的领
[Abstract]:On the basis of summarizing and developing Bakhtin's theory of dialogue, the famous French scholar Cristina puts forward the concept of intertextuality. She points out that any text is the absorption and transformation of other texts. The formation of a text is like the formation of a quotation, inlaid with a variety of quotations. Since 1966, when she first proposed this concept, she has mentioned the concept many times in her article. But she did not give this concept a strict definition, which led to the subsequent discussion and definition of scholars, so that it is still an uncertain concept. Foreign research on intertextuality quite a lot. Compared with foreign countries, the domestic research lags behind obviously. Although the research on intertextuality is on the rise in recent years, there are few monographs in all kinds of academic journals and literary magazines. Most of the articles on intertextuality are general, lack of systematic, in-depth research. In view of the weak state of domestic intertextuality research, this paper takes literary space as a clue, respectively from the traditional literary space. The space of cyberspace is cut into the study of intertextuality, and its diachronic investigation is made, and its different manifestations in different literary spaces are discussed in order to make a new exposition on the theory of intertextuality from a new angle of view. The paper is divided into three parts: introduction, combing the current situation of intertextuality research at home and abroad, systematically summarizing and analyzing it, and putting forward the theoretical framework of intertextuality research. The first part focuses on the academic history of the concept of intertextuality, respectively from the pre-history of intertextuality theory, intertextuality theory put forward. The evolution of the concept of intertextuality outlines the genealogy of intertextuality in three stages. The paper holds that intertextuality, as an intertextuality mode of thinking, was produced far before the theory was put forward. In the early mythological thinking of human thinking, there has been such a focus on the interrelationship between things thinking mode. The second part discusses the intertextuality theory and literature space, focusing on the analysis of the literary theory of "intertextuality". The paper analyzes the intertextuality in different correlation domains. This chapter is divided into four sections. The first section discusses the relationship between intertextuality and originality, the second section discusses the intertextuality research in the perspective of comparative literature, namely, comparative literature impact study, parallel study, and thematic study. The third section discusses the study of intertextuality from the perspective of comparative poetics, discusses the intertextuality thought in ancient Chinese literary theory, and takes Liu Xie's Wen Xin Diao long as a case study. Section 4th discusses the relationship between intertextuality and other theories based on mythological archetypal criticism and intertextuality. By combining the theory of intertextuality since the middle of 20th century with the "space turn" of contemporary western literary theory, this paper explores the connection between Chinese and Western literary theories from the perspective of comparative poetics. It has important value and significance to construct the contemporary form of literary theory. The third part is the perspective of intertextuality in cyberspace, which discusses the different characteristics of intertextuality in the new space. It is divided into two sections: the first section discusses the concept of space. It is pointed out that this concept is constantly changing and changing in different fields.
【学位授予单位】:广西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2006
【分类号】:I0-05
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 苏玉娜;接受视野中的《小说月报》[D];山东师范大学;2010年
,本文编号:1481362
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/1481362.html