“文学性”与比较诗学——一项知识的考掘

发布时间：2018-03-25 21:02

本文选题：文学性　切入点：比较诗学　出处：《中国比较文学》2012年01期

【摘要】："文学性"是一个外来语。罗曼·雅可布逊于1919年提出literaturnost一词有其文学研究的特殊历史背景。该术语在1950-60年代被西欧和美国学者引进,英译为literariness(或literarity)、法译为littérarité,在内涵上亦多所敷延,不但脱离了原始的历史脉络,在新的语境中,如国内的文学研究与教学环境中,也滋生了许多意想不到的附加意义。本论文为"文学性"这个概念探源,叙述它在雅可布逊著作中的前后发展,诸如就历时性层面上,它与列宁党的文学论的回应关连,与当时未来主义诗作的互动;就并时性的理论层面上,这个概念如何交代诗语言透过语码和讯息的互动,产生表义功能和进行沟通功能。本文进一步指出当前以神经语言学为基础的认知科学对"文学性"的新诠释,亦出自雅可布逊的另外一条思路。本文指出"文学性"的语言形式主义脉络和生理科学脉络,企图透过这项汇通,提出比较诗学研究的新的可能。
[Abstract]:The term "literariness" is an exonym. Roman Jacobson put forward the term "literaturnost" in 1919. It has a special historical background in literary studies. The term was introduced by Western European and American scholars in the 1950-60 's. English translation as litt 茅 rarit 茅 and French translation as litt 茅 rarit 茅 not only deviate from the original historical context, but also in the new context, such as in the domestic literature research and teaching environment. This paper explores the source of the concept of "literariness" and narrates its development in Jacobson's works, such as its diachronic response to Lenin's theory of literature. The interaction with the futuristic poetry of that time, and how this concept explains the interaction of poetic language through code and information on the theoretical level of synchronism. This paper further points out the new interpretation of "literariness" by cognitive science based on neurolinguistics. This paper points out the linguistic formalism and physiological science context of "literariness" and attempts to put forward a new possibility of comparative poetics through this convergence.
【作者单位】：复旦大学中文系;
【基金】：复旦大学“985工程”三期整体推进社会科学研究项目资助
【分类号】：I0-03;I106

【相似文献】