《左传》与希罗多德《历史》比较研究

发布时间：2018-06-05 04:23

本文选题：《左传》 + 希罗多德　；参考：《苏州大学》2007年硕士论文

【摘要】： 《左传》与希罗多德《历史》分别是中国与希腊的两部重要的历史著作。本文分为三个部分:第一部分从史学的角度比较两书,指出《左传》是中国悠久的史官文化的产物,而《历史》的产生则与希腊文学有着紧密的联系。第二部分是对两部著作文学性的比较,两部书都是有着浓厚的文学趣味的史学著作,《左传》在叙事文学技法的运用上优于《历史》,然而《历史》也有其特点,在文学性上与希腊史诗和悲剧有一脉相通之处。第三部分从两个地区自然环境以及国家形成的差异等方面解释中国和希腊历史写作的差异,进而涉及哲学和两个民族气质上的差异,以及两部史书中所体现的梦文化的不同特点等。
[Abstract]:Zuo Zhuan and Herodotus History are two important historical works of China and Greece respectively. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part compares the two books from the perspective of historiography, pointing out that Zuo Zhuan is the product of the long history official culture in China, and the production of History is closely related to Greek literature. The second part is a comparison between the two works, both of which are historical works with strong literary interest. Zuo Zhuan is superior to History in the application of narrative techniques, but History also has its own characteristics. In literature, there is a link with the Greek epic and tragedy. The third part explains the differences in historical writing between China and Greece from the aspects of natural environment and the difference of national formation between the two regions, and then involves the differences in philosophy and national temperament. And the different characteristics of dream culture embodied in the two historical books.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：I0-03;I106.5

【引证文献】