后殖民视阈下的文学翻译策略研究

发布时间：2018-06-27 11:56

本文选题：后殖民视角 + 翻译策略　；参考：《宁波大学》2008年硕士论文

【摘要】： 传统翻译研究总是不能脱离语言学范畴,分析大多集中在源语和目的语的语言对比上。自二十世纪七十年代以来,“文化转向”和“后殖民转向”积极关注文化和政治问题,为翻译研究提供了一种新的视角。从后殖民视角来看,翻译所涉及的不仅仅是语言,它还反映出一个民族的文化以及政治,比如权力问题。归化和异化是近年来翻译研究中常常提到的两种主要翻译策略。不过,从后殖民视角来看,若是使用不当,往往会导致一些问题。西方国家在翻译第三世界国家文学文本时,多采用归化翻译策略,并且常常在译本中抹杀掉异国文化。过度的归化导致了文化霸权主义。第三世界国家在把本土文学文本译成英语时,期望把本国语言特性和民族价值观传递给强势文化,因而常常采用异化翻译策略。但是,过度的异化策略往往给目的语读者带来太多的文化他性从而导致阅读疲劳,使他们失去阅读兴趣而放弃阅读。这样翻译也就失去了意义,解殖民化也成为一种空想,结果导致民族中心主义和病态的文化自恋。总之,二元对立的归化和异化是不可取的。因此,译者应该采用存在于“第三空间”的一种有效翻译策略,即“杂合化”翻译策略。“杂合化”翻译策略是把归化和异化两种翻译策略有机地融合在一起,它既能传达源语文化,又能使目的语读者愉快地阅读译本。因此,杂合化翻译策略既能避免文化霸权主义或文化殖民,同时也能有效防止民族中心主义。本文从后殖民视角分析了归化、异化和杂合化三大翻译策略,探讨了归化异化两种翻译策略的不足之处,论证了杂合化翻译策略的长处,并且运用比较、分析和举例等方式来说明其实用性。最后本文得出结论:译者应该采用杂合化翻译策略,避免使用极端的归化和异化翻译策略。恰当运用杂合化翻译策略,译者就能译出令人满意的译本。
[Abstract]:Traditional translation studies can not be separated from the category of linguistics, the analysis is mostly focused on the source language and the target language contrast. Since the 1970s, the Cultural turn and the Post-colonial turn have been actively concerned with cultural and political issues, providing a new perspective for translation studies. From a post-colonial perspective, translation involves not only language, but also the culture and politics of a nation, such as power. Domestication and alienation are two major translation strategies that have been frequently mentioned in translation studies in recent years. However, from a post-colonial point of view, improper use can often lead to some problems. Western countries often adopt domesticated translation strategies when translating the literary texts of third world countries, and often wipe out foreign cultures in their translations. Excessive naturalization leads to cultural hegemonism. Third World countries, when translating native literary texts into English, expect to transfer their language characteristics and national values to strong cultures, so they often adopt the strategy of alienation translation. However, excessive strategies of alienation often bring too much cultural heterogeneity to the target language readers, which leads to reading fatigue and makes them lose interest in reading and give up reading. Thus, translation becomes meaningless and colonization becomes a kind of utopia, which leads to ethnocentrism and morbid cultural narcissism. In a word, the naturalization and alienation of dualistic opposition is not desirable. Therefore, the translator should adopt an effective translation strategy in the third space, that is, "hybrid" translation strategy. The "hybrid" translation strategy is a combination of domestication and foreignization, which can convey the source language culture and make the target language readers read the translation with pleasure. Therefore, hybrid translation strategy can not only avoid cultural hegemonism or cultural colonization, but also effectively prevent ethnocentrism. This paper analyzes the translation strategies of domestication, dissimilation and heterozygosity from the perspective of post-colonization, probes into the shortcomings of the two translation strategies, demonstrates the advantages of hybrid translation strategies, and compares them with each other. Analysis and examples to illustrate its practicability. Finally, the author concludes that the translator should adopt hybrid translation strategies and avoid extreme domestication and foreignization translation strategies. With the proper use of hybrid translation strategies, the translator will be able to translate a satisfactory translation.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：I046;H059

【相似文献】