中国与斯里兰卡爱情诗歌的比较研究
发布时间：2018-07-16 08:06
【摘要】：爱情，永远是社会生活的主题，也是世界文坛上长久不衰的母题。在抒发爱情的文学中，诗歌又是最古老也是最璀璨的文学载体。斯里兰卡和中国同处亚洲的文化圈中，以印度文化为渊源的斯里兰卡文化和中国文化，形成了独特而自主的文化体系。在古典爱情诗歌的领域，以伦理为中心的儒家文化和以佛祖为中心的佛教文化，各自培育出了相关联的主题：爱情抒情短诗的擅长和长篇叙事史诗的流行。而以农耕文化为底蕴的民族特色和面朝大海热带风情的岛国特色又形成了爱情内容和描写方式的侧重，直接的表达和描绘是斯里兰卡爱情诗歌的重要特色，而感伤情绪和对心理的细腻把握使中国的诗歌更注重深层的体悟和理解。 在19世纪末20世纪初风起云涌的时代，在相似的世界背景和社会环境中，两个国家的现代化历史也随之开启，在诗歌迈进各自现代化的过程中，两国的现代诗歌同样面临相似的龟裂、发展和演变。爱情诗歌的发展历程是这场“现代化”的一条重要线索。从两国现代诗歌所处的社会环境来看，现代爱情诗歌均呈现出下列特征：开放性、时代性、多元性和民族性，依照各国的实际情况，具体有所不同。在现代爱情诗歌中，徐志摩和Siri Gunasingha(悉利·古纳辛格)又分别是两国最值得关注的对象。 徐志摩是中国格律派的代表人物，Siri Gunasingha是斯里兰卡佩拉德尼亚派的代表人物，他们同受到西方思潮和文风的深刻影响，他们的思想都带着“现代性”的烙印，在联结各自民族和异质文化上都起到了出色的“使者”作用。他们都是诗歌的“天才”，带有强烈“个人色彩”，，显示着个人独到的领悟和魅力。 但他们又有明显的差异，徐的诗歌思想是唯美的、浪漫的，Gunasingha走的是现实主义道路。Siri Gunasingha的诗歌里处处体现着现实主义诗人的清醒和追问，他的爱情诗歌折射着现代爱情的弊病和深刻现实，而徐志摩在气质上又完全偏向于个人浪漫主义，沉湎于自我的爱情世界，为爱而诗。从英国回来的徐强调诗歌传统中的“格律”和“美”，Siri Gunasingha带着哲思之韵却带给了兰卡西方意象主义的热潮，他把斯里兰卡的自由体诗歌带上了一条全新的“现代”道路。对他们两人爱情诗歌的比较，更能形象地显示出两个国度在现代诗歌发展道路上不同的诗歌风景。
[Abstract]:Love is always the theme of social life and the motif of world literature. In the literature of expressing love, poetry is the oldest and brightest literary carrier. Sri Lanka and China are in the same Asian cultural circle. Sri Lankan culture and Chinese culture, which originated from Indian culture, have formed a unique and independent cultural system. In the field of classical love poetry, the Confucian culture centered on ethics and the Buddhist culture centered on Buddha have each cultivated the related themes: the excellence of short poems of love lyricism and the popularity of long narrative epics. However, the national characteristics of farming culture and the island features of tropical customs facing the sea form the emphasis of love content and description, and the direct expression and description are the important characteristics of Sri Lankan love poetry. And sentimental emotion and delicate grasp of psychology make Chinese poetry pay more attention to deep understanding and understanding. At the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, in the similar world background and social environment, the modernization history of the two countries began. The modern poetry of the two countries also faces the similar crack, development and evolution. The development of love poetry is an important clue of modernization. According to the social environment of modern poetry in the two countries, modern love poetry shows the following characteristics: openness, times, pluralism and nationality, according to the actual situation of different countries. In modern love poetry, Xu Zhimo and Siri Gunasingha are the two most worthy of attention. Siri Gunasingha, a representative of the Chinese Rhythm School, is a representative figure of the Peraldnian faction in Sri Lanka. Both of them are deeply influenced by western trends of thought and literary style, and their thoughts are marked with the brand of "modernity". In the connection of their respective nationalities and heterogeneous cultures have played an outstanding "messenger" role. They are all poetic geniuses, with strong "personal color", showing their own unique understanding and charm. But there are obvious differences between them. Xu's poetic thoughts are aesthetically beautiful. The romantic Gunasingha takes the realistic road. Siri Gunasingha's poems are full of realistic poets' sobriety and questioning. His love poems reflect the drawbacks and profound reality of modern love, while Xu Zhimo completely inclines to personal romanticism in temperament, indulges in the love world of his own, and poems for love. Xu, who came back from England, emphasized the "rhythm" and "beauty" in the tradition of poetry. Siri Gunasingha, with the rhyme of philosophy, brought the wave of western imagism to Lanka, and he took Sri Lankan's free style poetry to a new "modern" road. The comparison of their love poems can more vividly reveal the different poetic scenery of the two countries in the development of modern poetry.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：I0-03;I207.2;I358.072
本文编号：2125777
[Abstract]:Love is always the theme of social life and the motif of world literature. In the literature of expressing love, poetry is the oldest and brightest literary carrier. Sri Lanka and China are in the same Asian cultural circle. Sri Lankan culture and Chinese culture, which originated from Indian culture, have formed a unique and independent cultural system. In the field of classical love poetry, the Confucian culture centered on ethics and the Buddhist culture centered on Buddha have each cultivated the related themes: the excellence of short poems of love lyricism and the popularity of long narrative epics. However, the national characteristics of farming culture and the island features of tropical customs facing the sea form the emphasis of love content and description, and the direct expression and description are the important characteristics of Sri Lankan love poetry. And sentimental emotion and delicate grasp of psychology make Chinese poetry pay more attention to deep understanding and understanding. At the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, in the similar world background and social environment, the modernization history of the two countries began. The modern poetry of the two countries also faces the similar crack, development and evolution. The development of love poetry is an important clue of modernization. According to the social environment of modern poetry in the two countries, modern love poetry shows the following characteristics: openness, times, pluralism and nationality, according to the actual situation of different countries. In modern love poetry, Xu Zhimo and Siri Gunasingha are the two most worthy of attention. Siri Gunasingha, a representative of the Chinese Rhythm School, is a representative figure of the Peraldnian faction in Sri Lanka. Both of them are deeply influenced by western trends of thought and literary style, and their thoughts are marked with the brand of "modernity". In the connection of their respective nationalities and heterogeneous cultures have played an outstanding "messenger" role. They are all poetic geniuses, with strong "personal color", showing their own unique understanding and charm. But there are obvious differences between them. Xu's poetic thoughts are aesthetically beautiful. The romantic Gunasingha takes the realistic road. Siri Gunasingha's poems are full of realistic poets' sobriety and questioning. His love poems reflect the drawbacks and profound reality of modern love, while Xu Zhimo completely inclines to personal romanticism in temperament, indulges in the love world of his own, and poems for love. Xu, who came back from England, emphasized the "rhythm" and "beauty" in the tradition of poetry. Siri Gunasingha, with the rhyme of philosophy, brought the wave of western imagism to Lanka, and he took Sri Lankan's free style poetry to a new "modern" road. The comparison of their love poems can more vividly reveal the different poetic scenery of the two countries in the development of modern poetry.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：I0-03;I207.2;I358.072
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 周玉英;中国现代诗歌诗体的演变[J];安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版);2005年02期
2 金艳;略谈前期新月派艺术成就的中西融合特色[J];湖北经济学院学报;2003年04期
3 吕周聚,徐红妍;中国现代诗歌的多维观照与整体考察[J];江汉论坛;2004年02期
4 祝宽;中国现代诗歌的兴起、发展和外国诗歌刺激与影响之关系[J];青海社会科学;1985年01期
5 王源;中国情境中的西方诗潮——浅析象征主义在中国现代诗歌中的发展、流变[J];山东文学;2002年10期
6 王泽龙;论中国现代诗歌与西方象征主义诗歌意象艺术[J];社会科学研究;2005年03期
7 曹万生;30年代现代派对中西纯诗理论的引入及其变异[J];文学评论;2003年02期
本文编号：2125777
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/2125777.html
