主体的放逐：福柯文学思想研究
发布时间：2018-11-23 12:16
【摘要】： 本文在福柯的反主体哲学的根基上,探讨其文学思想,亦即反主体哲学怎样在其文学思想中形成主题与形成怎样的主题。全文分为三个部分。 第一部分为绪论,主要介绍福柯的生平、思想与著作,课题的研究的缘起、现状、意义以及创新点。 第二部分是正文,分为三章: 第一章考察了福柯的作者理论以及对文学出现的见解。首先,福柯认为作者并不先在于作品,作者只是代表一定的原则来限制、排斥、挑选作品的工具,或者说“作者”只是一个发明的语词。其次,这种对主体的质疑与他对文学“出现”的论述也不无关系,在这种“出现”之后,文学是一个自足的结构空间,仅仅是一种“语言的单纯表现”,并“在自己的存在中闪烁”。 第二章通过与德里达的比较,见出福柯的文本解读策略。福柯认为,读解一个文本的最好办法,是参照语境。回到文本本身与细读也是福柯的解读策略。这也与福柯思想体系中“主体”的缺席有不可分割的关系,语境不是人为设置的,而是自然运作的,文本本身更隔断了创作主体与创作对象的关系。 第三章通过对《疯癫与文明》的分析,阐述疯癫与艺术(文学)的关系。一方面,艺术家的疯癫在一定程度上成就了艺术品,非理性因素也是文学艺术质的规定性所在。另一方面,疯癫又难以与艺术品共存,或谓“疯癫是艺术作品的缺席”。虽然福柯已经较为自觉地放逐主体在文学艺术创作中的作用,但我们从他对疯癫与文艺的关系的论述中可以看到,这种放逐是不彻底的,这在根本上是因为疯癫体验本身就是一种非常主体性的东西。 在第三部分即结语中,笔者对福柯的文学思想进行了简要的总结和评析。
[Abstract]:On the basis of Foucault's anti-subject philosophy, this paper discusses his literary thought, that is, how the anti-subject philosophy forms the theme and what kind of theme it forms in his literary thought. The full text is divided into three parts. The first part is the introduction, mainly introduces Foucault's life, thought and works, the origin, the present situation, the significance and the innovation of the subject. The second part is the text, which is divided into three chapters: the first chapter examines Foucault's author's theory and his views on literary emergence. First of all, Foucault thinks that the author does not lie in the work first, but only represents a certain principle to limit, reject, select the tool of the work, or "author" is only an invented word. Secondly, this questioning of the subject has something to do with his exposition of "appearance" of literature. After this "emergence", literature is a self-sufficient structural space, and is only a "pure expression of language". And twinkle in his own existence. The second chapter shows Foucault's reading strategy by comparing with Derrida. Foucault believes that the best way to read a text is to refer to context. To return to the text itself and read carefully is Foucault's reading strategy. This is also related to the absence of "subject" in Foucault's thought system. Context is not set up by man but by nature, and the text itself separates the relationship between the subject and the object of creation. The third chapter expounds the relationship between madness and art (literature) through the analysis of Mad and Civilization. On the one hand, the artist's madness has made art to a certain extent, and irrationality is also the stipulation of literary and artistic quality. On the other hand, madness is difficult to coexist with art, or "madness is the absence of works of art". Although Foucault has been more conscious of the role of the subject in literary and artistic creation, we can see from his exposition on the relationship between madness and literature and art that this exile is incomplete. This is fundamentally because the insane experience itself is a very subjective thing. In the third part, the author summarizes Foucault's literary thoughts.
【学位授予单位】：四川师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：I0
本文编号：2351581
[Abstract]:On the basis of Foucault's anti-subject philosophy, this paper discusses his literary thought, that is, how the anti-subject philosophy forms the theme and what kind of theme it forms in his literary thought. The full text is divided into three parts. The first part is the introduction, mainly introduces Foucault's life, thought and works, the origin, the present situation, the significance and the innovation of the subject. The second part is the text, which is divided into three chapters: the first chapter examines Foucault's author's theory and his views on literary emergence. First of all, Foucault thinks that the author does not lie in the work first, but only represents a certain principle to limit, reject, select the tool of the work, or "author" is only an invented word. Secondly, this questioning of the subject has something to do with his exposition of "appearance" of literature. After this "emergence", literature is a self-sufficient structural space, and is only a "pure expression of language". And twinkle in his own existence. The second chapter shows Foucault's reading strategy by comparing with Derrida. Foucault believes that the best way to read a text is to refer to context. To return to the text itself and read carefully is Foucault's reading strategy. This is also related to the absence of "subject" in Foucault's thought system. Context is not set up by man but by nature, and the text itself separates the relationship between the subject and the object of creation. The third chapter expounds the relationship between madness and art (literature) through the analysis of Mad and Civilization. On the one hand, the artist's madness has made art to a certain extent, and irrationality is also the stipulation of literary and artistic quality. On the other hand, madness is difficult to coexist with art, or "madness is the absence of works of art". Although Foucault has been more conscious of the role of the subject in literary and artistic creation, we can see from his exposition on the relationship between madness and literature and art that this exile is incomplete. This is fundamentally because the insane experience itself is a very subjective thing. In the third part, the author summarizes Foucault's literary thoughts.
【学位授予单位】：四川师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：I0
【引证文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 林莺;;意识流与疯癫之哲学新解[J];东南学术;2009年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 吕菲菲;论米歇尔·福柯的文学语言观[D];山东师范大学;2009年
，本文编号：2351581
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/2351581.html
