我国理工科大学公共艺术教育模式研究

发布时间：2018-11-25 15:48

【摘要】：世界上培养一流创新人才的大学都有完备的艺术教育。实践证明，艺术教育在人才培养方面具有科学教育无法替代的作用。在我国，艺术教育是素质教育的重要组成部分。艺术素质作为一种基本素质，已不再是专业艺术学院和综合性大学的专利。近年来，我国理工科大学公共艺术教育发展迅速，大家都认识到了其价值所在，即社会价值、文化价值以及育人价值。理工科大学公共艺术教育有其特殊性，本文根据其特殊性提出了公共艺术教育在理工科人学的定位。但是，目前我国理工科大学公共艺术教育还处于薄弱环节，且存在诸多问题。本文主要通过问卷调查的方法了解了当前我国理工科大学公共艺术教育现状和现行模式，并指出了其问题所在：缺乏艺术教育传统；教师队伍专业素质整体水平不高；公共艺术教育背离“普及”的初衷；学校强势学科的压力；缺乏科学的艺术教育教学和管理模式；对公共艺术教育的人文性缺乏认识等等。美国的艺术教育发达且丰富，值得我们学习与借鉴。本文在第四章介绍了哈佛大学和麻省理工学院的艺术教育现状，并对中美两国的艺术教育进行了比较，得到以下几点启示：把艺术作为核心课程；由政府和社会各方面共同推进，加强公共艺术教育投资；把公共艺术教育的成败与国家富强相联系并加强其研究。在此基础上，提出了“统筹和谐”的公共艺术教育模式。从日标、管理、途径、课程、资源和评价等六个方面对此模式进行了具体论述。本文最后一章对保障我国理工科大学公共艺术教育模式的运行提出了相关对策，即加强理工科大学校园文化建设；建立和完善理工科大学公共艺术教育教学管理机制与评估制度；加强理工科大学艺术课程建设；加强理工科大学艺术教师和特长生的引进和培养工作；充分发挥理工科大学信息学科和专业的优势；充分挖掘社会公共艺术教育资源等。
[Abstract]:Universities that train top-class innovative talents in the world have complete art education. Practice has proved that art education plays an irreplaceable role in the cultivation of talents. In our country, art education is an important part of quality education. As a basic quality, artistic quality is no longer the patent of professional art college and comprehensive university. In recent years, public art education in science and engineering universities in China has developed rapidly, and everyone has realized its value, that is, social value, cultural value and educational value. The public art education of science and engineering university has its particularity, according to its particularity, this paper puts forward the orientation of public art education in science and engineering humanities. However, public art education in science and engineering universities in China is still in a weak link, and there are many problems. This article mainly through the questionnaire investigation method has understood the present situation and the present pattern of the public art education of our country science and engineering university, and has pointed out its problem: lacks the artistic education tradition, the teacher troop specialized quality overall level is not high; Public art education deviates from the original intention of "popularization"; the pressure of strong discipline in school; the lack of scientific teaching and management mode of art education; the lack of understanding of the humanism of public art education, etc. The art education in the United States is well developed and rich, which is worthy of our study and reference. In the fourth chapter, this paper introduces the present situation of art education in Harvard University and MIT, and compares the art education between China and the United States, and gets the following enlightenment: take art as the core curriculum; To strengthen public art education investment by the government and all aspects of society, to link the success or failure of public art education with the prosperity and strength of the country and to strengthen its research. On this basis, put forward the "overall harmony" public art education model. This model is discussed in detail from six aspects: day standard, management, approach, curriculum, resources and evaluation. The last chapter of this paper puts forward some countermeasures to guarantee the operation of public art education mode of science and engineering universities in our country, that is, to strengthen the campus culture construction of science and engineering universities; To establish and perfect the teaching management mechanism and evaluation system of public art education in universities of science and engineering, to strengthen the construction of art courses in universities of science and engineering, to strengthen the introduction and training of art teachers and students of specialty in universities of science and engineering; Give full play to the advantages of information science and specialty in science and engineering universities, and fully tap the resources of social public art education.
【学位授予单位】：武汉理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：G642.0;J0-4

【相似文献】