文学“再政治化”批判——兼论文学与政治的深层融通
发布时间：2018-11-29 10:08
【摘要】：正改革开放之初,面对文学拘囿于政治牢笼的状况,学界以文学"纯"化、"审美"化、"主体"化作为知识策略(也就是"去政治化"),拯救文学于水生火热之中,肯定了文学的自主性,功不可没。然而,作为"策略"行为的"审美"、"美感"、"纯化"不知不觉中却形成了一种新型的"审美霸权"与"美感殖民",文学已然成为了"审美"单向度的存在,甚至讳言任何文学与外在的关联。文学好不容易走出了"政治城",却不小心又跌人了"审美自主城"。面对此种现状,学界开始了对文学政治维度
[Abstract]:At the beginning of reform and opening up, in the face of the situation that literature is confined to political cages, the academic circles turn literature into "pure", "aesthetic" and "subject" as knowledge strategy (that is, "depoliticization"), and save literature in the hot water. Affirmed the autonomy of literature, the contribution can not be ignored. However, as the "aesthetic", "aesthetic feeling" and "purification" of "strategic" behavior, a new type of "aesthetic hegemony" and "aesthetic colonization" have been formed unconsciously, and literature has become the existence of "aesthetic" unidirectional degree. It is not even true that any literature is related to the outside. Literature is not easy to walk out of the "political city", but inadvertently fell to the "aesthetic autonomous city." In the face of this situation, the academic circles began to study the political dimension of literature.
【作者单位】： 河南师范大学文学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学项目“布尔迪厄文艺思想与中国当代文论建设”阶段性成果,项目编号:12YJC751046
【分类号】：I0-05
[Abstract]:At the beginning of reform and opening up, in the face of the situation that literature is confined to political cages, the academic circles turn literature into "pure", "aesthetic" and "subject" as knowledge strategy (that is, "depoliticization"), and save literature in the hot water. Affirmed the autonomy of literature, the contribution can not be ignored. However, as the "aesthetic", "aesthetic feeling" and "purification" of "strategic" behavior, a new type of "aesthetic hegemony" and "aesthetic colonization" have been formed unconsciously, and literature has become the existence of "aesthetic" unidirectional degree. It is not even true that any literature is related to the outside. Literature is not easy to walk out of the "political city", but inadvertently fell to the "aesthetic autonomous city." In the face of this situation, the academic circles began to study the political dimension of literature.
【作者单位】： 河南师范大学文学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学项目“布尔迪厄文艺思想与中国当代文论建设”阶段性成果,项目编号:12YJC751046
【分类号】：I0-05
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 陶东风;;文学公共领域的理想类型与应然品格[J];东方丛刊;2008年04期
2 金生，
本文编号：2364707
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/2364707.html
