论鲍曼的现代性
发布时间：2019-05-14 02:13
【摘要】： 本文将依次展开对鲍曼现代性特征的论述:第一章重点论述知识分子实践,知识分子作为现代性尤其是作为审美现代性的主体,它在遭遇现代性时所发生的角色转换、地位变迁最生动地揭示了现代性的有关特质,知识分子从现代性的立法者到后现代性的阐释者,这个过程不是绝对的、干净利落的。其实,知识分子始终具有两种角色,只不过在现代性中,立法者是主角;在后现代性中,阐释者是主角。 在第二章里,通过展示鲍曼对大屠杀事件的透视,呈现出现代性潜隐的可能性。现代性这柄双刃剑,既能披荆斩棘、开拓进步,也能自我损毁,开放出“恶之花”。对现代性的反思和批判之所以必要,不是来自外部,而是现代性内在的需求和召唤。 第三章论述现代性内部的矛盾纠结,在后现代的视域中,鲍曼认为现代性是变动不居的,向未来的无限开放是现代性的本质特征,但现代性永远是走在路上,永远是个尚未实现的计划,它在解决矛盾的同时又在创造着自身新的矛盾,即同时产生着自身的“毒药”和“解药”。审美现代性以一种不肯苟且的否定性力量,对社会现代性补弊纠偏,实现后者肯定性的企图。 第四章,重点论述现代性的流动性特征,鲍曼用“液体”来隐喻现代性的流动变化,在从沉重的、固态的现代性到轻灵的液态的现代性中,有一个显著的变化是空间让位于时间,即时间上的瞬时性和短暂性获得生存机遇,成为时代之主题,而在空间上沉重的“持久性”则失去魅力和价值。经济上的这种变化必然会涉及到人们的社会心理,也会直接渗透进人们对文化和文学的创造与接受过程。
[Abstract]:This paper will discuss the characteristics of Bowman's modernization in turn: the first chapter focuses on the practice of intellectuals, which, as the main body of modernization, especially as the subject of aesthetic modernization, has undergone the transformation of its role in the event of modernization. The status change most vividly reveals the relevant characteristics of modernity. the process of intellectuals from the legislator of modernization to the interpreter of post-modernism is not absolute and clean. In fact, intellectuals always have two roles, except that in modernization, the legislator is the protagonist, and in the post-modernism, the interpreter is the protagonist. In the second chapter, by showing Bowman's perspective on the massacre, it shows the possibility of modernization. Modernization, a double-edged sword, can not only cut thorns, open up progress, but also self-damage, open up the "flower of evil." The reason why the reflection and criticism of modernity is necessary is not from the outside, but from the inherent needs and calls of modernity. The third chapter discusses the internal contradiction and entanglement of modernity. in the perspective of postmodernism, Bowman believes that modernity is immutable, and the infinite opening to the future is the essential feature of modernity, but modernity is always on the road. It is always an unrealized plan, which not only solves the contradiction, but also creates its own new contradiction, that is, it produces its own "poison" and "antidote" at the same time. Aesthetic modernity, with a negative force that refuses to agree, corrects the disadvantages of social modernization and realizes the latter's affirmative attempt. The fourth chapter focuses on the liquidity characteristics of modernity. Bowman uses "liquid" to metaphor the flow change of modernity, from heavy, solid modernization to light liquid modernization. A significant change is that space gives way to time, that is, the transient and transient survival opportunities in time become the theme of the times, while the heavy "persistence" in space loses its charm and value. This economic change will inevitably involve people's social psychology, but also directly permeate the process of creation and acceptance of culture and literature.
【学位授予单位】：河北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：I0
[Abstract]:This paper will discuss the characteristics of Bowman's modernization in turn: the first chapter focuses on the practice of intellectuals, which, as the main body of modernization, especially as the subject of aesthetic modernization, has undergone the transformation of its role in the event of modernization. The status change most vividly reveals the relevant characteristics of modernity. the process of intellectuals from the legislator of modernization to the interpreter of post-modernism is not absolute and clean. In fact, intellectuals always have two roles, except that in modernization, the legislator is the protagonist, and in the post-modernism, the interpreter is the protagonist. In the second chapter, by showing Bowman's perspective on the massacre, it shows the possibility of modernization. Modernization, a double-edged sword, can not only cut thorns, open up progress, but also self-damage, open up the "flower of evil." The reason why the reflection and criticism of modernity is necessary is not from the outside, but from the inherent needs and calls of modernity. The third chapter discusses the internal contradiction and entanglement of modernity. in the perspective of postmodernism, Bowman believes that modernity is immutable, and the infinite opening to the future is the essential feature of modernity, but modernity is always on the road. It is always an unrealized plan, which not only solves the contradiction, but also creates its own new contradiction, that is, it produces its own "poison" and "antidote" at the same time. Aesthetic modernity, with a negative force that refuses to agree, corrects the disadvantages of social modernization and realizes the latter's affirmative attempt. The fourth chapter focuses on the liquidity characteristics of modernity. Bowman uses "liquid" to metaphor the flow change of modernity, from heavy, solid modernization to light liquid modernization. A significant change is that space gives way to time, that is, the transient and transient survival opportunities in time become the theme of the times, while the heavy "persistence" in space loses its charm and value. This economic change will inevitably involve people's social psychology, but also directly permeate the process of creation and acceptance of culture and literature.
【学位授予单位】：河北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：I0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 司娟;;评述“寻根文学”的后现代性[J];时代文学(下半月);2011年08期
2 王艳蕊;关慧颖;;以3D电影为例,分析视觉文化中的后现代性[J];青春岁月;2011年14期
3 张U，
本文编号：2476359
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/2476359.html
