分歧的取向——“后理论”景观扫描

发布时间：2018-04-12 19:04

  本文选题：文学研究 + 后理论　； 参考：《江苏大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年01期

【摘要】：无论是文学理论、理论还是后理论,都涉及理论与文学研究的关系这一根本问题。近年来,文学理论界围绕"后理论"掀起了讨论热潮,形成了话语生产醒目的景观。不应忽视的是,后理论有着诸多不同的取径:以为理论终结乃至可以弃绝理论者有之,主张理论因散布而取得成功者有之,强调理论回归文学者有之,张扬理论的反思与多元者亦有之,如此等等。对于后理论存在分歧的多重意味及各自的内部构成,应予具体分析,区别对待。
[Abstract]:Both literary theory, theory and post-theory involve the fundamental question of the relationship between theory and literary research.In recent years, literature theorists have set off an upsurge of discussion around post-theory, forming an eye-catching landscape of discourse production.It should not be ignored that there are many different approaches to post theory: those who believe that the theory is over or even can be rejected, those who claim that the theory is successful because of its dissemination, and those who emphasize the return of the theory to literature.The reflection and pluralism of Zhang Yang's theory also exist, and so on.It should be analyzed and treated differently for the multiple meanings of differences in post theory and their internal composition.
【作者单位】： 福建社会科学院文学所;
【分类号】：I0
，

本文编号：1741021