基于意向管辖多重整合论(IMT)的汉语人体谜语创作机制研究
发布时间:2018-05-08 19:10
本文选题:BT + IMT ; 参考:《四川外语学院》2010年硕士论文
【摘要】: 谜语是人们喜闻乐见的一种语言性游戏,汉语谜语深受中国人的喜爱。自公元五世纪以来,众多学者从民俗学、修辞学、认知心理学、语言学等角度对其进行了深入的研究,但主要集中于对形式及内容的客观和静态描写。近年来,虽有个别研究者从认知语言学角度对其意义解读过程作出研究,但理论框架不明,创作机制论述不清,且缺乏专题语料分析。 据此,本文基于Fauconnier的“概念整合理论(BT)”,提出“意向管辖多重整合理论(IMT)”,并以此为理论框架详细分析了汉语人体谜语的创作过程,为解读汉语谜语机制提供一条新方案。 本文分为五章,主要内容如下: 第一章“引言”,介绍本文研究对象、选题理据、研究目的、所用语料、分析方法、结构布局。 第二章“文献综述”,回顾有关汉语谜语的过往研究,并分析这些研究所存在的不足之处。 第三章“理论框架”,在分析BT之不足的基础上提出IMT,以解读汉语人体谜语的创作机制。 第四章“语料分析和讨论”,首先描写为此项研究所建立的封闭语料,并运用上文提出的理论框架,较为深入地分析了241条汉语人体谜语的动态创作过程,并佐以相关数据和比例。 第五章“结语”,总结全文内容,归纳三点贡献: 1.通过四个途径修补了BT:引入“事件域认知模型(ECM)”作为心理空间的内容;建立“意向空间(IS)”来管辖所有输入空间;用总类属空间(GG)来确保输入空间之间的关系在最后的融合空间中得到实现;增加一种新发现的融合网络:“平衡网络(Balance Network)”。基于此,建立了本文的理论框架IMT模型。 2.首次尝试运用IMT分析汉语人体谜语创作中的结构、语音及语义特点。 3.在汉语人体谜语创作中总共用到15条概念隐喻,涉及到15种源域。在Deignan (2001)和K?vecses(2002)发现的源域类型的基础上,又增加了6种,另6种也得到了修补。 最后,指出本文的不足之处,为以后的研究提出点滴建议。
[Abstract]:Riddle is a kind of language game that people like to see, Chinese riddle is deeply loved by Chinese people. Since the fifth century of AD, many scholars have studied it from the perspectives of folklore, rhetoric, cognitive psychology, linguistics and so on, but mainly focused on the objective and static description of form and content. In recent years, although some researchers have studied the process of reading its meaning from the perspective of cognitive linguistics, the theoretical framework is unclear, the creation mechanism is not clear, and there is a lack of thematic corpus analysis. Therefore, based on Fauconnier's "Conceptual Integration Theory", this paper puts forward "intention jurisdiction multiple Integration Theory (IMT)", and analyzes the creation process of Chinese human riddles in detail as a theoretical framework, which provides a new scheme for interpreting the mechanism of Chinese riddles. This paper is divided into five chapters, the main contents are as follows: The first chapter, introduction, introduces the research object, the motivation, the purpose, the corpus, the analysis method and the structure layout. Chapter two, "Literature Review", reviews the previous researches on Chinese riddles and analyzes their shortcomings. Chapter three, "theoretical Framework", puts forward IMT on the basis of analyzing BT's deficiency in order to explain the creative mechanism of Chinese human riddles. Chapter four, "Corpus Analysis and discussion", first describes the closed corpus established for this study, and analyzes the dynamic creation process of 241 Chinese human riddles by using the theoretical framework put forward above. And with the relevant data and proportion. Chapter V "conclusion" summarizes the content of the full text and concludes three contributions: 1. This paper revises BTT through four ways: introducing "event Domain Cognitive Model (ECM)" as the content of psychological space, establishing "intention space" to govern all input spaces; In this paper, we use the general generic space (GG) to ensure that the relationship between the input spaces is realized in the final fusion space, and add a newly discovered fusion network: "balance network balance network". Based on this, the theoretical framework IMT model is established. 2. It is the first time to use IMT to analyze the structural, phonological and semantic features of Chinese human riddles. 3. A total of 15 conceptual metaphors are used in the creation of Chinese human riddles, involving 15 source domains. On the basis of the source domain types found in Deignan 2001 and KTV sess2002), six new types were added and the other 6 types were repaired. Finally, the paper points out the shortcomings of this paper, and puts forward some suggestions for future research.
【学位授予单位】:四川外语学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:I057
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周春林;;爱情短信谜语及其谜法[J];大理学院学报(社会科学);2006年09期
2 任蒙;试论中国诗歌与谜语的相互影响和发展[J];湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1988年04期
3 王燕;;谜语策略及认知机制[J];哈尔滨学院学报;2006年03期
4 高国藩;;《红楼梦》中的谜语[J];红楼梦学刊;1984年01期
5 周启云;谜语与古咏物诗[J];河南大学学报(社会科学版);1993年05期
6 柳杨;;概念整合理论与英语智力谜语[J];考试周刊;2007年22期
7 李可祥;;谜语理解的研究[J];南方论刊;2004年10期
8 李桃锋;梁远春;;谜语的体验性和隐喻思维[J];四川经济管理学院学报;2007年02期
9 赵海燕;骆小所;;谜语中的修辞现象[J];山西科技;2008年02期
10 竹君;;“灯谜”与“谜语”的区别[J];山西老年;2006年11期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 陈瑜;汉语谜语理解的认知解读:概念整合分析法[D];西南大学;2008年
,本文编号:1862675
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/1862675.html